Freebrd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2003
- Posts
- 2,665
BECAUSE THEY WANT US DUTIED IN! The efficiency of the trip isn't the top priority for them, it's that if we're dutied in we're just one step away from being on reserve.
Tally Ho!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BECAUSE THEY WANT US DUTIED IN! The efficiency of the trip isn't the top priority for them, it's that if we're dutied in we're just one step away from being on reserve.
They'll want to deal on Vacation Low (Co hates it) so we can negotiate for these improvements but unfortunately Vacation Low will have to be altered. Thoughts????
Agree! Keep what we have (PBS) and improve credits (6 hrs each day for AQP), drop that 60% of the lines 4 day bullcrap down to oh, say, 30-40%, 3 days 50%, whatever, but improve pairing construction!
They'll want to deal on Vacation Low (Co hates it) so we can negotiate for these improvements but unfortunately Vacation Low will have to be altered. Thoughts????
just thinking we could negotiate Vac Low for the other improvements such as higher credits, rigs, productive pairings etc
I really don't know anything about ASA's PBS or what "vacation low" is, but I do know that negotiating in public by telling everyone what you value and what you'll give up is very, very stupid!
So when no one can agree on what bidding system we have and we finally go to an arbitrator. The company says "We want PBS" and the union says "We don't want PBS". Who wins?
Well the arbitrator is going to look at the industry to find the industry standard. That is going to be PBS. So what do you think they'll decide on?
Who doesn't have PBS? XJT, Eagle, and Comair maybe?
Now if we focused our energies on improving control over pairing construction and rules that surround our PBS we may not have to go to an arbitrator.