Nobody will be able to fly for hire after 65

[AirBear8]

If the age 65 language survives, it will ONLY apply to NetJets since it was custom written for them. It specifies over 100,000 operations per year, and only NetJets has that many. A new PAC composed of NJA Pilots opposed to this bill has formed. Their best bet at getting it voted down is to highlight publicly how it only applies to NJA and to get that language stripped out so that it will apply to all Part 135. Then all the alphabet soup of aviation groups will come in opposed to it.

The Latest timeline for a vote on this is mid to late summer.

 

[rajflyboy]

Another case of the few bad folks hurting the good of the whole group

if you are too old RETIRE

you are only losing respect from your co workers

 

[CALRepublic]

"if you're too old retire, you're loosing respect from your coworkers"

one thing I know about these old guys, they DO NOT give a s#*t what people think

either you push them out or they're staying. simple

 

[rajflyboy]

"if you're too old retire, you're loosing respect from your coworkers"

one thing I know about these old guys, they DO NOT give a s#*t what people think

either you push them out or they're staying. simple

for these select few I believe that to be the case

it’s sad because there are a bunch who are still doing the job well