General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
General, you're not very good at BSing.
Just because the CRJ-200 are a POS and are going away slowly doesn't mean that's an indication of will be with scope and the other RJs that fly or the prospects for 100 seat jets at the regionals. Spin it any way you want but the legacies will never do 100% of their own flying or come close to that. You can't undo what is. You seen to think that's it's all about the pilots. To us it is but management will do what's good for themselves and the shareholders. I NEVER said legacies will do 100% of the flying. But, hopefully the legacies will regain some of what they lost over the years, and thankfully we are seeing that now. How many CR9s are going to Air Mekong btw? That never would have happened a couple years ago. But, if you hope to fly 100 seaters for DCI, I think your dreams will be shot down.
I have seen SLC evolve over the years and you most certainly haven't. Stop the BS with the Airbuses. They're their in SLC now to replace the Maddogs which went to MSP and they won't be picking up any additional flying. Since you mention PSC and Montana flying, when was the last time you looked at what's flying on the PSC and Montana routes you mentioned? Delta flys zero flights to PSC and zero flights to all places in Montana from SLC and it's zero flights to any of those places anytime soon. Could MD90s do transcons? No, they couldn't do it Westbound in the Winter. So A320s and A319s were brought in to do it all the way to SLC from the East Coast. That was the reason, combined with the MD90s being able to hit both Coasts from MSP. But, the A319s also have the correct load amount for certain Montana and Inter Mountain West towns--like JAC which they are doing now. Expect to see more in the near future, or certainly by next year. Have you seen any MD90s at BZN BTW? They have started 2 daily from MSP--which is a good thing.
When was the last time you taxied around SLC? Over at the "B" gates they're almost done with 4 new jetways. Gates B2 to B12 have always been for all the RJs though now just 900s part in those spots. Do you know what those jetways are for? They are for RJs and you don't have to be a genius to know based on what you're looking at, that the spots and jetways are too small for anything other then RJs. Yes, but notice how there are less and less RJs in C and D. You can have B, and all of the outer gates as well. A320s are doing more PHX, more SFO, and other places only RJs flew to just 6 months ago. Your CRJ2s have been kicked out to MSP, and who knows how long they will stay there. Your airline has had to change it's whole process of dealing with new airline contracts, like your MKE deal with Airtran. That is all on YOU GUYS--having to foot the bill for everything (gas, etc), hoping to turn any profit for yourselves. Might not happen, and your management normally doesn't act that way unless they are desperate. Can your refute that? Can you say Air Mekong? Laughable.
Comair and ASA have come and gone in SLC and Mesaba's presence there is suppose to be temporary. They've been there a year now operating just a few flights and no base...yet. I guess we will see. Supposedly they're there because Skywest couldn't cover all the flying. Here's something I know you don't know General, Skywest is doing at this time more flying for Delta then it has ever done in it's history. Do want to explain that? Sure there's going to be a reduction come winter but that's normal. Do you want to know just how pissed pilots in SLC are because we can't get time off? Sure, you know EXACTLY what will happen.....riiiiiight. DL will continue to keep all of the DCI regionals on the edge, so as not to allow any one carrier enough power to hurt the mainline in a strike. (remember the $1 billion fiasco with Comair? Maybe you don't....) It is great you are flying more, but also for Airtran, United, and DL. Same at mainline chief, get used to it.
Why do you think the UAL/CAL merger was structured to be with the United name and CAL just gets the their logo on the tail? Smisek went to the pilots atleast twice in the days and weeks before the announced merger to ask them for relief on scope and other things. (CAL pilots on here will vouch for that) Everytime the pilots said no. I bet if he got what he wanted the new merged company would be called Continental with the CAL logo on the tail. The failed talks now means nothing. Everyone is just jockeying for position. In the end scope will, at the very least, stay as per UAL's. This is something you guys are watching closely I bet. The UAL guys had to give Scope relief in BK, but now the stronger CAL guys and UAL guys have leverage over management. They can put a stop to the "synergies" that can add $400-500 million a year in added revenue if they do not get a joint contract, and Wall St is watching that. Do synergies always mean layoffs? Has DL laid off anyone? No, DL is starting to hire pilots again. The CAL guys DO NOT want 70 seaters (how many do you have flying for UAL?) and they will fight to make sure it doesn't happen again. I bet they will ask that at the end of your current contract, all jets over 50 seats go away, and also stop the Dash-8-400 revolution from continuing. I am sure the UAL guys would want the same, since your CR7s took over for the parked 737-300s and 735s at UAL. This will cause a huge glut of YOUR larger RJs if it comes true, and I don't think either pilot group wants to budge. Will Smisek and Tilton? They will if they want their huge bonuses and Wall St to be happy. I would start to worry big time if I were you. No spin here, just reality. You just never know. and you are just GUESSING that scope will stay the same. Ask any CAL or UAL guy on this board if that is what they want......
Enjoy the above.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Last edited: