glasspilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Posts
- 1,622
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, we aren't going away anytime soon, and all it will take is a sale to a bigger nonunion group and decert will happen instantly.
WORSE YET, the NJ's guys dumped IBT perhaps so we won't be the same union, so their BIGGER group will have no qualms about stapling the entire flops group to the bottom.
(BTW "Glass Pilot" obviously you don't even work for a frac based on your a/c profile, so what makes you think YOU know how "unstable" my words are? You haven't a CLUE what is going on here)
VOR-
I've been around KR for a long time.
I'm sure KR doesn't want Flight Options to be hamstrung by a CBA. However, a comprehensive scope clause will go a long way towards protecting us from the scenario you proffer. I think we all need to see how the scope clause will read before we start worrying about the sky falling.
...and experience says we will be sold yet again.
I won't dispute the possiblity. My point is if scope is crafted properly in the CBA, it shouldn't matter.
You did bring up a good point in a prior post when you commented about NJA pilots leaving 1108. I know there is an agreement between 1108 and ASAP to work together on "future projects". I would like to learn more about what exactly this agreement outlines. Perhaps the structure has already been put in place for seniority list integration that could result from a merger.
I won't dispute the possiblity. My point is if scope is crafted properly in the CBA, it shouldn't matter.
Is it possible to craft a scope that will survive through:
- a company that has a bigger (and anti-union) group of pilots acquires or is acquired by Flops?
- a company that has a bigger (DIFFERENT union) pilot group that acquires or is acquired by Flops (and may staple...what if THEY have an iron clad scope clause)?
-Flops selling off the operation in parts
-Flops turning the operation into something other than fractional (charter, lease, managed, new variation of operating not yet named that KR will again "invent")?
-Contract pilots flooding the operation
????
Why the hell would NJA want a steaming pile of Beechjets?I hope there is a way to protect that, WORSE YET, the NJ's guys dumped IBT perhaps so we won't be the same union, so their BIGGER group will have no qualms about stapling the entire flops group to the bottom. Yup, laugh, but I'll pull this post up yet again when it happens. After all, we're ALL in the "USED aircraft" business now aren't we? One & the same :nuts:
Why the hell would NJA want a steaming pile of Beechjets?
I won't dispute the possiblity. My point is if scope is crafted properly in the CBA, it shouldn't matter. I agree with that.
You did bring up a good point in a prior post when you commented about NJA pilots leaving 1108. I know there is an agreement between 1108 and ASAP to work together on "future projects". I would like to learn more about what exactly this agreement outlines. The idea is to work together on industry wide issues (like user fees) that will affect both pilotgroups. Perhaps the structure has already been put in place for seniority list integration that could result from a merger. The only structure that has been put in place is the new EBoard position -- VP of Industry Affairs...![]()