Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Overpowered aircraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter 9GClub
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 33

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
CRJ-700. Repositioning flight with 6000 pounds fuel. On takeoff, accidently select APR thrust on both engines.

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: HOLD ON!!!
I had a repo flight in the CRJ-700 too and it was quite a kick. We didn't go into APR thrust but on the roll it pushed us back in our seats. Pretty cool for a CRJ. I'd have to say the SR-71 is best. Put those engines on a CRJ and then you'd have a pretty nice airplane.
 
Flightjock30 said:
Fokker 100s used to have the 2nd highest thrust to weight ratio after the 757. Not sure now with a lot of newer Airbuses (new A330 and A340s) and Boeings (767-400, 777) out though.

Wrong. Jumpseating on the F-100 flightdeck more times than I care to remember I can state first hand that the F-100 has no where near the 2nd highest thrust to weight ratio.

Where do people come up with this stuff? The MD-80 blows the doors off the F-100 and that isn't saying very much.

Best Thrust to Weight Ratio Aircraft. Lear 60. Hands down.
 
Cessna 120, no electrics, O235 ... :D


Bergenhiemer
 
cands said:
lear 23, 24 +6000ft/min on t/o

The Lear 60 has a total of 9,200 lbs of thrust.
The max takeoff weight is 23,500 lbs.

I dont know how the Lear 23 and 24 compares but I am sure it is pretty close.

FWIW, we get 6000 ft per min on t/o all the time. The best I have ever seen is 15,000 ft per min on a cold night when we were light.
 
Where go the G5s fit in this? All I know is that I have seen them doing 2500 ft/min thru FL400 outta SAV with a flight plan to the west coast.
 
Lead Sled said:
Note to 9GClub: There ain't no such thing as an over powered aircraft.

'Sled

Sure there is...anything with enough ba!!s to have an afterburner!
 
DX Rick said:
How would you know how many G's you were pulling, if any, at the time? Do you have a big watch?

You betcha I do. Don't you? Mine's bigger than yours.

2 G's in a B752 is the same as 2 G's in a C150, and having executed more than a few steep turns (here we go again) in the latter, I am edumacatedly inferentially deductibly deducing that the linear acceleration value did not in fact reach 2.0.
I would say that I'm fallible and thus possibly incorrect, but what self-respecting pilot says that?

Anybody else wanna contest (or validate) the 1+ G thing? Any 757 drivers with big watches maybe?
 
Dangerkitty said:
The Lear 60 has a total of 9,200 lbs of thrust.

I dont know how the Lear 23 and 24 compares but I am sure it is pretty close.

The noise-to-thrust ratio of the 20-series lears is much greater than that of the 60 (the Harley-Davidson factor, if you will).
 
The old Convair 880's and 990's were rockets from what I've heard from old airline pilots. Handled like sports cars too
 
Hiya all,

Half full DC-9-10. It will max out the autopilot...

What a ride...no school like the old school...

Nu
 
All these stories of "overpowered aircraft" with fantastic climb rates with low takeoff weights is nice, but what I would like to know is which Commercial Airliner has the highest thrust to weight ratio at MGTOW (Structural).

On a side note, the 74 Classic (GE powered) when light is pretty impressive. When you consider how much of a useful load range you have you might get an understanding how much excess thrust that is at light weights. When light at a max pitch angle of 17.5 degrees it will accelerate straight through normal departure profiles. That's with max reduced thrust for takeoff; I could not even venture a guess of what it would be like at max rated thrust!
 
EagleRJ said:
CRJ-700. Repositioning flight with 6000 pounds fuel. On takeoff, accidently select APR thrust on both engines.

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: HOLD ON!!!

Accidently....Right.....:)
 
FRJ
12,100#T/ 34524#W (heavy a/c gross, if memory serves me)=.35 ratio

Not to shabby, but throw on a straight, high aspect ratio wing and hold on.

I once saw 780 feet to FL310 (ceiling) in 17 minutes in a nearly full airplane flying the standard profile. I miss that airplane.
 
Imho :-)

FearlessFreep said:
On a side note, the 74 Classic (GE powered) when light is pretty impressive.

I prefer the Pratt & Whitneys Qs. . . specifically, the JT9D-7Q :) And the lighter, the better. Can you say "Git up n go!"

Once upon a time, I was in Lear 35 that did 300 feet to FL 410 in around 11 minutes . . . cannot remember our takeoff weight, but a hop and skip we were airborne.

'Props :D
 
What about those DC-8s with the big fans that UPS operates?

Anyone got the numbers on those?
 
I know it's not a commercial airliner but the GIISP with a max take off weight of 62,000#s and 22,800#s thrust. Not to mention it will blow out all the windows within about six blocks with those low bypass RR's.
 
The Lancair Propjet/Sentry will do 7,000 fpm "solo".

750 hp, 2200 lbs empty.

Not exactly in the airliner/corporate jet category, but it's still pretty sweet.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top