Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republic orders 40 C-Series Aircraft

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The difference is you're speaking in hypotheticals versus what the RAH group just DID IN REAL LIFE (ie 50% DROP in rates taking flying from a mainline group).

Midwest was never Mainline, you need to get over yourself. That's like saying SunCountry is mainline! You were a regional airline that flew boeing's version of a regional aircraft.
 
Last edited:
Midwest was never Mainline, you need to get over yourself. That's like saying SunCountry is mainline! You were a regional airline that flew boeing's version of a regional aircraft.


To clarify your statement oh wise one. MIDWEST was a non-legacy carrier using mainline equipment and we also operated our own regional brand. So yes, we were MAINLINE!
 
Where the hell did he say that? Nowhere. He'd say the exact opposite, which makes his point even more valid...that you have idiots flying large aircraft for less money than other pilots flying aircraft 1/3 the size!

If you're making crap money flying a 37 seater, and someone makes crappier money flying a 100 seater, I think it's ok to point that out.

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner!!!
 
I love flying! I love my job (I wouldn't like to deal with some of the crap that comes along with it however)... But it pains many to watch people taxi'ing around in 100 seat jets that pay crap. But thats how the industry has turned and like I said..... It is what it is!!

But Surf, how did that happen? Chautauqua and Mesa just didn't magically appear with jets. Your union, ALPA, with eyes wide open to the AAA MEC's intent, signed on the line and gave them the scope relief in 1995 (AAA Rakesh? Remember that name? Babbit? Remember that one?) Again in 2003 with the increase to 86 seats. Seems to me that PDT, along with ALG were thrown under the bus back then. But, you need to claim some ownership to your "pain" if you are still paying dues. I despise the pat rates at RAH, but, as a dues paying member, I'm involved trying to affect change. It may take some time, but I'm optimistic.

I responded earlier with the "you...too?" because it seems unlike you to be a conformer and jump on the Republic bashing threads...kinda surprised me.

T8
 
The difference is you're speaking in hypotheticals versus what the RAH group just DID IN REAL LIFE (ie 50% DROP in rates taking flying from a mainline group).

Here we go again. It's all the pilot's fault. Those mean RAH pilots.
 
Where the hell did he say that? Nowhere. He'd say the exact opposite, which makes his point even more valid...that you have idiots flying large aircraft for less money than other pilots flying aircraft 1/3 the size!

If you're making crap money flying a 37 seater, and someone makes crappier money flying a 100 seater, I think it's ok to point that out.

I think it is ok and fair to point out that it is PDT's 4th or 5th contract compared to the Chautauqua contract that was ratified in 2003 and presently 5 carriers that represent RAH negotiate are negotiating a new contract. I wouldn't shoot the horse, yet. It's about to get interesting with the seniority arbitration and contract amalgamations, etc.
 
I think it is ok and fair to point out that it is PDT's 4th or 5th contract compared to the Chautauqua contract that was ratified in 2003 and presently 5 carriers that represent RAH negotiate are negotiating a new contract. I wouldn't shoot the horse, yet. It's about to get interesting with the seniority arbitration and contract amalgamations, etc.

I don't think it should matter which contract it was. If pilots would demand industry standard work rules and pay at the first contract (I realize it's not easy), you'd never get regional airlines that expand so quickly because they are so cheap.

But the pilots at those regionals are only there for the quick upgrade, so they don't mind. Unfortunately they bring down the whole industry's pay rates. The "quick upgrade" is a cancer, and the excuse that the airline is too young is bogus.
 
I don't think it should matter which contract it was. If pilots would demand industry standard work rules and pay at the first contract (I realize it's not easy), you'd never get regional airlines that expand so quickly because they are so cheap.

But the pilots at those regionals are only there for the quick upgrade, so they don't mind. Unfortunately they bring down the whole industry's pay rates. The "quick upgrade" is a cancer, and the excuse that the airline is too young is bogus.

No, it is not that easy. Just ask the boys at PSA what happened in 2002 to get jets on their property.
 
Just like you did with the 190's. Try being realistic man; you're working for the #1 company that is ruining the industry. I don't know how you sleep at night.


It's quite simple really. By the time they get done jacking off to all the pictures of their company's E170-190-195 and now the C-Series of jets, they are so exhausted they have no choice but to sleep. Has anyone noticed that their Midwest branded planes don't even have an..."operated by repukelick airlines" painted anywhere on it in small print at least? Their passengers are totally oblivious to the fact that they are not being flown by an experienced, well trained and adequately compensated cockpit crew, but in fact are actually being flown by FO's with less than 1000 hours and CA's with not much more.
 
You're right. I just read between the lines.

But surely anyone who paid to fly the right seat in a Metro at Ameriflight should have the credibility to tell off the Republic pilots. :erm:

Pipejockey= pwned! Bah ! Mr. Buy-A-Job talks about inexperienced crews..What a joke.
 
I bet he doesn't reply to this thread again!!!!!!

Are you kidding me? Why the h*ll not? A 7 year old post? Let me repeat that for some of the slooower folks here like the self proclaimed sausage king who instead is probably nothing more than the king of fudge packing. A 7 YEAR OLD POST! A sub 1000 hour new hire you say? I didn't mention all the useless single engine Cessna time did I? I only mentioned the Multi and turbine time I had. Flying around the pattern for a thousand hours in a 172 is not going to better help you handle an airline job. I indeed had over 1000 hours.

And as far as Ameriflight...how in the hell is serving as an SIC in a metro for a part 135 cargo operation 10 years ago considered "buying a job"? Hey fudge packer, you can't buy a job that doesn't exist. The plane went whether the sic showed up or not. And with congress thankfully trying to get new hire minimums at 1500 total and an ATP, programs like Ameriflight's may be the best way to get new guys the airline experience necessary to not only get the 1500 but to get the real world experience in all kinds of weather and icing and environments they will encounter when they get to the regionals.

But seeing as how simple minded you are, I imagine that you would rather they drone around the sky in severe clear in a 172 or light twin for 1500 hours. Now go get a life because you surely have absolutely none if you can scrounge through 7 YEAR OLD POSTS! You bottom feeder!!
 
Oh and I might also add that 7 YEARS AGO, Chiiitaqua was not republic that I am aware of and was just another run of the mill RJ operator flying 50 seats or less. Now they consist of what was something like 3 different airlines flying 170-190 series of aircraft for 50 seat pay and who are getting 130 seaters which I am sure they will fly for cheap, not to mention how they put Midwest out of business and will destroy Frontier as well. What do you think those 130 seaters are going to be doing?

If you want to talk about buying a job, you best talk to all your fine colleagues who lined up around the block up until the late 90's or so, to actually get a job as a REQUIRED crewmember for just about all the main regionals of the time.
 
Last edited:
Considering Republic hasn't hired in almost 2 years, I doubt any FO has less than 1000 hours. And I think I read their Captain minumums were over 3000 hours.

Really? Then they must pull that bullsh*t where they count every 1 hour of sic at Repukelick, as 2 hours total for the purposes of meeting the 3,000 hour upgrade mins. Their junior CA's have been on the job 3 years. And with all the 500 hour or less new hires the regionals were hiring, most would need more than 3 years to get the 3,000 hours. And how would you explain how they pulled off getting 3,000 hours back when upgrades were 1 year?
 
Last edited:
Really? Then they must pull that bullsh*t where they count every 1 hour of sic at Repukelick, as 2 hours total for the purposes of meeting the 3,000 hour upgrade mins. Their junior CA's have been on the job 3 years. And with all the 500 hour or less new hires the regionals were hiring, most would need more than 3 years to get the 3,000 hours. And how would you explain how they pulled off getting 3,000 hours back when upgrades were 1 year?

RAH had hiring minimums of 1500/300 (with the exception of Delta Connection Academy, who needed only 800tt) until sometime in Q2'2007...and many pilots hired at that time had flown for places like CorpEx, Piedmont, Great Lakes, PSA, etc and didn't have any problem meeting the 1500/300 minimums or having enough time to upgrade to captain.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top