Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Rumor mill

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
A lot of rumors about b6 and frontier busses.I know it's premature, but there are a lot of good pilots at frontier, I hope if this is true we help them out as much as we can.
 
I herd couple of times that BB has being at B6 HQ!!! Plus the B's are expecting a baby!!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
now this is true!!!
 
I won't be signing those and hopefully we can get LLBL and an arbitrator working on some fresh issues for us.

First things first though.
 
Im heard more of an a/c swap. 190's for 320/319's. Ill believe it when I read the memo. 2 days ago JetBlue was for sure merging with AA.
 
Yeah, im going to say that wont happen. Quit trying to scare people, you arent doing anyone favors typing immature crap like that.

Really?

Nobody can argue they don't have the ability to fragment under the DR.

The question is, would they?

Given the way they've conducted themselves during the JBPA and ALPA campaigns, and during this 5 Docs fiasco, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they tried something like that.

Sandy is suggesting that if we don't sign, he doesn't know if they could protect us. If he's willing to throw THAT out there then how can you say they wouldn't try something like fragmentation?

I'm tired of trust and faith.

Trust and faith have gotten us sh!t health insurance, a hike in premium trigger, FSM shennanigans, no "work arounds" for retirement, and on and on and on and on....

....but you trust them not to screw us with a holding company magic trick.

You've got a high threshold for b#llsh!t.
 
Really?

Nobody can argue they don't have the ability to fragment under the DR.

The question is, would they?

Given the way they've conducted themselves during the JBPA and ALPA campaigns, and during this 5 Docs fiasco, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they tried something like that.

Sandy is suggesting that if we don't sign, he doesn't know if they could protect us. If he's willing to throw THAT out there then how can you say they wouldn't try something like fragmentation?

I'm tired of trust and faith.

Trust and faith have gotten us sh!t health insurance, a hike in premium trigger, FSM shennanigans, no "work arounds" for retirement, and on and on and on and on....

....but you trust them not to screw us with a holding company magic trick.

You've got a high threshold for b#llsh!t.

The quickest way to a union at this company is to fragment us. So what would they do? Hire all new pilots for the new busses? Bring fapa over? Think man! Yeah, the sandovan email was crap, yeah i dont agree with the documents, yes i think we need a cba.

Do i think the company would ship 400 of our pilots including some of our chiefs, fleet capts, etc who are qualified on the 190? Absolutely not, thats a quick route to lawsuits, unionization, and total upheaval. It would never happen.
 
Men you two keep b-ching at each other like sisters!!!
Management is going to do what they want at any time and the only thing pilots have control of is: "I quit". other than that your going for a ride.... B
 
The quickest way to a union at this company is to fragment us. So what would they do? Hire all new pilots for the new busses? Bring fapa over? Think man! Yeah, the sandovan email was crap, yeah i dont agree with the documents, yes i think we need a cba.

Do i think the company would ship 400 of our pilots including some of our chiefs, fleet capts, etc who are qualified on the 190? Absolutely not, thats a quick route to lawsuits, unionization, and total upheaval. It would never happen.


Exactly. If they tried to pull a stunt like that they would have a ALPA on property so fast their head would spin. We all know they don't want that, plus they don't really have anything to gain from a fragmenting stuff. All they would do is piss everybody off and have a USAir east/west situation on their hands. Baaaaaad juju.

I'm willing to be the F9 deal has mostly to do with assets, such as gates, routes, and Airbusses (or Airbii, whatever) if it happens. And that is a big fat IF.

On top of that, if they are negotiating against, WN, they'll pay high for it, just like they paid high for the LGA/DCA slots. WN is laughing, getting JB to pay for all this stuff so when they buy us in a year or two, they get it all anyway.
 
All the bickering over the amendment is useless. The 5 documents were already voted in a few weeks ago. We are all working under them now. People are going crazy over sign or don't sign. This is nothing more than a distraction for what the company really has up their sleeve. Regardless of which PEA one chooses, the company can do whatever they please. The language in the PEAs is too weak to hold any water. The company knows this. We are all along for the ride until we unionize and negotiate for a CBA. If a T/E takes place, the company is in the driver's seat. The company will be deciding our fate. We will get whatever they want to give us. Instead of arguing over which PEA is better or worse, we need to focus on the next union drive. The company is laughing at us while we decide which POS PEA to adopt.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom