Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NetJets Strike Vote Fails

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Whats the turnover at NetJets? Talked with a FLOPs dude he said they are losing ten a month.
 
dukeofdub said:
So do you intend to raise management fees? You must look at all the costs associated with management fees as they are the major source of income. Therfore the intelligent thing to do is to look at all the books and understand the cost of all aspects and all income streams. If you just look at management fees you would lose 30% of the potential income to the Company.
I do not know why its so difficult. When fuel prices go up we charge more for fuel. When pilot prices go up charge more for pilots.

BB has said pilot salaries come from management fees. How will looking at other revenues help me.... it just gives management an excuse to cry poor.

Yes raise management fees.

Keep it simple. If my pay comes from management fees, make sure those fees are enough to do the job.
 
hammer2 said:
Whats the turnover at NetJets? Talked with a FLOPs dude he said they are losing ten a month.

That number is accurate for NJA also.

What makes me worry more is we have lost 170 owners since the first of the year.

Is it time to man the life rafts?
 
Hogprint said:
That number is accurate for NJA also.

What makes me worry more is we have lost 170 owners since the first of the year.

Is it time to man the life rafts?

Thats the plan. Lose 170 quarter share owners and then sell 1360 marquis cards.
 
Hogprint said:
What makes me worry more is we have lost 170 owners since the first of the year.

Is it time to man the life rafts?

As an owner, I had a request where I told my account mgr that I need to upgrade my contracted aircraft type to a Citation X, since my passenger needed to get from SFO to NYC the quickest way possible. I made the time element of the request very clear.

Pax gets to the aircraft at SFO, only to be told by the crew that since they are going to go past their duty limits, they will stop in Columbus for a crew change!!!! No I'm sorry, no we don't know how this happened, no excuse what-so-ever!

If this is the attitude displayed, you guys better be manning the life rafts. I'm sure we're not the only owner to have to put up with these types of childish games.

And when the contract comes up for renewal, you can bet that I'm going to be looking very closely at FX, CS & FO, something I would have never done before!

You made your beds, now lie in them!
 
PMVULB AvMgr said:
Pax gets to the aircraft at SFO, only to be told by the crew that since they are going to go past their duty limits, they will stop in Columbus for a crew change!!!!

It's the FAA that mandates duty limits.
 
PMVULB AvMgr said:
As an owner, I had a request where I told my account mgr that I need to upgrade my contracted aircraft type to a Citation X, since my passenger needed to get from SFO to NYC the quickest way possible. I made the time element of the request very clear.

Pax gets to the aircraft at SFO, only to be told by the crew that since they are going to go past their duty limits, they will stop in Columbus for a crew change!!!! No I'm sorry, no we don't know how this happened, no excuse what-so-ever!

This is a scheduling problem not a crew problem. How much time in advance did you give the schedulers? What were some of the other circumstances? Did you complain to your Owner service rep? What did they tell you?

If this is the attitude displayed, you guys better be manning the life rafts. I'm sure we're not the only owner to have to put up with these types of childish games.

Exactly what did you want this crew to do? Fly past their FAA mandated duty day/flight time? You need to wake up pal. Unfortunately we see this more and more on the road. Once again...not the crews problem. Scheduling knew this crew was on the tail end of their day.

And when the contract comes up for renewal, you can bet that I'm going to be looking very closely at FX, CS & FO, something I would have never done before!

If you are this arrogant and ignorant of the rules we must abide by, then by all means, do us ALL a favor and look at the rest.

You made your beds, now lie in them!

Rest assured, we are laying in the bed that Netjets has made. I don't like it and you don't seem to like it.

Let me ask you this...do you ever feel this company has lied to you? Do you feel your not getting your moneys worth of your "Netjets experience"? Do you feel you being squeezed out by card holders?

Have you even thought about this or do you just blame the crew for something they had no control over?
 
Sounds to me like SCHEDULING should have allocated a different crew to your trip. There are several other operators who look at regulations with a bleary eye.


The crew ran out of duty time.
 
Last edited:
Hogprint said:
Rest assured, we are laying in the bed that Netjets has made. I don't like it and you don't seem to like it.

Let me ask you this...do you ever feel this company has lied to you? Do you feel your not getting your moneys worth of your "Netjets experience"? Do you feel you being squeezed out by card holders?

Have you even thought about this or do you just blame the crew for something they had no control over?

Nobody likes it when something like this happens. It appears that you are fueling the fire of the "attitude." It is unfortunate and somebody, somewhere made an error that caused the issue. If it was scheduling then it needs to be corrected. If it was pilots excerising their god given right to proceede as slowly as possible in preflight and reviewing the brief until they would go over on duty time, then that needs to be corrected. It used to be that everyone worked to give the Owners the NetJets experience, but more and more the Owners recieve the Strong Union ecperience and they don't like the "attitude."
 
PMVULB AvMgr said:
As an owner, I had a request where I told my account mgr that I need to upgrade my contracted aircraft type to a Citation X, since my passenger needed to get from SFO to NYC the quickest way possible. I made the time element of the request very clear.

Pax gets to the aircraft at SFO, only to be told by the crew that since they are going to go past their duty limits, they will stop in Columbus for a crew change!!!! No I'm sorry, no we don't know how this happened, no excuse what-so-ever!

If this is the attitude displayed, you guys better be manning the life rafts. I'm sure we're not the only owner to have to put up with these types of childish games.

And when the contract comes up for renewal, you can bet that I'm going to be looking very closely at FX, CS & FO, something I would have never done before!

You made your beds, now lie in them!
First, let me tell you that I feel your pain. Countless times the company hangs their pilots out there with no rhyme or reason as to why they screwed up an owner's request. I do believe that the crew had no knowledge of your trip requirements until you made it known to them. Otherwise, why would the company assign them your trip when they know and track every crew's duty day? Sounds like your problem lies with your Owner Services Team and Scheduling, not the pilots. We only do what the Head Shed tells us to and we won't break any FARs for you. If we did, trust me, the company would self-disclose us to the FAA in a heartbeat and we would be the ones left holding the bag. Maybe Flex Jet, Flight Options, Citation Shares, or some other pilots will break the rules for you but I wouldn't depend on it.

Again, sorry that Owner Services or Scheduling gave you the shaft. Hope you voice your concerns with the folks that caused you this inconvenience and not the pilots.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top