Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New Dash Video--hopfully not gay

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If it's finance-related, and especially if it came from an airline, it does not turn to dust before I do. But that's what I'm saying here; I keep track of all this sh!t till death, so I've really exhausted all possibilities here, short of tracking down the CA and having him sign an affidavit. But as I remember, he was usually busy with some woman at any given time, otherwise it'd be really practical for me to do. :rolleyes:
 
Meanwhile, in other news...

WickedPissa said:
I was a junior FO but knew this was a dumbass thing to do since my face almost hit the prop sinc.

Yup, concur, especially in the Dash. There's very little reason to slam folks into the seat backs in that airplane. (And before anybody else decides to jump Booker's shi!t tonight, in nearly 1500 hours in type, I never, ever put the f**king thing into reverse, not once, not even in a 300, not even on my last GD trip!) Anyway, it always makes me shake my head when I see guys in the jet grease it on 2800 feet down the runway while doing Vref+15 at 50% N1, only to force everyone to brace while they "make that next high-speed." Yeah, real smooth. Oh, and I don't fly for Mesa as previously slandered. Go from PDT to Mesa? Uh-huh, whatever.
 
Sig said:
Got a flight number? Still doubt a 300 went in there. The reason I call boolsheet is the fact we're always, always, always overweight in the 100. It makes good sense to drive a 300 into HHH, which totally precludes it ever going into there...

***I'm not saying you made it up, Booker. I'm saying in light of how this place runs, I'm hard pressed to believe they'd make such a smart choice.

Ok...

4/26/04, flight 4189 CLT-HXD. Dash 8-311 N335EN.

That is one time, a quick look shows me doing it about a dozen times over a 9 month period.
 
LowlyPropCapt said:
Ok...

4/26/04, flight 4189 CLT-HXD. Dash 8-311 N335EN.

That is one time, a quick look shows me doing it about a dozen times over a 9 month period.

I'll be DAN MED. It makes too much sense to send a 300 in there... so they won't! But... did. WOW. Yup, I was dead wrong.
 
Sig said:
I'll be DAN MED. It makes too much sense to send a 300 in there... so they won't! But... did. WOW. Yup, I was dead wrong.

Yeah, we could carry 50 pax in. The problem was, even with a flaps 15 TO, it was impossible to carry 50 out. IIRC, I think the best I ever did was 41 folks and that was with not so much gas. God help you if you had to depart toward the lumber yard on 21.

The -200 makes the most sense out of there. Unless it is wicked hot and you have to use 21, you could make full folks+bags happen out of there. I wonder how a Q400 would do? Shoot are the taxiways even stressed for that kind of wieght?
 
Sig said:
Yup, I was dead wrong.
Um, yeah. Did you even see my final edit to post #54? I give you a date, trip number, flight number, block times, tail number, and crew info and get nothing, but LPC posts three out of the six and suddenly the light is seen? WTF man? :rolleyes: By the way, maybe look at my subsequent post, below, before responding. :)
 
Last edited:
Booker said:
Um, yeah. Did you even see my final edit to post #54? I give you a date, trip number, flight number, block times, tail number, and crew info and get nothing, but LPC posts three out of the six and suddenly the light is seen? WTF man? :rolleyes:

I guess I am just more reliable! (Jokes man, Jokes!)

I actually commited the cardinal flightinfo sin and didn't look ahead to see that someone had already replied to sig. Sorry for stepping on your toes.
 
LowlyPropCapt said:
I guess I am just more reliable! (Jokes man, Jokes!)
Yeah, anyone who flew with me at PDT knows how reliable I can be! I didn't think you were stepping on my toes at all; I actually appreciated the backup. If anything, it's my bad; I should have created a new post vice editing the old one after Sig had already responded. No hard feelings towards anyone on this thread. I'm just bitter because I could have download a lot of porn in the time it took to get this all sorted out. :D

Much love...
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top