Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does the union say?
The grievance will never be really settled, because it has no merit. There have been no contract violations. The MEC knows that. They probably filed the grievance to quell the natives. It is what is!
It is a contract violation. They put in place more restricted days than allowed. They just called them "red arrow days" to get around the clause.
They don't care about QOL and I don't care about A14 and CF. Simple.
It is a contract violation. They put in place more restricted days than allowed. They just called them "red arrow days" to get around the clause.
I can't even count the number of times I've been denied a swap for a trip on the exact same days only to see it given to someone junior to me. The reason given..."not enough reserves", even breaks it down for me and mysteriously its always the same ratio...32 reserves needed/31 available...funny how it can always be the same.There is no contract violation. Restricted days are not Red Arrow Days.
A Restricted Day is a day that Reserve Coverage is "below" adequate Reserve Coverage and on that day no swaps with open time will be allowed, but will allow pickups and pilot trades. The switch is "OFF." No swapping can occur on a Restricted day.
A Red Arrow Day indicates that the Reserve Coverage is at or near the Company's minimum, but adequate reserve staffing level to cover "only" unplanned absences and/or uncovered trips in Current Open Time. A swap may still be approved on a Red Arrow Day. Or, if not approved on the first attempt, may be approved the next day if a swap is resubmitted.
Read your contract.
I can't even count the number of times I've been denied a swap for a trip on the exact same days only to see it given to someone junior to me. The reason given..."not enough reserves", even breaks it down for me and mysteriously its always the same ratio...32 reserves needed/31 available...funny how it can always be the same.
I for one can't wait for real time open time that takes the human factor out of the approval process...come on PBS!
I call bullsh!t on this one! Sure, we have it good at ASA, that doesn't mean that we should just roll over and take it because its good for management! We have a contract, they have to follow it. Its simple really. If you want to get the furloughs back, then making them properly staff the airline is a very good start.You are correct, but I don't see us winning this one. Sometimes you get the devil and sometimes the devil gets you. It sucks, but given the overall state of things at our airline, between downgrades, furloughs, losing more aircraft soon and a terrible profit margin, we do have many other fish to fry.
And despite all that, we have much to be grateful for as far as pay and QOL compared to many of our contemporaries. Don't make me make a list.
But by all means, do take the time to chew your reps ears and beat this thing silly on the survey. It should be one of our top negotiating goals.
I call bullsh!t on this one! Sure, we have it good at ASA, that doesn't mean that we should just roll over and take it because its good for management! We have a contract, they have to follow it. Its simple really. If you want to get the furloughs back, then making them properly staff the airline is a very good start.
I'm no expert, but the way I read the language, they've got us by the short hairs on this one.
Is this worth further grievances? Yes
I'm with you outtahere. We operate more flights a day than previous years and with less people. We had 917 departures yesterday-that's more than a usual summer day. What will this summer hold for us?
So let me get this straight, you guys think that us signing in PBS is gonna get rid of red arrow days? HA! They will just have the computer set up to deny all trades on red arrow days. Thats probably what they are doing right now.