QCappy
Left Coaster
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Posts
- 521
Lets say those numbers are accurate. That's 16% up front going back to a May 05 DOS.
The farthest it can go back is to a May 07 DOS. The Kasher reaming was a two year deal from May 05.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lets say those numbers are accurate. That's 16% up front going back to a May 05 DOS.
25.E.5, 23.A.1 and 23.A.3 for starters
Easy now team....I have the utmost respect for our MEC Chair and I think the negotiating committee are doing an ok job. What I'm spewing about is some of the recent decisions (or lack there of) by our MEC (not one man.)
In recent weeks it seems that we are loosing track of the MEC main job - to protect it's dues paying members and at the SAME time to negotiate the best contract for the ENTIRE pilot group.
Recently we've seen furloughs while members are flying 85 hour lines & VSA.
We've seen the company flatly deny paid moves to displaces pilots unless pilots move their entire households.
And now (yesterday) we are seeing a complete disregard for our seniority system. While I am all for retaining as many pilots on the payroll as possible - I think it is a very slippery slope when the MEC allows pilots to stay in base out of seniority.
I too have been furloughed before for over 5 years and I know it's not an easy thing to process. But as turbodriver says - "Don't sign a crappy contact just to get me back early. That's my vote. I want something good to come back to."
Mookie - I came here because I thought this was a strong and upward moving company. Since I've been here my class has gone nowhere but backwards - and there's no end in sight. Yes I'm glad I'm not wearing a Johny Cash outfit flying for 2/3'rds wage (I never would have.) But I think we deserve a lot more than 9%. I'm thinking 40% + retro. This may be a vast improvement from skyw's non-union atmosphere but still nowhere close to the hardball ALPA of NWA. Put down your cup of koolaid Mook and dig those heels in & see what's happening.
That's it for now friends, colleagues, & brothers....Time to get some rest before the big drive up the coast. Can't wait for the $0.20 a mile per the AAA for reimbursement. (Insert sarcasm here.)
Baja Out.
The farthest it can go back is to a May 07 DOS. The Kasher reaming was a two year deal from May 05.
Sorry, Crunk, but tossing out a bunch of numbers like you know what you're talking about without expanding on them is pretty useless.
For example, 25.E.5 does not exist.
23.A.1:
1. Reduce Bid Blocks: In the event the Company furloughs pilots,
the Company and the MEC shall meet and establish a program for reducing the number of hours in the bid blocks to prevent the furlough.
I don't know what bid package you're looking at, but the line values in SEA have dropped to 75-77 hours. Plus the part time line program was agreed to and implemented. That pretty much satisfies 23.A.1.
23.A.3:
Details of: When a furlough is scheduled the Company shall post a notice at all pilot bases advising of the effective date of the furlough, anticipated length of the furlough, and the number of pilots to be furloughed. As soon as possible after the posting of the notice, the Company shall notify each of the affected pilots, by certified mail, return receipt requested, at his home address, of the actual date of his furlough.
For the first group of furloughs, Pilot Bid 2009-02 would seem to cover all the bases required by Sec. 23.A.3.
So, what's the big deal?
I'm not an expert at the contract. And I'm learning one that is relatively new to me.
I'm pretty sure there is a greivance on the length of the furlough not being posted. Some of the furloughees are finding prospective employers won't give you a shot if you can't tell them how long you'll be there.
Give them a call. You'd be surprised how many guys formulate and postulate "opinions" and how few calls the guys with the answers in the office get.
Using "Indefinite" as a length of estimated furlough is not an acceptable option in my opinion. For those of us on the street, it makes it difficult to plan when the time length is that indeterminate. I own and run a side business in the medical field (now my primary business). Trying to write business contracts that I know I can follow through on (without using a 30 day out clause) is challenging without having more information. "Indefinite" won't work in the contracts that I am involved with and is less than professional.
I wonder....
Can furloughees vote on a TA???