Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Raytheon in CMH

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
now Guitar, yes the BJ is a somewhat crappy plane at times, but looking at your plane flown list, I don't see BJ. Now don't take this post as support for the BJ, (i have 6 years flying the bucket) For the most part 4 or less people, this is a great plane.
 
dime line said:
now Guitar, yes the BJ is a somewhat crappy plane at times, but looking at your plane flown list, I don't see BJ. Now don't take this post as support for the BJ, (i have 6 years flying the bucket) For the most part 4 or less people, this is a great plane.

Thanks for noticing though. I just didnt bother to put that one up there, but if your going to be in recurrent pretty soon, I might see you there in ICT.
 
cmhslave yeah because rts wouldn't even come out for negotiations. What makes you think he's going to show up for this?
 
?

RNObased said:
Merger only happens between healthy companies.... If it happened it would be an aquistion... Major difference....

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - America West Holdings Corp. and bankrupt US Airways Group announced the two have reached a merger agreement.


…So I guess you would define US Air as a healthy company?
 
The 45 rooms are probably for all the additional union busters they think they’ll need because they are losing the war!
 
Spackler said:
NEWYORK (CNN/Money) - America West Holdings Corp. and bankrupt US Airways Group announced the two have reached a merger agreement.


…So I guess you would define US Air as a healthy company?

More viable the Options...

The meeting had to do with the piece of junk 400xp... The head of Raytheon I guess blamed the training of NJA crews for the poor performance of the aircraft. Maybe because we can read the performance charts.

He also blamed the Mx at NJA for the poor maintance record. Raytheon didn't accept any responsiblity for the fine aircraft... Too funny
 
The Mechs at the Raytheon Service Centers complain about the 400 also. Does that mean they are to blame for the poor reliability and performance. Give me a break! Maybe it's Netjets fault for the 4000/Horizon being delayed 3+ years on delivery. If they hadnt ordered them it would of been delivered on time! Raytheon needs to step up to the plate and take responsibility for the shortfalls and poor industry showing. I can't belive the 800 is such a solid jet comming from a company like this! Oh yea, the Britts build them!!!
 
RNObased said:
More viable the Options...

The meeting had to do with the piece of junk 400xp... The head of Raytheon I guess blamed the training of NJA crews for the poor performance of the aircraft. Maybe because we can read the performance charts.

He also blamed the Mx at NJA for the poor maintance record. Raytheon didn't accept any responsiblity for the fine aircraft... Too funny

RNO,

I have to apologize for my posts on this thread. I totally misread the beginning of it because I was drugged up on cold medicine. I was kinda responding to a different subject. Anyway, disregard anything I said previously on this thread.

Thanks
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top