Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NJ- round 2 begins

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
They should've brought them back before they were needed and before they started taking crews off existing aircraft
 
They should've brought them back before they were needed and before they started taking crews off existing aircraft


Dude,

The company just pulled 4 flight attendants out of the Gulfstream and shipped them to another fleet because the Gulfstream is "overstaffed."

Meanwhile. 10-15 percent of Gulfstream trips are going WITHOUT A FLIGHT ATTENDANT!

Do you really think this bunch has ANY clue how to staff the company?
 
LOL. That's funny and a little sad
 
Last edited:
Dude,

The company just pulled 4 flight attendants out of the Gulfstream and shipped them to another fleet because the Gulfstream is "overstaffed."

Meanwhile. 10-15 percent of Gulfstream trips are going WITHOUT A FLIGHT ATTENDANT!

Do you really think this bunch has ANY clue how to staff the company?

A simple welcome back would have sufficed. :p
 
Uh...more like 25%.


Obviously, the company is loathe to admit real numbers. I'm going by an informal poll of friends in the fleet and my experience...


Including YESTERDAY. With one of Warren's inner circle :erm:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top