Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pay up Corporate....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
SkyBoy1981 said:
Is this what I said? I mean, you just quoted me at the top of your post, and now you're inserting another quote that says something completely different than the statement that I had made.
No, of course that is not a direct quote of what you said, sorry if that confused you. It's a paraphrasing of your comment, to illustrate the silliness of making a statement about a nationwide percentage (be it 1%, 15%, 50%, of air traffic, vehicle occupancy, or agricultural land utilization, whatever) based on a anecdotal experience limited to one location at one specific time.


SkyBoy1981 said:
I've seen the volume of corporate airplanes in places like TEB, VNY, PBI, and other airports around the country enough to know that they use more than 1% of our system.
Right. More of the same. exactly how do you calculate "more than 1%" (direct quote) ?? Show your work...................Of course you can't, and this is my point. You say you "know" (direct quote) it's more than 1%, because you "saw lots and lots of corporate planes" (that is not supposed to be a direct quote, but it's the essence of what you're saying) which is a completely non-quantitative experience. Really, you have no idea what the percentage is.

Now if you say; " well, I looked on flghtaware, and XXXX airplanes were in the air and XX were corporate aircraft" (speculative hypothetical statement, not a direct quote) , then at least you'd have a rational basis for claiming a percentage, we might discuss what time you looked, and how you determined which were corporate vs. bugsmashers, and some other details, but at least data from Flight aware would is a legitimate basis for claiming some percentage. "I saw lots of corporate jets once" (not a direct quote) is not
 
Our government and business management, working together, has managed to make a shambles of what was once the greatest airline system in the entire world.

I don't suppose anyone in either group will be satisfied until they have destroyed corporate aviation as well.
 
A Squared said:
No, of course that is not a direct quote of what you said, sorry if that confused you. It's a paraphrasing of your comment, to illustrate the silliness of making a statement about a nationwide percentage (be it 1%, 15%, 50%, of air traffic, vehicle occupancy, or agricultural land utilization, whatever) based on a anecdotal experience limited to one location at one specific time.

You're right, perhaps it was not the best comparison. I still believe that anyone who uses our NAS on a daily basis will agree that corporate aviation easily makes up more than 1%. It doesn't take a statistics major to figure that out.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom