Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republic UX EMB-170 Picture!!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I, for one, think its a sharp looking aircraft.



Can we end the COEX vs. the world pissing match for just one thread and admire a purdy airplane?
 
The funny thing is... it shows that people at CHQ can make MORE than a living wage at CHQ.... Once I figure out how to post the pay stub you would see that it is true... sadly someone would claim that it is BS since they are not holding it in their hand but I have seen it with my own eyes...... when I figure out how I shall post it.....needless to say those that have said that it is not possible to make more than $100K at CHQ or however much are now inserting foot in mouth...... stay tuned.......
 
Boilerup... all tho you may be Perdue... I still respect you for bringing to lite the idea behind thiz post..... it looks good.... I hope the seats are comfortable enuf for a LONG leg.....?
 
Yes, it is a purdy plane. Very roomy, and the LCD displays up front are sweet. It would beat an XR hands down for comfort from IAH-YYZ, EWR-OKC, etc.

As for the other subject of this thread (sorry, it's like crack, I just can't help myself!), if you include profit sharing like mgt. wants, we've already been offered more than CMR makes now. Our NC said not no, but HELL NO! There is a large proportion of our pilot group that would burn this place down for only 5% over CMR, so you had better believe it will happen for 5% below. Of course a strike will probably never happen since CAL will be crippled almost immediately. You CHQ guys are right that what you settled for will in the end have little impact on what we get. But it sure has an impact on how much longer our mgt. gets to hold onto our retro $.
 
SizzleChest said:
..... when I figure out how I shall post it....

By that comment you show that even you have no idea how someone could be making $50,000 in 4 months at CHQ.

That's $12,500 a month and even at 100 hours each month his hourly rate would have to be $125/hr. Actually it would have to be more than that since we haven't even finished out the 4th month yet.

SizzleChest said:
..needless to say those that have said that it is not possible to make more than $100K at CHQ or however much are now inserting foot in mouth..

I don't think it will be the nay-sayers that will be eating shoe leather.
 
Here's a cut and paste.....

Regular 37.5@$61.29
Above Guar. 4.0
Over Guar. 31.07
Prev. Adjust 40.1
PDO 31.93

IOE $1,018
Early Report $50

Stub Gross $9,931.94
YTD Gross $46,605.57
 
Back to the subject at hand it is a very nice picture. Hopefully we will see more of these birds.
 
it was meant to be previous month adjustment.... he said he was shorted the prior month on time... I should make him respond to all this...
 
Mark Twain said you should never argue with a fool because people might not be able to tell the difference.

Guess what? I sure as shootin' can't tell the difference. I wonder if he took into account that all parties might fit the definition of fool.

Don't all you fools ever get tired of proving the wrong point?
 
mckpickle said:
Oh its already being Brought.....jerkoff. See heres the thing. We will be paid higher than CHQ. Heck we've already been offered your crap. But we are not going to settle. We are sick and fed up and would rather be unemployed than take what you have.


Don't even try and argue with this guy. All he and others like him are doing is setting us up to be the reason why he can't get Comair + 5 percent.

Never mind 9-11 and the recession. It's our spineless backs that gave us the contract.

Whatever.
 
5 yr. CA $64.35
12 yr. CA $80.01
Max (16) $89.90
4 yr. FO (max) 33.50

I think NWA makes about $192/hr plus work rules plus retirement for flying the same size plane (DC-9-10). CHQ flying 170s is UAL mgt's wet dream.
 
9/11?

9/11 and a recession? When are you guys going to wake up and see the truth? These two events have caused a windfall, not trouble, for the small jet provider industry. The majors are bleeding red and the bottomfeeders can't grow fast enough to grab all the flying coming their way from UAL and AAA. If anything, small jet wages should be going up to close the gap as so much major flying is coming our way.

The reason for the race to the bottom is the unadulterated greed of Jonathan Ornstein and Bryan Bedford, and the unwillingness of their pilot groups to dig in and fight back. (now add Mesaba to the list). 9/11 is a large cause of the race to the bottom at the majors, but not at our level.
 
SizzleChest said:
Boilerup... all tho you may be Perdue... I still respect you....


Sizzle,

You STILL respect him ??? That's big of you. What's THAT about ?
 
Re: 9/11?

Dewey Oxberger said:
9/11 and a recession? When are you guys going to wake up and see the truth? These two events have caused a windfall, not trouble, for the small jet provider industry. The majors are bleeding red and the bottomfeeders can't grow fast enough to grab all the flying coming their way from UAL and AAA. If anything, small jet wages should be going up to close the gap as so much major flying is coming our way.

The reason for the race to the bottom is the unadulterated greed of Jonathan Ornstein and Bryan Bedford, and the unwillingness of their pilot groups to dig in and fight back. (now add Mesaba to the list). 9/11 is a large cause of the race to the bottom at the majors, but not at our level.



Where have You been???

Wake up!!!!
 
Where have I been? Uh, see above and absorb logic please. Too bad I have to go to work for 4 days now. You all have a nice week!
 
CitationLover said:


besides i think a 4yr captain at mesa makes more than a 4yr fo at comair. it seems those with crappy contracts have the growth (and with that better OVERALL salaries in terms of real dollars) rather than the high QOL/rates contracts at comair/air whiskey. that's too bad because those at comair/air whiskey have earned it.

bottom line: worry about yourself and don't blame your troubles on others.

This a very short-sighted and narrow view of the general labor industry and, more specifically, the regional airline industry. All improvements for future labor contracts depend on two things: the state of the industry and the quality of proceeding contracts.

We all know you can't get much improvement on your labor contract (much less hold onto what you already have) if your company isn't doing well financially and growing. We all know that you can't get much improvement on your contract if others' proceeding contracts are crappy. It's nearly impossible to raise the bar in a new contract in addition to and then above and beyond what is already out there. Basically you can't go from one directly to four if steps two and three aren't accomplished elsewhere.

So, to just sit idle worrying yourself and ignoring the fact that your airline's subpar contrct has no bearing or effect on the rest of the industry is, at best, a retarded view of the labor industry. When regional airlines are making record profits (a must for contract improvement) and it's own labor sells themselves short for growth opportunities (which would've happened anyhow but at the expense of the investor not the employee) and to make Captain quickly at a sh1tty airline, you've sold your soul to the Devil and F'ed everybody else. Shame on you!!!

I'm glad as hell to get out of that game. Let everybody else fight for the table scraps. Independence is bliss.

Tailwinds...
 
aewanabe said:
Great. Good luck. I believe you should get more than we did easily... and I've already explained why. Short recap: 250 planes vs. 80, exclusive jet feed for CO vs. contract carrier for several ailing majors, and NO REPUBLIC. Remember that?

Okay, good. Now here's where I'm calling BS. I seriously doubt you'll get Comair plus a bunch. I'll be surprised if you get what Comair has now, and I'll be shocked if you actually shut the place down for, say, Comair minus 5 percent. And when you say you'd rather be unemployed than work for what we got, why wait? You're working for less than us right now, so if you quit tomorrow you can violate the RLA and be unemployed right now. Then you start applying to Comair, Air Whisky or wherever else. I've already said that I don't think our payrates are good enough, but I fully believe they were the best we could get in our negotiating environment. Besides, guess what? We had the Mesa contract slapped in our faces, and we still bettered their contract by quite a bit, in all areas. So now it's your turn. Take what you don't like (pay) about my contract, and use it to go UP from there. And seriously, good luck. And try to stop with the whining, name-calling and all that. It doesn't make your pilot group look any better, or accomplish anything. (Although I'm probably having better luck teaching my 3 year old that than trying to get it across a message board:D )


You will never know for sure if it was the best you could of got. You folded too early. You may be right, but you will never know. Just wanted to correct your statement.
 
Dewey Oxberger said:
5 yr. CA $64.35
12 yr. CA $80.01
Max (16) $89.90
4 yr. FO (max) 33.50

I think NWA makes about $192/hr plus work rules plus retirement for flying the same size plane (DC-9-10). CHQ flying 170s is UAL mgt's wet dream.


That is unreal. I knew they worked cheap, but I had no idea they agreed to those kind of wages. It just shows what mgt. can get away with with a group with no back bone. Pathetic, just pathetic.
Why do I care. These slave wages will have a direct affect on my future earning potential. We at Comair are under paid as it is, and now we have these people agreeing to these kind of wages.
 
Dewey Oxberger said:
5 yr. CA $64.35
12 yr. CA $80.01
Max (16) $89.90
4 yr. FO (max) 33.50

I think NWA makes about $192/hr plus work rules plus retirement for flying the same size plane (DC-9-10). CHQ flying 170s is UAL mgt's wet dream.

Couple of things...You're rates are all first year. We have only a handful of 16+ year pilots. The actually Topout at the end of the 4 year deal is around 108,000K I think.

You're quote on NWA pilots is really vague. 192/hr...is that FOs? Capts? Years of Service? So if a NW pilot gets 192/hr flying a 80 seater, that must mean at your company you get around $120/hr to fly a 50 seater...Right?

I also cant believe experienced airline pilots sit on here and bicker about nothing but payscales. Yes these rates need to be higher. But dont forget about many other things in a contract. You guys know what Im talking about. But payscales are just easier to quantify so thats what you see. The inter-hate between airline pilots is unreal and unlike most other industries out there. Do you see Pepsi truck drives giving the bird to Coke truck drivers?
 
I also cant believe experienced airline pilots sit on here and bicker

I can.
 
SizzleChest said:
I saw my buddy's last pay stub from CHQ and they have already cleared $50K for the year, before taxes.... I think our contract is OK...

I find it very hard to believe that by late April he has already made $50K. What equipment/longevity is this guy on? Does he do IOE, etc.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom