Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Only have a Private & Hate College

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
smellthejeta said:
A few thoughts...

To the guy who said that making $45k right out of school was good money, $45k might be good money for a college graduate, but it ain't sh!t in a metro area with a high COL. Trust me. I know.
yes, i understand where you're coming from, saying that cost of living is high in certain areas. but think about this for a second: my roommate will graduate 2 days after he turns 22, he's single, and has no experience in the field he's going into. they're willing to pay him $45,000/year, starting off. think of the advancement possiblities. they're not going to rope him in with a high offer, then leave him at $45K for the next 10 years. he'll be making some serious money. that's the point i'm trying to make. i don't think that this particular company would take that risk with someone only holding a G.E.D. or a high school diploma. he's a 3.8 student who is very active at our university.
 
Interesting stuff....

Anywho, how is $45,000 a year for 10 years a lot of money?

EDIT: In comparison to what a doctor or lawyer would make 10 years after their 4th year of college.....
 
Metro752 said:
Interesting stuff....

Anywho, how is $45,000 a year for 10 years a lot of money?

EDIT: In comparison to what a doctor or lawyer would make 10 years after their 4th year of college.....
ok, not to be mean, but kid, go back and read my post. nowhere in there did i say that $45,000 for 10 years was good. what did i say? go back and read it. if you're too lazy, i'll put it in bold, word for word for ya:

they're willing to pay him $45,000/year, starting off. think of the advancement possiblities. they're not going to rope him in with a high offer, then leave him at $45K for the next 10 years.

now think about it really quick. i'll wait...

ok. after reading that again, what do you think i meant? if i was you, i'd put a lot of emphasis on the last sentence in bold up there. what that last sentence means is that they are not going to make him a very nice offer right off the bat, then let him sit there and rot for the next 10 years, only letting him make $45,000. that is unethical. instead, what that tells you is that my roommate will be making good money b/c they are willing to pay him so much off the bat. he will get regular raises and 10 years down the road, he will be doing very good for himself.

now, again, i reiterate: where did i say that making $45,000 for the next 10 years is good money? seems to me that i did not. READ, metro, before you respond, ok? read and interpret what people are saying before responding. makes me think that harry potter books are right up your alley...
 
cforst513 said:
yes, i understand where you're coming from, saying that cost of living is high in certain areas. but think about this for a second: my roommate will graduate 2 days after he turns 22, he's single, and has no experience in the field he's going into. they're willing to pay him $45,000/year, starting off. think of the advancement possiblities. they're not going to rope him in with a high offer, then leave him at $45K for the next 10 years. he'll be making some serious money. that's the point i'm trying to make. i don't think that this particular company would take that risk with someone only holding a G.E.D. or a high school diploma. he's a 3.8 student who is very active at our university.

With age comes wisdom (hopefully). My mother takes a lot of things on blind faith. I don't. Take a look at flying for a career. Everybody puts up with sh!tty pay at regionals all in the name of 121 TJ PIC time so they can get a good paying job at the majors. What a lot of them fail to realize is that those coveted "majors" jobs may not be there. I'm looking at a 6 figure a year job when I'm 30, which may not be there due to medical reasons. If it was guaranteed, I'd be taking out tons of loans, having lots of fun, and working a lot less.

Have they promised your friend advancement? Have they guaranteed him pay raises greater than 3% or whatever the cost of inflation usually is? If they have, I hope it's in writing. If it's not, there's a reason. If there's no guarantee at all, there's also a reason.

I looked at going to school for pharmacy. A family friend who is a pharmacist advised against it. I told him, "Hey dude... look at the dough they pay out of school." He told me "Hey dude... there's not much advancement opportunity in pharmacy, so don't expect drastic pay increases every year." He said I would pretty much be limited to COLA adjustments every year.

Also, why wouldn't they take the risk at roping him in at $45k a year and leaving him at that? If he leaves, they hire another graduate from school at $45k per year. You want to tell me that is not feasible? The airlines do it all the time. If you don't like it, quit, because somebody else will do your job for the same money or less.

I still submit that $45k ain't sh!t, at least depending on your cost of living. I make about that as a line guy. Let's look at what $45k gets you in Los Angeles (and figures are close to what I was at in another major city as well).

There are 26 pay periods in a year. My after tax income is approximately 71% of my gross pay, and I haven't started a 401k yet. $45,000*.71/26 = $1228 per pay period.

Rent (includes util but not cable/phone, and I live in the cheapest building I could find without rat infestation) $825. Car payment (I don't drive anything fancy): $225. Insurance(liability only): $50. Student loan payment (the one I have to make): $80. DSL/Phone/Cell: $800. Cable: $45. Gas: $150. Food: $175 (I don't eat out that much). Grand total $1630. This isn't including about $400 in student loan payments that I can defer while I'm in school, and that a new car would cost me more per month, my insurance rates would be significantly higher, and credit cards that I might have. Also, this figure 1) doesn't include 401(k) investments and 2) savings for the 3 to 6 months of "immediately available" funds you should have for emergencies. If that was the case, for the $400/mo that you have left over after all normal bills are paid, you'd have to save for 15 months for three months of expenses and 30 months for six months of expenses (assuming monthly expenses of $2000).

Now, my brother's making $56k out of school, no experience, and only a four year degreel, and lives in an area where the cost of living is much lower than it is here. *That* is decent money.

So, in summary... $45k/yr is what everybody out of school should be making to pay their bills. It's good money for a college graduate, but sh!tty pay overall. I'm thinking about things that you want me to think about, and unless they've charted him a clear career progression, I'm not convinced that he will be guaranteed to make stellar cash with his present employer.

And kid, you seem to be saying that because they are starting your friend off at a "high" starting salary, that and that alone means he will get substantial pay raises every year. Unless he works under a collective baragaining agreement, I would be very leery of any promises. Regarding your comment about letting him sit at $45k/yr being unethical... What are you smoking? *Nothing* requires them to give him *any* pay raise every year. Look at the airlines... They're CUTTING employees' pay. Is that ethical? Why not?
 
Last edited:
College?! Screw that. Spend your $$$ on a new truck or something

Besides, as a private pilot and college graduate, I can do without the extra competition.
 
TonyC said:
I see an obvious area for cost-cutting. 800 bucks for phones is insane.

Geeze, I really did write that. I meant to say $80. Covers DSL, land line with unlimited local and an hour of long distance, and the cheapest nationwide cell plan cingular has to offer.
 
smellthejeta said:
Have they promised your friend advancement? Have they guaranteed him pay raises greater than 3% or whatever the cost of inflation usually is? If they have, I hope it's in writing. If it's not, there's a reason. If there's no guarantee at all, there's also a reason.

A very good point that I'm glad you brought up. I graduated in 2001 w/ an engineering degree and accepted an engineering job for $48k/yr in an average cost (not high, not low) of living area. I thought that was great money at the time, but I quickly learned it wasn't. Like was said before, it's enough to pay bills and save a little if you're frugal. But if you've got debt from college, car payment, insurance, paying for flying, etc. it quickly becomes not enough.

If you think a systems analyst pay or any other tech job starts at a salary like that and increases by 10-15% /yr, you're in for a surprise. Figure more on 3-4%, maybe 6% if you get a bang up review that year. It is really difficult to break $100k/yr in a job like that, but can be done if you put in a lot of years, have excellent (i.e. indisposable) experience, and work for the right company.

It's funny how many pilots think the non-aviation world is full of jobs where people are rolling around in bathtubs full of money. Not sure where that mindset comes from, but most college educated people make around $50-60k/yr and work over 40 hrs/wk. I'm talking about people that've been out of college and working for awhile too...
 
wrxpilot said:
It's funny how many pilots think the non-aviation world is full of jobs where people are rolling around in bathtubs full of money. Not sure where that mindset comes from, but most college educated people make around $50-60k/yr and work over 40 hrs/wk. I'm talking about people that've been out of college and working for awhile too...

My point exactly! My dad is a senior staff member at a university and holds a Masters degree in accounting and a CPA. He makes around $70K, and he's about to retire.

Anyway, just out of curiosity, how is 2nd year regional FO pay?

-Goose
 
Goose Egg said:
My point exactly! My dad is a senior staff member at a university and holds a Masters degree in accounting and a CPA. He makes around $70K, and he's about to retire.

Anyway, just out of curiosity, how is 2nd year regional FO pay?

-Goose

Around $33 a block hour, give or take. Back in the UAX days, ACA paid 2nd year RJ FO's about $10/block hour more than 1st year. That translates into a $10k/yr raise.
 
Hiring in one's image

pilotyip said:
It is said that those who hire, hire in their own image


What does that mean?
It means what it says. It means that those who hire, hire those who are like them.

I shouldn't have to provide this example, Yip, but I feel compelled. For years, the pilot workgroups at the majors were comprised primarily of former military pilots. Individuals from the workgroups would be picked for pilot interview boards. Which meant if a former military pilot appeared before an interview board, the board likely saw him/her as a peer because he/she was in the image - part of the "club." Compare with a civilian-only pilot, who, while completely qualified and competent, and, perhaps, with a degree, was not seen that way because he/she came from a different background. Thank goodness, the airlines are hiring more and more civilian pilots.
Exactly we do hire in our own image. We know a college degree or lack of college degree does not define a man as a person. At USA Jet like all other opened minded airlines i.e. AirTran, Spirit, JB, SWA and all the regionals do not define the presence of a piece of paper as the ultimate definition of a successful candidate. Great airlines look at the whole man concept, what does this person bring to our company.
Who do you mean by "we," kemosabe? You speak only for your company. In other words, only AirTran, Spirit, JB, SWA and all the regionals are the only great airlines??

Based on my experiences, I, for one, would argue that the regionals are not in the least bit opened-minded. Moreover, your comment that the above-named companies are the only "great" airlines is a slam against the all the others! Which, I'm sure, their pilots won't be appreciate.
There are pilots with degrees that fill that concept as well as pilots without college degrees. A great personality, a solid record of achievement, not necessarily defined by college, and a convincing desire to bring skills to our company are what will sell us on hiring a person. It is not a HR decision, they are involved in the recommendation process, but an operations board makes the decision.
Each company has its own culture and will establish its own hiring criteria. Yours, at USA Jets, is only one example. To superimpose your company's criteria on overall aviation hiring is misleading, and confusing.
ERAUBrat3 said:
I think our points fall on deaf ears . . . .
I knooow.
qmaster3 said:
It's those "deaf ears" that hire.
You don't know the half of it.
 
Bobby what are you saying?

Where did you read I was imposing our hiring standards on anyone. We are talking about the possession of 4-yr degree or not. Great airlines look at the whole man concept and not the piece of paper. That is open mindedness on those airlines listed, it was not intented to be an all inclusive list. Kit says 172 out of 177 hiring do not make a 4-yr degree a hard requirement. We are talking about the possession of 4-yr degree or not. Sounds like a few readers are starting to get the picture, hang in there Bobby.
 
Last edited:
pilotyip said:
Kit says 172 out of 177 hiring do not make a 4-yr degree a hard requirement.

But wouldn't the real question be how many that get hired at the respective airlines have the degree vs. how many that do not? I'd like to see a percentage, some real numbers here. I mean, it's one thing to pontificate from "on high" as it were about how unecessary a degree is for a piloting job, but it's quite another to be on the other side, a prospective employee, and trying to construct the best possible scenario for one's self to get hired. Sure, it is possible to find a good flying job without a degree. But is it likely? Is it realistic? Is it more likely that I will find a good job without a degree, or less? Which path gives me the best chance to make a living by flying an airplane? (Which is all I really care about anyway.)

Those are the real questions.

-Goose
 
Last edited:
wrxpilot said:
It's funny how many pilots think the non-aviation world is full of jobs where people are rolling around in bathtubs full of money. Not sure where that mindset comes from, but most college educated people make around $50-60k/yr and work over 40 hrs/wk. I'm talking about people that've been out of college and working for awhile too...

very true... I've heard on this board a lot of "there's no big money in aviation" which is true these days. However, 6 figure jobs in any industry require a lot of "paying dues" and working your way up.
 
Metro752 said:
Interesting stuff....

Anywho, how is $45,000 a year for 10 years a lot of money?

EDIT: In comparison to what a doctor or lawyer would make 10 years after their 4th year of college.....

there are doctors and lawyers who do very well for themselves. But there are also doctors leaving the profession because they can't afford insurance anymore, and good lawyers who haven't made more than $70k in a given year.

big $$$ jobs are not a slam dunk in ANY field, industry or profession. they require experience, commitment, and education.
 
smellthejeta said:
Have they promised your friend advancement? Have they guaranteed him pay raises greater than 3% or whatever the cost of inflation usually is? If they have, I hope it's in writing. If it's not, there's a reason. If there's no guarantee at all, there's also a reason.

not sure where you work, but employers don't guarantee anyone anything. Your advancement is based on your performance.

smellthejeta said:
Also, why wouldn't they take the risk at roping him in at $45k a year and leaving him at that? If he leaves, they hire another graduate from school at $45k per year. You want to tell me that is not feasible? The airlines do it all the time. If you don't like it, quit, because somebody else will do your job for the same money or less.

ok, but in many fields your value as an employee is commensurate with your experience. when you get into management and leadership ranks you're not making widgets, and companies are willing to pay big bucks for experience.
 
Goose Egg said:
But wouldn't the real question be how many that get hired at the respective airlines have the degree vs. how many that do not? I'd like to see a percentage, some real numbers here. I mean, it's one thing to pontificate from "on high" as it were about how unecessary a degree is for a piloting job, but it's quite another to be on the other side, a prospective employee, and trying to construct the best possible scenario for one's self to get hired. Sure, it is possible to find a good flying job without a degree. But is it likely? Is it realistic? Is it more likely that I will find a good job without a degree, or less? Which path gives me the best chance to make a living by flying an airplane? (Which is all I really care about anyway.)

Those are the real questions.

-Goose

let's also not lose sight of the fact that college is education and imparts knowledge. regardless of an employer's requirements, one can never go wrong with furthering their education.

To advise otherwise is irresponsible.
 
"Great" airlines and open-mindedness

pilotyip said:
Where did you read I was imposing our hiring standards on anyone.
You are qualified to speak for your company only, Yip, USA Jets, and not the industry as a whole. But, that's what you're trying to do. Let reps from SWA, JB, etc. and the other "great airlines" log in and speak up.
Great airlines look at the whole man concept and not the piece of paper. That is open mindedness on those airlines listed, it was not intented to be an all inclusive list.
Based on my experiences, only, I would heartily argue that they are not as open-minded as you might believe. Go read my posts on that subject. And,all the others are not so great? That is a subjective opinion on your part, Yip, not objective. Meaning, Delta, Continental, American, United, AWA, U, Midwest Express, etc., are not so great, simply because their hiring criteria are not congruent with yours?
Kit says 172 out of 177 hiring do not make a 4-yr degree a hard requirement. We are talking about the possession of 4-yr degree or not. Sounds like a few readers are starting to get the picture, hang in there Bobby.
Of course, Kit's history of purveying sophistries is well-known.

Just read the rebuttals on this thread alone to your position. Some people do "get it," from the standpoint that starting the career without the best credentials, as you advocate, is sooooo ill-advised.
 
Last edited:
Money bathtubs

wrxpilot said:
It's funny how many pilots think the non-aviation world is full of jobs where people are rolling around in bathtubs full of money. Not sure where that mindset comes from, but most college educated people make around $50-60k/yr and work over 40 hrs/wk. I'm talking about people that've been out of college and working for awhile too...
Or make less than $50-$60K for the same hours.
 
Hey Bobby: Where is the list of airlines requiring a 4-yr degree? AA, UAL, CAL, DAL do not count because they are not even interviewing and are most likely years away from hiring. And again you have never answered “Why if the 4-yr degree is way to ensure you will get hired, how come non-4-yr degree guys are hired in front of the degreed pilots?
 
Why if the 4-yr degree is way to ensure you will get hired, how come non-4-yr degree guys are hired in front of the degreed pilots?

Because some people have stronger interview skills than others, regardless of whether or not they have a degree. You constantly miss the point, yip. Proof enough that, at least in your case, some more schooling couldn't hurt.
 
mayday1 said:
let's also not lose sight of the fact that college is education and imparts knowledge. regardless of an employer's requirements, one can never go wrong with furthering their education.

When all the BS is cleared up as to which airlines give a crap about what...this is my true point. You can never be mistaken in getting a 4 year degree.
 
mayday1 said:
not sure where you work, but employers don't guarantee anyone anything. Your advancement is based on your performance.

I know that, with one exception -- a collective bargaining agreement (and even then it's not guaranteed -- look what's happening to the airlines). I'm not sure if you were paying attention to the context of my post, but I was responding to a guy that thinks 45k out of school is great money and that his rommate is destined to killer pay raises only because he has a decent starting salary for a college graduate. I as trying to tell him that nobody is guaranteed anything, and whatever they told him in an interview / job offer should be taken with a grain of salt unless there is something substantive to back it up.

ok, but in many fields your value as an employee is commensurate with your experience. when you get into management and leadership ranks you're not making widgets, and companies are willing to pay big bucks for experience.

We're not talking about management, we're talking about a kid who just graduated from college. Yeah, I'm well aware that experience usually dictates that you get a higher salary/pay rate than somebody with less experience. However, length of service within a company is no guarantee of substantial payraises. Your experience is best for negotiating starting pay at a new job, and less so for trying to get more money out of your current employer. The kid was talking as if his roommate would be seeing pay raises of greater than 10% (what I would consider stellar) every year he worked for them (3%-6% depending on review seems to be standard).
 
mayday1 said:
very true... I've heard on this board a lot of "there's no big money in aviation" which is true these days. However, 6 figure jobs in any industry require a lot of "paying dues" and working your way up.

I can name a six figure a year job in aviation that you can get with a 2 year degree and make the big bucks within 5 years of graduation.
 
ERAUBrat3 said:
When all the BS is cleared up as to which airlines give a crap about what...this is my true point. You can never be mistaken in getting a 4 year degree.

I sincerely believe that if somebody won't put in the effort in school to achieve above average grades (3.0+) that he may actually be wasting his time and money. I submit myself as an example -- in the field in which I did my undergraduate studies, because of my subpar GPA, it is very difficult to find a job in my field.
 
pilotyip said:
And again you have never answered “Why if the 4-yr degree is way to ensure you will get hired, how come non-4-yr degree guys are hired in front of the degreed pilots?
You are putting words in my mouth. I never said the degree ensures a job. Nothing will ensure a job. But the degree will certainly improve your chances of getting the interview.

There's your answer, Yip.
 
Last edited:
No it won't

A four-year degree does not guarantee an interview. More TJ PIC than the 4-yr degree guy, will get you an interview at 172 of the 177 interviewing that do not require or make the 4-yr thing preferred. BTW where is the list of the airlines hiring beside UPS and FedEx that make the degree a showstopper?

 
Last edited:
My "TJPIC" is bigger than your "TJPIC," or, so much for the "whole-man" concept

pilotyip said:
A four-year degree does not guarantee an interview. More TJ PIC than the 4-yr degree guy, will get you an interview at 172 of the 177 interviewing that do not require or make the 4-yr thing preferred.
Is that an absolute, Yip? What about the other things sought after in the "whole-man" concept of hiring? Which is it, then, "TJPIC" or whole-man??
BTW where is the list of the airlines hiring beside UPS and FedEx that make the degree a showstopper?
As a practical matter, without it when it is clearly "preferred" (note how that sneaky little word pops in), it may as well be a "showstopper" for them, too. In other words, Yip, and, as a hiring authority, you would know this better than any of us poor, sorry (ex) career-builders, the quality of the applicant pool drives the overall hiring profile. Meaning, if the applicant pool is primarily comprised of college graduates, it is those folks who have the advantage.

To that end, once more, Yip, I direct your attention to the old FAPA Career Pilot magazine column, "Congratulations, FAPA Pilots." That column listed FAPA members whom the majors, nationals and turbojets recently hired. Educational background would be listed. I do not recall one pilot listed who had only high school. Most were college graduates or better, with the others having at least some college.

On the subject of FAPA, I stopped subscribing to Kit Darby materials/propaganda/sophistries/pie-in-the-sky many years ago, so, sorry, Yip, I don't have access to his "list."
 
Last edited:
I didn't read through the entire thread either.

I did learn a very valuable lesson about college, something I wished I had known when I first encountered a miserable instructor.

The lesson is "how to drop a course."

Unlike high school where if you had a poor instructor you were stuck with the flaming jerk for a whole semester. That's not true in college. Drop the idiot and take a different class, even at the small private colleges.

Fly SAFE!
Jedi Nein
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom