100LL... Again!
youwantapieceofme??
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2002
- Posts
- 1,533
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TonyC said:Seeing the photos of the airplane hours and days after the incident, one would have never guessed just how incredibly difficult was the task of bringing this airplane safely back to earth. This was truly a feat of remarkable airmanship.
Essentially, this crew was faced with the same predicament as Capt Al Haynes and his crew on the DC-10 that lost the center engine and all hydraulic controls and managed to bring the crippled airplane to Sioux City, Iowa and spare the lives of many passengers.
Two distinct differences, though, strike me immediately. One, Capt Haynes at least had a symmetrical airplane, both in drag and thrust. The DHL crew, by contrast, had a damaged wing and a raging fire, complicated by leaking fuel that threatened the supply of fuel to the engine. This crew desperately needed to get the airplane on the ground before the fuel supply was exhausted or the fire damaged the wing further. The urgency contradicted the desire to spend time getting to know the flight characteristics of this "new" airplane configuration. The opportunity for "flight test" was very limited.
Secondly, there were no passengers involved. This fact had absolutely no bearing on the outcome of the flight, but it had a profound impact on the amount of publicity it received. Please don't get me wrong; I in no way mean to imply a body count was needed to capture the attention of the media. I think if there had been 170 souls on board, and all 170 safely returned to earth, these airmen would have been immediately raised to the level of cultural heroes. As one who is hesitant to confer that title on anyone, it doesn't bother me that these guys weren't called heroes. I don't think they did anything heroic - - they just did their job, however incredibly well. By the same token, so did Capt Haynes.
The crew is to be applauded for their fine exhibit of superior airmanship, even if they are just lowly cargo pilots. Maybe now they'll be able to get jobs with real airlines, huh?
Oh, and another note: I read somewhere that the crew (or one or two of them, maybe?) had recently heard Capt Haynes speak and were familiar with the process that his crew had used to learn to fly the crippled DC-10 and to bring it in to land. As I understand it, this knowledge was extremely useful when they found themselves also without benefit of flight controls. Kudos to Capt Haynes for sharing his experience!
I know nothing of A300 B4 (or after) systems. Would a RAT be of any good with no hydraulic fluid in the system?b747dogg said:It has been about 8 years and 4 airlines since I flew the A300 B4, but what about the "RAT"?