Republican Candidates position on NLRB!

[rigger]

I don't suppose that has anything to due with the fact that all of the big three automakers were in the tank.

Probably not, Incase you missed the article, but hey I am sure it is just a coinkedink aint it?:

DETROIT (WWJ) – According to a*****new report, 47 percent of Detroiters are *****”functionally illiterate.” The alarming new statistics*****were released*****by the Detroit Regional Workforce Fund on Wednesday.
WWJ Newsradio 950 spoke with the*****Fund’s Director, Karen Tyler-Ruiz, who explained exactly what this means.
“Not able to fill out basic forms, for getting a job — those types of basic everyday (things). Reading a prescription; what’s on the bottle, how many you should take… just your basic everyday tasks,” she said.
“I don’t really know how they get by, but they do. Are they getting by well? Well, that’s another question,” Tyler-Ruiz said.
Some of the Detroit suburbs also have high numbers of functionally illiterate: 34 percent in Pontiac and 24 percent in Southfield.**********
“For other major urban areas, we are a little bit on the high side… We compare, slightly higher, to Washington D.C.’s urban population, in*****certain ZIP codes in Washington D.C. and in Cleveland,” she said.
Tyler-Ruiz said only 10 percent of those who can’t read have gotten any help to resolve it.
The report will be used to provide better training for local workers.

 

[Jetjockey]

Well here's to hoping that Sarah Palin or Donald Trump is the best the GOP can come up with.

 

[rigger]

Well here's to hoping that Sarah Palin or Donald Trump is the best the GOP can come up with.

SURE AS HELL BEATS THE ONE THE DEMS ARE STANDING BEHIND.....AND THEY SUCK! Sad state of affairs

 

[PCL_128]

The original post in this thread has a couple of things mixed up. The NLRB didn't recently change a rule on how voting takes place. They've always had voting the normal way, with a non-vote not counting as a vote against. Nobody is challenging their voting system, either. The article that was linked was talking about the Boeing dispute, which isn't related to voting, it's related to the location of the factory and Boeing's motivation to put it there.

The voting dispute is a separate issue, and it deals with the National Mediation Board (NMB), not the NLRB. The NMB recently changed the voting rules to match the NLRB's rules, and the Republicans are trying to change it back to screw over airline and railroad labor.

 

[waveflyer]

SURE AS HELL BEATS THE ONE THE DEMS ARE STANDING BEHIND.....AND THEY SUCK! Sad state of affairs

Too many in our ranks think like this- over-emotional ranters against our own best interests.
Agree, we are our own worst enemy. We can't continue to operate like this politically. Either convince the GOP that we are worth making an exception to their union beliefs- or vote democrat, and make damn sure they know the only reason they got your vote is support of our unions- or decertify our unions and open everyone's positions to free market competition. Then live with the result. At least then you all wouldn't be hypocrits.

If you vote GOP and start to think about some others contribution to the 'race to the bottom', stop- look in the mirror and know there was no other consequence.

 

[Jetjockey]

SURE AS HELL BEATS THE ONE THE DEMS ARE STANDING BEHIND.....AND THEY SUCK! Sad state of affairs

Enjoy your next 6 years.

 

[27 driver]

Too many in our ranks think like this- over-emotional ranters against our own best interests.
Agree, we are our own worst enemy. We can't continue to operate like this politically. Either convince the GOP that we are worth making an exception to their union beliefs- or vote democrat, and make damn sure they know the only reason they got your vote is support of our unions- or decertify our unions and open everyone's positions to free market competition. Then live with the result. At least then you all wouldn't be hypocrits.

If you vote GOP and start to think about some others contribution to the 'race to the bottom', stop- look in the mirror and know there was no other consequence.

Please provide examples how this administration or any other liberal administration has helped this profession. You like to think that the left is not controlled by big business. Who is Obama's biggest contributor. What improvements have you seen since 2008? Once again... no substance and all name calling. Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid? Besides, our careers are not the only thing that drives votes. Believe it or not we are not the center of the universe.

 

[rigger]

Besides GASP i can actually negotiate a deal for myself and my family and then actually live with the consequences of my negotiated deal and actually be responsible for myself and family without any union or other person or govt entity being involved cause ANOTHER GASP I still have free will and a pair of balls!

I mean hell the country is so much better now then 2 years ago, or 4 years ago, or 6 years ago or 8 years ago or 10 years ago.....o wait, i can see why you are so attached to a party it works so well for America and its citizens.....

 

[Jetjockey]

Besides GASP i can actually negotiate a deal for myself and my family and then actually live with the consequences of my negotiated deal and actually be responsible for myself and family without any union or other person or govt entity being involved cause ANOTHER GASP I still have free will and a pair of balls!

I mean hell the country is so much better now then 2 years ago, or 4 years ago, or 6 years ago or 8 years ago or 10 years ago.....o wait, i can see why you are so attached to a party it works so well for America and its citizens.....

I keep forgetting how wonderful things were under 8 years of GW, and a GOP controlled congress.

 

[Jetjockey]

Please provide examples how this administration or any other liberal administration has helped this profession. You like to think that the left is not controlled by big business. Who is Obama's biggest contributor. What improvements have you seen since 2008? Once again... no substance and all name calling. Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid? Besides, our careers are not the only thing that drives votes. Believe it or not we are not the center of the universe.

Enjoy. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/washington/02labor.html

 

[waveflyer]

Please provide examples how this administration or any other liberal administration has helped this profession. You like to think that the left is not controlled by big business. Who is Obama's biggest contributor. What improvements have you seen since 2008? Once again... no substance and all name calling. Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid? Besides, our careers are not the only thing that drives votes. Believe it or not we are not the center of the universe.

Please note where I name called?

I'll just leave Dems as benefitting us by not actively screwing us like the GOP. If you don't see that... You're inconvincable.

But another question- why would Dems even contemplate helping us specifically when a solid majority of us work actively against them and
demonize all liberals?- if they could, I think they would work against us, but it doesn't work politically to ever be anti-union as a democrat. And that's the benefit- democrats get many votes through supporting unions- they generally cannot take anti-union actions- they are not pro-active at helping us bc we DO NOT VOTE FOR THEM. but at least they mostly stay out of our way-

(ps- if you're only example of them working against us is Clinton intervening on AA- that's weak- and not remotely comparable to the money grab, pension stealers that the GOP facilitated in the post 9/11 world. )

In this case - hypocrit isn't a name call- it's accurate- cashing a union paycheck while militantly protecting your own seniority rights against free market competition, while simultaneously voting anti-union can be called nothing else. Tell me where I'm wrong....?

 

[pilotyip]

Remember it is the Dem's who brought us the tremendous airline growth in the last two decades of the 1900's, created a five fold growth in airline jobs, and opened the skies to many more travelers. De-reg was a fantastic event for the airlines industry.

 

[Jetjockey]

Remember it is the Dem's who brought us the tremendous airline growth in the last two decades of the 1900's, created a five fold growth in airline jobs, and opened the skies to many more travelers. De-reg was a fantastic event for the airlines industry.

The GOP starting with Reagan who declared open season on Union labor. Then A GOP congress, and Bush Sr. who stood by while Frank Lorenzo killed union labor at Continental, and Eastern Airlines.

Yeah.....that helped the labor cause.

 

[Jetjockey]

Let's look at some current issues.

Q. Who wanted to pass a law making it possible to use the cockpit voice recorder to arbitrarily against pilots?
A. Republican Jim Demint (SC)

Q. Who is delaying the rule to change rest rules, and trying to strip certain segments of aviation out of protections?
A) Republican James Inhofe (OK)

Q. Who wants to change the way Unions organize, to make it more difficult for workers to organize?
A. Republican John Mica (FL)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/...union-legislation-in-FAA-reauthorization-bill

Q. Who wants to tie the FAA's hands in making new rules, to make sure they don't financially burden the airlines?
A. Republicans

It goes on and on.

While I don't think the Democrats are utopia, they don't hate labor like the Republicans.

 

[acpilot]

Perhaps if you had a marketable skill you wouldn't need a union? There is generally only one thing pilot can do well and that one thing is to fly an airplane...and managers know it. Where else are you going to go if you don't get what you want?

While we're posting wild ideas like that the GOP's intention is to screw pilots or that unions are good, let me throw one out there. Require advanced degrees to be a 121 pilot. It would sure thin the ranks of eligible applicants and companies would pay a premium for qualified individuals to keep their planes flying. This, of course, would require actual effort on the part of pilots wishing to keep their jobs, and we all know that we are commercial pilots because we hate actually working. Somebody thinks those degrees are valuable. They may not make you a better pilot, but they must be good for something...

From a union POV:

My point is that until you can get up and walk away from a bargaining table you really have no power. Sure, you can strike, but you run a good chance of pulling an Eastern and screwing not only yourselves, but EVERY EMPLOYEE, out of a job. How labor friendly is that?

When you can get up, walk away, and find gainful employment elsewhere, you'll have real, sustainable power over your "evil" management. It' not a republican or democrat thing, it's an inherent value thing.

 

[Jetjockey]

SO being a pilot isn't a marketable skill? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/marketable

Seems to be marketable to me. I've made a pretty good living off it for the last 25 years. I think the point you're trying to make is that Piloting is highly specialized and more of a skilled labor set. We are sadly tied to the success of our airlines with the seniority systems that has been in place for just about forever. The only protections we have with the current system are our individual contracts.

If pilots could free themselves from the Railway Labor Act, and recognizance we need a true National Union, with a National Seniority list, we might actually get somewhere in a free market. I know the idea was discussed while deregulation was pending. The concept of controlling entrants whether through minimum education, exams, would better control the number and quality of applicants. Purely a pipe dream I'd say. We can't even get congress to agree on minimum flight times that are realistic, let alone restrictions that would decrease the flow of "cheap" labor supply regional airlines depend on.

The real world dictates otherwise. Airline managers have always enjoyed a glut of pilots willing to step on, over, and do whatever it took to get on that seniority list ASAP.

 

[Rick James]

Why do some airline employees vote Republican?

Answer: Because they are stupid. They live with their heads buried in the sand, not concerned with anything around them as long as it doesn't affect them personally at that moment in time. They research nothing. They listen to right-wing AM talk show bigots like Rush Limbaugh and get the rest of their distorted information from corporate controlled right-wing news organizations like Fox News - the mouthpiece of the Republican Party.

And then when pro-management scab material like Pilotyip come calling, along with other Republican corporate lapdogs like Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, the Tea Baggers, and the rest of the GOP House majority...to take away their worker and union rights, they sit there deaf and dumb wondering how this could have happened to them. Then they'll go on to defend their insane right wing political ideology as their career ship goes down, missing the point entirely as they exclaim in their last breath how "it's a right to work state".

"Right-To-Work" is a misnomer created by the Republican fear machine to cause dissention amongst the uneducated and apathetic that by somehow living in a certain state, that state gives you the right to work whereas other states do not. This is what the Republican party does best - Lie.

"Right-To-Work" is just a cover for its true meaning - To suppress or eliminate workers Right-To-Unionize.

The Republican Party has always been and will always be anti-union, anti-worker, anti-middle class. Their masters are the Corporations and the Rich. To vote for any Republican is to put a nail in your own coffin. They will NEVER have the People's best interests in mind, although they'll spin it 7 ways to Sunday to try to make you believe they do. The facts of history speak for themselves.

Wow, you really seem to have a grasp of broad generalizations and name calling. I wouldn't dare debate you as I can tell where it would lead. However, I would enjoy flying with you as I'm sure you wouldn't have the same tone in person. Good luck with all that pent-up internet rage.

 

[acpilot]

SO being a pilot isn't a marketable skill? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/marketable

Seems to be marketable to me. I've made a pretty good living off it for the last 25 years. I think the point you're trying to make is that Piloting is highly specialized and more of a skilled labor set. We are sadly tied to the success of our airlines with the seniority systems that has been in place for just about forever. The only protections we have with the current system are our individual contracts.

Fair enough. I see that the literal definition of "marketable" may be sufficient for some. When a furloughed pilot is against the ropes, the practical definition of "marketable" varies significantly from what you find in the dictionary. I don't think my point was lost on everyone.

Not so much "skilled" as "pigeonholed"...in my experience, anyway.

Individual (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/individual) contracts or collective agreements? I'd rather have an individual contract...but that's me.

If pilots could free themselves from the Railway Labor Act, and recognizance we need a true National Union, with a National Seniority list, we might actually get somewhere in a free market. I know the idea was discussed while deregulation was pending. The concept of controlling entrants whether through minimum education, exams, would better control the number and quality of applicants. Purely a pipe dream I'd say. We can't even get congress to agree on minimum flight times that are realistic, let alone restrictions that would decrease the flow of "cheap" labor supply regional airlines depend on.

Of course what I posted is a pipe dream. The unions would never support it. It would make unions obsolete and that would put a dent in their income. All I'm saying is that it would work in improving compensation packages for pilots.

How would a national list be anything like a free market? You're still artifically inflating the value of pilot labor. It's the easy, unsustainable way to get more money without actually increasing your inherent value. It might work for awhile, but it's not a long term solution.

The real world dictates otherwise. Airline managers have always enjoyed a glut of pilots willing to step on, over, and do whatever it took to get on that seniority list ASAP.

I agree, seniority lists are a problem.

I'll go away now...

 

[27 driver]

Please note where I name called?

I'll just leave Dems as benefitting us by not actively screwing us like the GOP. If you don't see that... You're inconvincable.

But another question- why would Dems even contemplate helping us specifically when a solid majority of us work actively against them and
demonize all liberals?- if they could, I think they would work against us, but it doesn't work politically to ever be anti-union as a democrat. And that's the benefit- democrats get many votes through supporting unions- they generally cannot take anti-union actions- they are not pro-active at helping us bc we DO NOT VOTE FOR THEM. but at least they mostly stay out of our way-

(ps- if you're only example of them working against us is Clinton intervening on AA- that's weak- and not remotely comparable to the money grab, pension stealers that the GOP facilitated in the post 9/11 world. )

In this case - hypocrit isn't a name call- it's accurate- cashing a union paycheck while militantly protecting your own seniority rights against free market competition, while simultaneously voting anti-union can be called nothing else. Tell me where I'm wrong....?

Yes we vote against the in general. Yet we pay union dues to worthless unions who give them millions. Kind of ironic isn't it. I would be willing to bet it was liberal judges that allowed the "pension stealing" to happen. You want to define "hypocrit" look no further your current president. He has broken every promise he campaigned on. We shall have to agree to disagree. Like I said before.....neither party has done ******************** to help our profession. They all pander to big business. And by the way, my union doesn't pay me. I pay them.

 

[waveflyer]

Acpilot- now we're talking- I personally believe most 121 pilots are operating below a market wage bc of seniority- mgmt knows we rather lose a limb than start over like a kid out of college by changing companies-
I only dream of a free market for pilots- while in the real world we all wave to each other as we cross-cross the skies on bad commutes for companies most of us believe to be evil....
What if we could punish those airlines and quit to work for someone else-
In our socialistic system, that's not a reasonable choice until the company you work for is on death row...