KP,
I will attempt to give you an answer from my internal observations. Since you already have the "answer", you may disagree with my opinion but that is the great thing about FI.
If GK thought merging companies was going to harm the company's bottom line or significantly harm the culture, the deal wouldn't have gone through. He obviously believes the SWA employees can and will make this work with the help of highly motivated AirTran employees who he presumed would enjoy joining a company with a vastly different approach to their employees.
F9 and AAI situations are two very different situations; bankruptcy judges, tight timelines, different fleet types and a competing bidder for F9 assets (most folks forget that RAH outbid SWA and the creditors chose the $.18 a share offer vs. the $.12 a share offer from SWA...the SLI issue was a small reason among many for why it didn't go).
GK believes the SLI issue can be worked out among the two pilot groups. There is also a 24 month timeline (written into the SWA/SWAPA CBA) that is ticking that if the two operations can not be merged, SWA must come back to SWAPA and negotiate an extension to the 24 month timeline or seek other solutions.
Lots of what-ifs but at the end of the day this can be worked out in a "fair and reasonable" fashion, not pleasing all pilots mind you but one that can combine two solid operations into a great airline with huge potential for growth and expansion.
What is your explanation?
Thanks in advance,
Respectfully,