Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once more, P-F-T is an employment-employer-employee issue. If the employer requires the employee to pay for his training as a condition of employment, then a P-F-T situation exists. If employers require applicants to have type ratings along with minimum hours and other experience before they can be considered for employment, then it is not P-F-T.pilotyip said:Following your posted definition of PFT. Definition of PFT: Is a former Value Jet pilot who paid 10K for his job in 1996 a PFTer, because he got a DC-9 rating? How about the Net Jets pilot who paid 10K for a CE 500 rating in 1996? Or the ACA BEA-41 who paid 10K for an F/O 121 letter? Which of these well qualified pilots is a PFTer by your definition?
Having instructed Alitalia students at FSI, being around other foreign airline students at the same school, being associated briefly with the JAL school in Napa, California, visiting at the ANA school in Bakersfield, having a friend work there for a few years, having been interviewed at the Lufthansa school in Phoenix and having friends who worked there, you have it all wrong. It is a situation of the airlines P-F-Ting.blade230 said:I hate to inform you of this de727ups, but this is a VERY COMMON practice in Europe. It has also been very common in the US. (early 90's PFT)
There are all kinds of deals like that. Some outfit in Las Vegas advertised for FOs, and required them as a condition of employment to earn their types at its approved vendor. That is P-F-T.pilotyip said:Valuejet required you to give them 10K to get the job, but you got a DC-9 type out of the training at FSI, was that PFT? Looking at your definition of you paid, but got soemthing that was an approaved rating.
Any reasonable person would take your statement to mean that European airlines are P-F-T, which is why I responded the way I did. I have no reason to believe that there would not be P-F-T or time-selling schemes outside the U.S.I hate to inform you of this de727ups, but this is a VERY COMMON practice in Europe. It has also been very common in the US. (early 90's PFT)
No, my friend, you are the one who is angry. Your post tells all . . . .The_Russian said:1. Bobby cant say anything because its not even his industry! He is not and never will be an airline pilot.
2. 350 and 727 are lonely angry people who have nothing better to do (along with their friend Bobby) but talk trash about things they have no first hand experience with . . . .
Just because you post 5 million times on FlightInfo, or you can push the autopilot "ON" in a 727, or you hate yourself so much and you are so bored with your life, OR YOU LIKE BASHING YOUR FELLOW PILOTS FOR NO F***ING REASON!!!...... *breath*.............does not justify your opinion well enough to make it a fact. You are all wrong and you are angry . . .
This is one of the more fact-laden posts I've seen. At least when I criticize Gulfstream, I document from its website.You are already there with your cup of coffee and calculator trying to figure out another reason why YOU FEW CRY BABYS hate Gulfstream and the other schools like them. Never once have you brought FACT to the debate (or argument) table . . . .
Did Tommy cut in line ahead of you, Russian? If he got in line ahead of you faster when teacher told you kids to get in line, that would be different. Was there already a line and did Tommy cut in front of the others? My first-grade teacher would have made Tommy go to the back of the line. So much for that analogy.It reminds me of First grade....... "teacher....Tommy got in line at the finger paint station because he was faster than me and I didnt get the color red! WHAAA WHAAA"
I never said that - you did - and I thank you for the compliment. As for being a guru, just call me Mahareshi Mahesh Yogi.The grass is always greener on Bobby's side though, because he knows exactly what he is talking about. Who named you guys the gurus anyway?
By the tone and tenor of your comments, especially at the outset of them, it was you, sir.Remember who made this personal . . . .
Reread comment above about making things personal. Also see this gem from a few months ago:Oh yes you remember moderating me out before. It was a big stink because I made a good point and Baby Bobby didnt like it so you "erased" me. But thats ok.
You know what they say, if you can't attack the poster's argument, attack the poster.Originally posted by The_Russian
Bobby, you stink.
Indeed, politics makes for strange bedfellows.de727ups said:Both doing our best to steer folks away from Gulfstream....me with my opinion on PFT and him with his demeanor. What a great team we make.
Yes. And . . . .pilotyip said:f I went to work for Exec Jet and already had a CE-550 type rating and paid 10K for my Citation Jet training, I would be guilty of PFT (no additional market value of type rating rule) and would be banned to the GIA end of the bar. It that what you said?
On that issue, that's really the point. Of course, a degree has nothing intrinsically to do with flying an airplane. The benefits of an education notwithstanding, when it is clear that pilots with degrees are wanted over those without and you have such a degree, then you have one more advantage going for you besides your ratings and time.College degree had nothing to do with flying an airplane, it just opens doors.