A Squared
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 3,006
No, of course that is not a direct quote of what you said, sorry if that confused you. It's a paraphrasing of your comment, to illustrate the silliness of making a statement about a nationwide percentage (be it 1%, 15%, 50%, of air traffic, vehicle occupancy, or agricultural land utilization, whatever) based on a anecdotal experience limited to one location at one specific time.SkyBoy1981 said:Is this what I said? I mean, you just quoted me at the top of your post, and now you're inserting another quote that says something completely different than the statement that I had made.
Right. More of the same. exactly how do you calculate "more than 1%" (direct quote) ?? Show your work...................Of course you can't, and this is my point. You say you "know" (direct quote) it's more than 1%, because you "saw lots and lots of corporate planes" (that is not supposed to be a direct quote, but it's the essence of what you're saying) which is a completely non-quantitative experience. Really, you have no idea what the percentage is.SkyBoy1981 said:I've seen the volume of corporate airplanes in places like TEB, VNY, PBI, and other airports around the country enough to know that they use more than 1% of our system.
Now if you say; " well, I looked on flghtaware, and XXXX airplanes were in the air and XX were corporate aircraft" (speculative hypothetical statement, not a direct quote) , then at least you'd have a rational basis for claiming a percentage, we might discuss what time you looked, and how you determined which were corporate vs. bugsmashers, and some other details, but at least data from Flight aware would is a legitimate basis for claiming some percentage. "I saw lots of corporate jets once" (not a direct quote) is not