Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Psa ta

  • Thread starter Thread starter superatr
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 26

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
typo? or the agreement?
"o First Officer longevity pay is capped at 4 years of service or the pilot’s actual years of service, whichever is greater."

If the agreement then no cap asi read it.
 
I think they're alluding to a variation of a "B-scale."

i.e. F/O pay is capped at year 4, unless you're already past it. Instead of saying, if you're hired after X date, you'll never make more than $X/hr.
 
Pilots are in the business of Threat and Error Management, which means you should always be looking for the worst case scenario.

So let's say you're a PSA FO, who just wants to get some PIC time and/or move on. Your worthless union presents you with this POS deal, and tells you there'll be new airplanes, upgrades galore, and guaranteed mainline interviews. What's not to like?

Please consider all the ways you could be screwed by the fine print. They deliver one new airframe by the deadline, then cancel the remaining orders. Or, they take delivery of all 30, and promptly send all the 200's to the desert. So no upgrades.

Then, they announce a single class of a whopping 300 people at mainline. Of these, only four will be PSA guys. Nevertheless, they line up 300 PSA pilots for interviews, and fail 296 of them. This is repeated in month 2, and now every PSA pilot has their pay frozen for the next 10 years. Amazingly, the new hire classes get cancelled anyway, but the damage is done.

What's that, you can't see airline managements colluding to exploit contract loopholes? Especially when mainline would benefit financially from screwing you over?

If this thing passes, I would be wary of flying on PSA due to an obvious display of poor Threat/Error Management skills.
 
Why are these TAs even being "TAed"? What's wrong with the PSA MEC? Can we name some names so people know who's behind this crap?

Go ahead, pull the trigger guys-- you'll get what you deserve. Pay caps and the sound of a giant flushing toilet. Take that home to the kids and put it on the table.
 
[FONT=&quot]Lastly, we are stunned by the lack of resistance exhibited from ALPA’s national officers, with the sole exception of Vice President of Administration and Eagle Captain Bill Couette. Our National Leadership has not led the way in this effort to “Stop the Whipsaw”.[/FONT]


Is any body really surprised?

Nooooooo, there's no conflict of interest.....

The new pattern bargaining norm?
 
What ALPA is doing to the regional carriers is disappointing. They don't seem to realize that a huge pay gap only increases outsourcing pressure on us.
 
Larger RJs and more or less a promised job. They'll take it. Not wise to mess with your wholly owning major. Look at comair


Laughable coming from Hulas's expert goat rimmer. Why don't you go back to licking your nuts, it's the only thing you can do well.
 
What ALPA is doing to the regional carriers is disappointing. They don't seem to realize that a huge pay gap only increases outsourcing pressure on us.

ALPA created what the regionals are now by being too good or thinking its too costly for them to keep the jets at mainline. No one to look at other than the pilots at each major when they decided not to scope their own brand. Oh well.
 
Maybe we should all be to the point that we don't gives a crap what anyone does anymore!! I think I'm over it.......... :-) Screw it... Votes yes!!!

Hell it will be fun to see what happens!
 
Last edited:
If these guys vote this pos in, there should be an informal ban on psa pilots at the majors. Don't recommend anyone from psa, blackball any applicant from psa. Then maybe then the regional industry will understand the ramifications of thier actions. If they don't look at their airline as just a stepping stone then maybe the industry might be worth half a damn.
 
Let's not rush anything, boys and girls. Your vote represents the preservation of your current compensation and work rules. If you willingly relinquish that compensation and contractual work rules protection, then you are simply a fool. It's like the elders used to say, a fool and his money are soon parted. Do you really want to be a component of ancient axioms?
 
If these guys vote this pos in, there should be an informal ban on psa pilots at the majors. Don't recommend anyone from psa, blackball any applicant from psa. Then maybe then the regional industry will understand the ramifications of thier actions. If they don't look at their airline as just a stepping stone then maybe the industry might be worth half a damn.

You don't understand that a crap contract like this is welcomed by the Majors pilots, as our low pay subsidizes their high pay. They don't WANT to "fix" the situation, and so will be more than happy to hire guys from every bottom-feeder out there, rationalizing that they (the benevolent Legacy hiring pilots) are "rescuing" these pilots from an unfortunate situation involving an inferior airline. The myopia is astounding.
 
You don't understand that a crap contract like this is welcomed by the Majors pilots, as our low pay subsidizes their high pay. They don't WANT to "fix" the situation, and so will be more than happy to hire guys from every bottom-feeder out there, rationalizing that they (the benevolent Legacy hiring pilots) are "rescuing" these pilots from an unfortunate situation involving an inferior airline. The myopia is astounding.

You both have it wrong. Management (HR) hires pilots, not line pilots. And who does management prefer? The pilots who stood their ground, or the pilots who caved? Look at the history of Delta hiring Comair pilots.

As for mainline pilots not wanting to "fix" the "situation" at the regionals, it's not our situation to fix, it's yours. I mean, really, are you suggesting that we should waive a magic and and integrate/staple all regional pilots? Take back all scope in one move. It can't happen.

The only think that's going to fix the race to the bottom is you guys refusing to play that game, and then accepting the consequences. I hate to promote GL, but one of the few things he's right about is that the 717s are going to decimate DCI RJ flying. The regionals are only going to become a bigger blood bath as 50 seaters get parked and the regionals shrink. If you don't have your applications out there, and get yourself ready to bail out, then you're part of the problem.
 
You don't understand that a crap contract like this is welcomed by the Majors pilots, as our low pay subsidizes their high pay. They don't WANT to "fix" the situation, and so will be more than happy to hire guys from every bottom-feeder out there, rationalizing that they (the benevolent Legacy hiring pilots) are "rescuing" these pilots from an unfortunate situation involving an inferior airline. The myopia is astounding.

That is correct
 
You both have it wrong. Management (HR) hires pilots, not line pilots. And who does management prefer? The pilots who stood their ground, or the pilots who caved? Look at the history of Delta hiring Comair pilots.

As for mainline pilots not wanting to "fix" the "situation" at the regionals, it's not our situation to fix, it's yours. I mean, really, are you suggesting that we should waive a magic and and integrate/staple all regional pilots? Take back all scope in one move. It can't happen.

The only think that's going to fix the race to the bottom is you guys refusing to play that game, and then accepting the consequences. I hate to promote GL, but one of the few things he's right about is that the 717s are going to decimate DCI RJ flying. The regionals are only going to become a bigger blood bath as 50 seaters get parked and the regionals shrink. If you don't have your applications out there, and get yourself ready to bail out, then you're part of the problem.
Box office, you make some good points but are off-base on others. You're right, management hires pilots, and management prefers pilots who cave. You're also right that the primary fix will ultimately end up being for regional pilots to not put up with this BS, and refuse to fly for what's being offered.

Where you're wrong: pilots ARE still hired by pilots (even if they are management pilots). And most mainline pilots suffer from the myopic belief that a well-compensated regional pilot group is not a good thing. Just about ALL mainline pilots want lower pay at regionals, not higher, and view regional bottom-feeder pilots as just working the system to reach the exalted mainline the fastest--they were the "smart ones."

As far as you saying it's our problem to fix, and not yours, I take great exception to this. The mainline pilot groups CREATED the second-tier regional system, the ultimate B-scale, and they perpetuate it through ALPA National's policies. This is undeniable.

Also saying that someone who doesn't have their applications in (at a "real airline" is what you're implying) is part of the problem, is rather insulting to those pilots who have fought to create a decent career (and a decent airline) out of a bad situation, who are now victims of a malicious mainline management and an apathetic ALPA National response (which is mostly influenced by mainline MEC's).
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom