That not so self made man has paid infinitely more than his " fair share" in taxes. Why should he pay 50% in total taxes and his employees pay closer to 10%?
This is just more of that Compound Empowerment stuff that is making the rounds on place like Alternet and the Huffington Post. A person in another thread tried to pass it off as a model for the progressive tax system.
Problem is, and something Cynic has yet to explain, is why it doesn't work both ways. If it did a person on Food Stamps for example, should pay higher taxes because they benefit more from the government infrastucture that is in place to distribute food stamps. The rich and middle class pay all the taxes right now to support food stamp programs, yet receive no benefit. Isn't it time fthe ood stamp recipients pay their fair share?
Like most things on Alternet its just more Progressive idiocy that hasn't really been thought through. The progressive tax system as proposed by people like Adam Smith works with simple algebra y=mx+b. This way no one could make a case for food stamp recipients paying their "fair share", or trying to quantify what "fair share" means.
The comment above is so true - there are so many people paying $0 that it is a joke to say that the rest of us owe them something. You cant get back on your feet until you get off your a$$
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.