Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering 2/3 of our current fleet is made up of the 117 seat variety, I don't see many guys interested in relaxing our current scope limit of 70 seats and a limit of 10% of our total ASMs. The other good news is you can't make money with CRJ-200s hauling people to Florida for $79 so I don't see 50 seaters being a major issue. You may see a few 50 seaters on a revenue share deal for thinner MKE routes but I really don't see them doing routes like CAK-FLL, IND-RSW, or PIT-MCO.mang will give you those rates, you're ALPA now, they will give up all scope for those rates
Don't plan on those rates. Its called negotiating. Ask high, and settle for less. The question will be how much less. I think those rates are pretty favorable but don't expect them to be the final rates we see. However, I don't think that they should be much less then that, because I don't think much less will pass.
Don't oversimplify the situation to hourly rates only. Retirement contribution percentage, work rules, scheduling transparency, and scope plus pay rates are going to be big parts of the whole package. We don't need any Section 4 only guys this time around, we had plenty of them for the TA2 vote 3 years ago.He also stated that Alaska +1% is the absolute rock bottom, we will go on strike pay rates that the union will bring to the pilot group in a TA.
Don't oversimplify the situation to hourly rates only. Retirement contribution percentage, work rules, scheduling transparency, and scope plus pay rates are going to be big parts of the whole package. We don't need any Section 4 only guys this time around, we had plenty of them for the TA2 vote 3 years ago.