Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

(qualified?) pilot shortage round 2? MPL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Dornier 335

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Posts
1,089
link

IN FOCUS: Multicrew pilot licence numbers grow as it approaches proof of concept

At the end of 2013, ICAO will hold a proof-of-concept symposium for the multicrew pilot licence (MPL) adopted in 2006. The licence and training system could be rejected as inadequate - but is that likely? Not according to Capt Dieter Harms, a senior Lufthansa pilot also known as "father of the MPL" for his work with ICAO and the International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations to define the competency elements and performance requirements for a pilot operating as a part of an airline crew, on which the award of an MPL is based. There are more than 600 MPL-licensed pilots globally, Harms told the Royal Aeronautical Society's (RAeS) Flight Crew Training Conference in September, adding that "the vast majority are performing above the standards expected of graduates from the commercial pilot licence courses".

MPL take-up has been slow but is accelerating, Harms says: 50 US states recognise MPL, 16 countries have flight-training organisations that run MPL courses, and 20 airlines have set up partnerships with FTOs to train their pilots to MPL standards. Harms says that in December 2010, 1,000 MPL students enrolled, with 180 graduations. By September 2012, there were 1,900 enrolments and 600 MPL graduations. ICAO says future qualifications for pilots and air traffic controllers will be subject to the same competency measurements used to define MPL requirements. The organisation makes it clear this is the only viable route not only to measurable competency, but to unified global standards in licensing aviation professionals.

LINE EXPERIENCE
Mitchell Fox, ICAO chief of flight operations at the Air Navigation Bureau, said at the RAeS conference that once on the line, recurrent training for pilots and controllers will be increasingly shaped by evidence of training needs, rather than performance of statutory exercises which Harms calls "inventory-based training".

The new concept, known as evidence-based training, is already in use by some carriers such as Emirates. The use of line experience to determine what is required, and adopting the concept of training pilots to competency in particular manoeuvres or scenarios rather than only testing them on a pass/fail basis, will bring a new culture to recurrent training.
Harms explains the basis for the new emphasis on competency-based - rather than hours-based - training that arrived with the MPL: "It is based on the insight that inventory-based training and the repetition of past accident scenarios is insufficient to prepare pilots and crews to successfully handle the infinite number of unforeseeable situations they might face and that only the existence and the continuous application of a set of core competencies enable pilots and crews to operate safely, efficiently and effectively, and manage the infinite number of abnormal situations in modern civil aviation."

The facts of modern aviation are that increased reliability will mean rarer technical occurrences, but increasing aircraft complexity also raises the chances that - when things do go wrong - the number of unforeseeable combinations of factors that could occur also increases.
Training, Harms argues, has to provide crews with the basic knowledge, skills and mental resilience to be able to deal with combinations of circumstances for which there is no checklist solution. It is proactive rather than reactive training, he adds, predicting: "Be assured, MPL will continuously grow. The recovery from the current crisis will augment this trend, provided that the international airline training and regulating community is able to facilitate a globally harmonised and standardised implementation."
 
The problem with MPL is not when the kids are sitting right seat with grandpa who has 25k hours and 50 years of real world life experience; rather the true problem with MPL will be when those kids upgrade at 1500 hours and a second MPL pilot is sitting in the right seat.

The threats that will kill people in this century are not the same as last century. Hopefully we are done hitting mountains, instead we're going to be hearing about junior forgetting to put gas in the tank before he left for Fargo.
 
Or hold the stick full aft while the airplane wallows in a stall from the Flight Levels until impact. ALPA can't say anything bad because we are part of the IFALPA. Yet another issue that are going to use my dues money against me. Wonderful.
 
Multi pilot crew license - what f'in genius came up with this? So you can "crew" an airbus but can't take a C-150 around the patch by yourself.

Holly crap, 20 years ago when I was 18 and a private pilot I never thought I be 38 and disappointed as to where my profession is heading.

Remember Kids - Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's safe or a good idea.
 
Last edited:
There are no more checks to haul. Most of the flight students are foreign students who will be able to come back to the US once ownership laws are changed. The 1500 hour rule will vaporize the few remaining pilots looking to pursue an airline career.

The MPL is the same sort of gamble that was taken when Airbus rolled out a FBW jet or when RJs were introduced. It will happen and the sky won't rain airplanes.

In one sense it's a good thing that any future pilot knows he's getting into a mediocre job that pays $40K rather than being deceived into believing there are $200K jobs out there.
 
All part of the coming hiring boom that started this year. Oh to be 33 years old again coming out of the Navy
 
All part of the coming hiring boom that started this year. Oh to be 33 years old again coming out of the Navy

Right on cue.

Yeah... nothing like getting out of the Navy at age 33, as a senior O-3, pulling over $100K/year in pay and benefits to roll the dice on a $30-40K year job with nothing to offer, for companies that just keep filing bankruptcy. Or better yet, competeing against 50,000 other guys for the handful of jobs at the 2-3 decent airlines out there who will at best be hiring collectively 300-500/year.
 
Right on cue.

Yeah... nothing like getting out of the Navy at age 33, as a senior O-3, pulling over $100K/year in pay and benefits to roll the dice on a $30-40K year job with nothing to offer, for companies that just keep filing bankruptcy. Or better yet, competeing against 50,000 other guys for the handful of jobs at the 2-3 decent airlines out there who will at best be hiring collectively 300-500/year.
Maybe if it was now I wouldn't get out, but back in 1977, my pay was about $20K/yr, just a little above starting pay as a DAL F/O.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top