Baja,
You probably already know what I'm going to say......but I'll go ahead and say it anyway.
Even if you put a gun to my head, I wouldn't fly for any Pt. 121 passenger carrier out there. I don't care who it is......SWA included. Absolutely no stability in the market. What happens when the price of oil jumps up to $100 a barrel? Hello employees, this is management.....we need some more paycuts so that we can compete, we need to change work rules, we need to increase productivity. Do they pass the cost of doing business on to the paying passenger? Goodness no! Why do that when they can pass that cost on to the employees?
Also, QOL at the Majors (Delta, in my personal experience) has gone from "outstanding" (prior to 9-11) to "miserable" (present day). I quit Delta to go to NetJets.....does that tell you anything about how much it sucks there? I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut that the NWA that you once knew and loved (prior to your furlough) is nothing like present day NWA in terms of pay/work rules/pension/morale. Look at the NWA FAs for a morale reference point. If you went back there, I am confident that you would hate it. As for Alaska.....nice folks, with great North/South routes for a West Coast guy, but nonetheless still subject to the same market forces as any other Pt. 121 pax carrier. Not exactly stable, IMHO.
If you're looking for a career with stability, I think that I would target UPS/FedEx first, NetJets second, and everything else a distant third. I know that there are many here that would give their left testicle to fly for SWA....and maybe that would be a great fit for you if you really wanted to fly for a Pt. 121 pax carrier. If that is the case, maybe you should put SWA up there after the Cargo carriers. They are doing quite well, and have prospered when everyone else has lost their collective asses for the last 5 years. It's just not my cup of tea.
Good luck buddy......it's nice to have options, isn't it?