gearupflapsup
I don't want one!
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2002
- Posts
- 43
PCL 128's post is not quite correct.
Yes, PCL's characterization is EXACTLY correct and you should refrain from wild speculation. The decision , which I am looking at indicates a violation of 1.F and directs the company to comply with same.
System Board members (3) must put a final signature , then the decision will be published. Since a single executed copy has to exist the document is circulating from the Arbitrator who has signed it, to the ALPA Board Member (Who signed it ) to the Company guy, who will sign it in dissent.
This is important stuff. A lot of pilots quality of life depends upon it. If you don't know, don't embellish.
Good job PCL 128.
Last edited: