Tomct
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2004
- Posts
- 2,062
The nail in the coffin isn't that the 5%-8% would drain our money supply. The problem is that 5% to 8% will cause Jerry Atkin and the stockholders to believe that we are too expensive, and they will phase out our portion of the operation. Bye bye union, bye bye job. Get it yet?
And yes, we may be stockholders, but we aren't Stockholders with a capital S... In other words, your few thousand dollars of stock do not come even close to the influence of the guy that owns 5 million dollars in stock... That guy doesn't give a rats butt about your payrate, and he wants the minimum costs. Otherwise, he will vote every time to phase out your job to a less expensive division of the company.
Our only defense is to do our jobs the best we can, and to keep competitive within the industry. That may mean that ASA is no longer a "Career Company". It certainly will mean that we do not have industry leading pay rates.
Either way, I need ASA until I get my PIC time up to snuff, so don't screw me out of a job just because you want 5% more a year.
Dude, maybe you better re-read the last paragraph of your post. Who is thinking ONLY of THEMSELVES? I....I.....I. You just pissed on everything that you so "eloquently"