Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Not so fast AirTran

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Southwest Air plans Chicago expansion due to ATA

Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:35 AM ET

DALLAS, Oct 28 (Reuters) - Southwest Airlines Chief Executive Gary Kelly said on Thursday his carrier plans to step up operations in Chicago due to ATA's bankruptcy, and Southwest may bid on some of ATA's assets.
Kelly said Southwest will start adding flights in Chicago from the first quarter of 2005. He also said the carrier is looking at bidding on the Boeing 737-800 planes in ATA's fleet.

"There is no desire on our part to stand still in Chicago," Kelly told reporters.
 
You mean how would we feel

about flying their routes while they train our replacements? Thank God for Daley and Doug Parker. This AI deal is not in our best interest.

Also SWA indicated that they would like our gates and are jets. Their history is one of taking people with aircraft.

I like the AI pilots, but am wary of their management's plans.
 
CMonBoard said:
What's the feeling among the pilots and other employees at TZ re: the current facts?
Are you thinking a deal with AirTran for wet leasing would be a positive or a negative?
Would you leave sooner than later and apply at AirTran?
Would you rather sit out and wait until another carrier makes a different offer?

This is all just speculation, as I'm sure you won't get a call during dinner asking your opinion on this one...I'm just curious what you think.

The emotions run the gammit. Most are relieved that Ge0rge is not in control anymore, all are scared and uncertain. Lots of speculation on the union webboard right now.

As for the facts and AirTran, it is definately looked at as a big huge NEGATIVE on this property unless your name is Ge0rge. Ge0rge is taking care of Ge0rge and the folks that work for him in IND with this deal; to heck with Chicago and those that work there. The FL wet-lease signals no inclination to take any flightcrews or airframes, just to fill the void until they get their people and equipment in place.

Time will tell, but IMO, the FL offer has little chance getting by the Judge. The only party it is good for is FL and Ge0rge. Boeing and the related leasing companies stand to loose big on this one and I cannot see them being happy with FL or anyone else for that matter not taking or offering at the 30-50 airframes that could get parked, not to mention the thousands of employees in the Chicago market that stand to loose their jobs. This has a long way to go before the final curtain call.

Most have already applied to all the usual airlines that are hiring, with mixed results. My feeling now is that it would be best to sit tight and see what happens.

Good luck to all.

As a side note, I have not run into a finer group of people than those ex-TWA people we have on the property. I have flown, commuted, and conversed with several of you in the last 1-2 years and cannot remember a finer group of true Professionals. I will always hold you people and your former employer in the highest regard.
 
If I was an ATA pilot, I would not be happy about this either.

The only good thing about the deal is that at least AirTran would have to contract with ATA to keep flying the routes for a while, whereas if the gates and slots get divvied up to, say, NWA, CAL, SWA and AWA, they could start operating them on their own immediately, and that flying would just disappear immediately for the ATA crews.

As far as Boeing being "upset" with AirTran . . . . Boeing is the largest shareholder of AirTran stock, and we are one of the few US passenger carriers taking delivery of new Boeings right now.

Regardless, we all know that it is a lousy situation for the ATA folks. Maybe a better offer will come along.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the airtran deal even has a chance. The bankruptcy judge has to take care of the creditors and the atsb loan is a big factor. AWA has stated they would assume the atsb loan and ATA debt. Oh and bring the employees. Because AWA or SWA didn't make offers first doesn't mean **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**. I wouldn't make the first offer either, they both have 60 days from the filing to make offers.

On a positive note GM is out of the drivers seat now! He can make deals with whomever he wants and it doesn't amount to a hill a beans. For 31 years these working stiffs at this airline have been making him rich--flying airplanes to airports other US carriers don't know exist, with the best safety record. In the end it's break one off in your ass time. We see whos out for who.

I read the airtran mec letter to the pilot group. Not even a fart about hiring us or even preferential interviews. Thanks!
 
MDP727 said:
flying airplanes to airports other US carriers don't know exist, with the best safety record. In the end it's break one off in your ass time. We see whos out for who.

I read the airtran mec letter to the pilot group. Not even a fart about hiring us or even preferential interviews. Thanks!
I couldn't agree more. We have sixty days now to see what plays out. Sit tight, it'll be a wild ride.
 
MDP727 said:
.

I read the airtran mec letter to the pilot group. Not even a fart about hiring us or even preferential interviews. Thanks!
While I understand everyone's hurt, fear and bitternerss, how about a dose of reality? First of all Air Tran doesn't have an "MEC", they have a "BOD". Second, do you think, even for a moment, that the Air Tran pilots were contacted about their approval, denial or input with regards to this deal? Were YOU and YOUR pilot group consulted by YOUR management. He11 no. They do what they want to do, WITHOUT consulting ANY pilots. So why you feel the need to take your anger out on the Air Tran pilots I guess is just a relection of yourself. Maybe you should look in the mirror.

Finally, who ever said that just because AAI is offering cash to ATA for gate leases and slots at LGA and DCA automatically entitles you to a job with Air Tran? Typical.:rolleyes:

If you have a b1tch with this deal, then you should take it up with the ones who made it. YOUR company management and that of Air Tran. Taking it out on another pilot group that had absolutely ZERO input in this is typically asinine. And typically self-centered. WHAT ABOUT MEEEEEEEEEE?????
 
Ty Webb said:
As far as Boeing being "upset" with AirTran . . . . Boeing is the largest shareholder of AirTran stock, and we are one of the few US passenger carriers taking delivery of new Boeings right now.

Good point, bad choice of words on my part. I do not believe anyone should be upset with FL, it is just business. Looks like FL is not going to be the only dog in this hunt, it will interesting.
 
NZCHooverboy said:
Also SWA indicated that they would like our gates and are jets. Their history is one of taking people with aircraft.

QUOTE]

A history that they do not wish to repeat. Preferential interview at best.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top