Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republican Candidates position on NLRB!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
free country, write your elected offical, tell him you want 'Right to Work" outlawed. BTW The unions in Germany are under Gov't control. The gov't has the right to void a union contract if it does not increase productivity, one of the reason the Germans do so well. I bet they don't have 76 job classifications in their assembly plants.


Duoooh! Pesky facts getting in the way again.
 
A) I have written ad nauseum

B) I would gladly take the German domestic economic plan over ours. Having spent a lot of time there, I feel well enformed in saying so much.
 
I mean, does anyone really think the R's want to cut YOUR taxes? it's the top 1% they care about. at least the D's now want to keep people below $250K where they're at and only raise taxes on those making more... which frankly would go a LONG way to paying down this overblown debt.. we're at the lowest marginal tax rates in decades for the top 1% and yet they want to keep cutting..


Have you ever known someone with a decent income that had a serious debt problem. If you gave them a raise, do you think they would begin to pay down their debt, or rationalize how they could afford the payment on the new car, boat, home remodel, vacation, etc? For most people is it not an income problem, it is a behavioral problem. They do not know how to behave with their money. Our government is no different.

Raising taxes on any group will not solve the debt/deficit problem. If you give them more money, they will find more ways to spend it. The only thing that will solve the debt/deficit is for Congress and our President (Both Parties) to make the hard choices and finally decide to live on less than they make. Unfortunately they would have to say NO to certain groups, individuals, countries, etc. For political reasons, none of them are willing to do that. Cut someones funding equals lose someones vote, and votes are all that matter. We will never pay down this overblown debt until the behavior of all the people in charge of our tax dollars changes.
 
And that's the crux of the debate- some want govt to do more- others want private companies to do more- for me, I do not care as long as there is pressure to be more efficient- and w/ some of the corporations running in the US these days- I don't forget or ignore that private companies can often be pretty damn inefficient and have a lot of red tape-
Look- everyone gets up in arms when a city or state manager gets over $200k a year, managing $billions- but the same private sector exec pulling in $millions upon obscene millions doesn't get people to bat an eye-

Rich overpaid is a problem
 
Have you ever known someone with a decent income that had a serious debt problem. If you gave them a raise, do you think they would begin to pay down their debt, or rationalize how they could afford the payment on the new car, boat, home remodel, vacation, etc? For most people is it not an income problem, it is a behavioral problem. They do not know how to behave with their money. Our government is no different.

Raising taxes on any group will not solve the debt/deficit problem. If you give them more money, they will find more ways to spend it. The only thing that will solve the debt/deficit is for Congress and our President (Both Parties) to make the hard choices and finally decide to live on less than they make. Unfortunately they would have to say NO to certain groups, individuals, countries, etc. For political reasons, none of them are willing to do that. Cut someones funding equals lose someones vote, and votes are all that matter. We will never pay down this overblown debt until the behavior of all the people in charge of our tax dollars changes.


that's a good point but the fact remains that the top tax rates are at historical lows when you look back over the past 70 years, and add to that in the past 30 years, military spending has gone up more than any other segment, including all social spending.. so the reality is we're wanting socialist retirement benefits and programs (i.e. social security, medicare, tri-care, etc..) but we don't want to pay the taxes necessary to support those costs.. and by "we" I mean the top income earners..
 
military spending has gone up more than any other segment, including all social spending.. so the reality is we're wanting socialist retirement benefits and programs (i.e. social security, medicare, tri-care, etc..) but we don't want to pay the taxes necessary to support those costs.. and by "we" I mean the top income earners..
that is BS, mil spending a a % of GNP is approaching all time lows since WWII, social spending i.e. Medicare, Social Security, WIN, unemployment is at an all time high as a % of GNP.
Rich overpaid is a problem
yea, lets kill'em like the Russians or run them out of the country like the British with a 99% tax rate.
 
Last edited:
that's a good point but the fact remains that the top tax rates are at historical lows when you look back over the past 70 years, and add to that in the past 30 years, military spending has gone up more than any other segment, including all social spending.. so the reality is we're wanting socialist retirement benefits and programs (i.e. social security, medicare, tri-care, etc..) but we don't want to pay the taxes necessary to support those costs.. and by "we" I mean the top income earners..

As I recall, it was the military that just took out Osama. I say money well spent. We all don't want socialistic benefits. You do. I see no reason why someone who earns a living should pay for someone who doesn't. You want it to be fair? Flat tax based on consumption. You buy a mega yacht with your millions you pay taxes on it. You buy a six pack of Natural Light, you pay taxes on it. Everyone makes choices and everyone pays the same percentage. At 38, I own my home, no mortgage. I did that by spending less than I earn and putting the difference to my debts. I owe nobody. Why should I pay more to help those that are not willing to sacrifice like my wife and I have for the last 7 years. If I can do it on an airline salary, the government can do it with my tax dollars. And I sure don't expect any social programs to help me when I'm older. I've taken care of myself by investing since I was 19. If you're not willing to make the hard choices, like doing without the latest and greatest so you can fund your IRA, then that's your problem. Lots of my friends had cool cars and gadgets while I was on a budget. Want and need are two different things. I learned the difference at a very young age and I am reaping the benefits now, yet you expect me to share that with others. No thanks, get your own. Go pick up a Dave Ramsey book. Read it for yourself and then pass it on to your elected official.
 
yea, lets kill'em like the Russians or run them out of the country like the British with a 99% tax rate.

Hey, there's a price to pay for everything..
 
As I recall, it was the military that just took out Osama. I say money well spent. We all don't want socialistic benefits. You do. I see no reason why someone who earns a living should pay for someone who doesn't. You want it to be fair? Flat tax based on consumption. You buy a mega yacht with your millions you pay taxes on it. You buy a six pack of Natural Light, you pay taxes on it. Everyone makes choices and everyone pays the same percentage. At 38, I own my home, no mortgage. I did that by spending less than I earn and putting the difference to my debts. I owe nobody. Why should I pay more to help those that are not willing to sacrifice like my wife and I have for the last 7 years. If I can do it on an airline salary, the government can do it with my tax dollars. And I sure don't expect any social programs to help me when I'm older. I've taken care of myself by investing since I was 19. If you're not willing to make the hard choices, like doing without the latest and greatest so you can fund your IRA, then that's your problem. Lots of my friends had cool cars and gadgets while I was on a budget. Want and need are two different things. I learned the difference at a very young age and I am reaping the benefits now, yet you expect me to share that with others. No thanks, get your own. Go pick up a Dave Ramsey book. Read it for yourself and then pass it on to your elected official.

Pass me some of that yummy Koolaid... I need a dose of lala land.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top