dondk
Don't you wish
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 887
here is the lowdown on the test...
during my brief stint I was given the opportunity to revamp the process. The old process sucked and was basically unfair. We had made up questions on the written test, the interview questions were geared for guy flying jets for the last 5 years and honestly most of the touchy feely questions were all negative. We also bounced out a lot of good pilots on a bad written test.
Also, some of the program schools had the test, so everyone passed and everyone got the same questions wrong (bad gouge). It was scary to say the least of the people that got by because of it. We changed up the format of the questions for the JET U types and their management complained because they "trained their students on the old format"
the "new" process was designed with the current audience in mind. That is the 800-3000 pilot, CFI, 135, 91 and some 121 guys. Pilots who had little to no jet time and in some cases barely 100 ME time and more than likely no hard IMC time.
that is the reality of the market for potential candidates.. SO... now they have upped the ante to seek the "preferred" group of candidates. this group is former Eagle and Comair FO's that have been sitting in the right seat for years and looking for the quick upgrade.
Pinnacle does a good job of weeding out some candidates, but has taken it too far again. They want well qualified people, but are not willing to pay for it. That is why classes go 1/2 filled and they have to call 400 people to get 30 to interview.
The test has a lot of RNAV stuff on it these days, but the core of the test is right out of the ATP, CPL and IRA written tests.
during my brief stint I was given the opportunity to revamp the process. The old process sucked and was basically unfair. We had made up questions on the written test, the interview questions were geared for guy flying jets for the last 5 years and honestly most of the touchy feely questions were all negative. We also bounced out a lot of good pilots on a bad written test.
Also, some of the program schools had the test, so everyone passed and everyone got the same questions wrong (bad gouge). It was scary to say the least of the people that got by because of it. We changed up the format of the questions for the JET U types and their management complained because they "trained their students on the old format"
the "new" process was designed with the current audience in mind. That is the 800-3000 pilot, CFI, 135, 91 and some 121 guys. Pilots who had little to no jet time and in some cases barely 100 ME time and more than likely no hard IMC time.
that is the reality of the market for potential candidates.. SO... now they have upped the ante to seek the "preferred" group of candidates. this group is former Eagle and Comair FO's that have been sitting in the right seat for years and looking for the quick upgrade.
Pinnacle does a good job of weeding out some candidates, but has taken it too far again. They want well qualified people, but are not willing to pay for it. That is why classes go 1/2 filled and they have to call 400 people to get 30 to interview.
The test has a lot of RNAV stuff on it these days, but the core of the test is right out of the ATP, CPL and IRA written tests.