ALPA has the ability to accept and reject bid run solutions. No one else has that. No one. If management starts to exploit "loopholes" in the agreement all ALPA has to do is reject the bid runs. It really is that simple.
They can do that 3 times in a 6 month period. Each time a coin toss will determine which sides solution will be used. So maybe they could reject it about 50% of 3 times in a 6 month period. If they dispute more it will go to arbitration. What reason would they give the arbitrator for not taking the companies lines? There is no guidance on this, and who is to say that one solution is better than another. Like you guys keep pointing out what one person likes isn’t always what another person wants.
Remember it’s the computer that is going to make lines for just about everyone. Only a little wiggle room for certain people that probably left a vague bid or is so junior they only get the leftovers.
Last edited: