Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Scramjet test coverage now on fox

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Probably not.

An 11 second burn using two pounds of fuel is a rate of 654.55 (rounded off) pounds per hour.

Must have been some rate of acceleration to reach Mach 7 in 11 seconds from the 3,500 mph reached by the rocket motor.
 
The Fox web site said the altitude was about 100,000 feet, so looking at my little chart here, it's 675.8 mph.
 
Timebuilder said:
Must have been some rate of acceleration to reach Mach 7 in 11 seconds from the 3,500 mph reached by the rocket motor.

That's about 4.6 g As a point of reference the space shuttle's engines are throttled to give a max acceleration of 3 g and an ejection seat gives you 12g-18g.
 
A plane carries it to FL 350, than a rocket carries it up to FL 1000 and accelerates it to mach 5, and than a burn of something accelerates it another 2 mach.

What are they going to do know?

Looks like they need to have 3 types of engines on the missle to make it work, or launch them from fighters.

I want to see that mach 7 airliner.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top