On Your Six
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Posts
- 4,507
Seems like a lot of people are talking about peer-level wages - especially with regard to Delta and other troubled legacy carriers. I am NOT a part of the Delta "family," so I am looking from the outside. I am tired of listening to the bratty Comair/ASA pilots trying to push their views of massive paycuts in order to save their own a$$es. So, I have some questions:
Why shouldn't Comair and ASA pilots be paid what their peers at MESA are paid? Seems like everyone is attempting to make apples-to-apples comparisons here...
So, let's have Comair and ASA pilots agree to MESA levels while the mainline guys accept 30%+ cuts (to AA or UAL levels for comparable equipment)... That's only fair, right?
Why not MESA levels? You're leaving a lot of money on the table by not flying for MESA levels... Shouldn't Comair and MESA CRJ Captains be paid the same for the same equipment and same number of hours, etc.?
HELP ME UNDERSTAND why Comair pilots should be paid more than their counterparts flying the same equipment elsewhere... It's the same argument isn't it?
Why shouldn't Comair and ASA pilots be paid what their peers at MESA are paid? Seems like everyone is attempting to make apples-to-apples comparisons here...
So, let's have Comair and ASA pilots agree to MESA levels while the mainline guys accept 30%+ cuts (to AA or UAL levels for comparable equipment)... That's only fair, right?
Why not MESA levels? You're leaving a lot of money on the table by not flying for MESA levels... Shouldn't Comair and MESA CRJ Captains be paid the same for the same equipment and same number of hours, etc.?
HELP ME UNDERSTAND why Comair pilots should be paid more than their counterparts flying the same equipment elsewhere... It's the same argument isn't it?