Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RNO, I don't consider differing opinions to constitute an argument...It's not what I "hear" (though that is a lot) as much as the hard work that I see produced by the UTC. The fact that the company has been slow to implement the programs designed by the UTC is not that committee's fault. Not everyone in management was open to improving the product and that has caused difficulty. There's also bound to be a good deal of mistrust and hard feelings after such a protracted contract battle. Attitudes like that hinder progress, but I can assure you that it hasn't been for lack of trying by the UTC who has done a great job and should be fully supported by the pilots. When you look at the status of the training program remind yourself that you can lead a horse to water....but you can't make it drink...
That said, I don't think it's as hopeless as that. This past week saw a big step in the right direction and the UTC is gearing up for more hard work. If you have questions about the committee's efforts and their progress to date why not give the Chairman a call or email him? I agree that specific details aren't appropriate for this forum. As for what I hear...you'd be surprised... I have an excellent grasp on the reality of the situation and quite thoroughly understand the frustration involved on all sides.
Wishing you all good flights and happy days at home,
Netjetwife
... You talk about being professionals in the tipping thread, yet to me being able to spell and use proper grammar to get a point across, particularly in the written word, is much more the mark of a professional. ...![]()
...much to the aggravation of some of you....![]()
Diesel--please reread my post. I said " I hardly think my husband is the only pilot who points out to the schedulers... That means that I certainly can't believe my husband is "the only guy calling in scheduling snafu's." Now come on Diesel, if you're going to pick on my post at least do it fairly and correctly. To answer your question--I follow along closely and have excellent sources. Notice that is multiple. My comments reflect the opinions of myself and others that are very involved.
UG, the "common njw" puzzled me until I realized that my marriage status wasn't being questioned...But far be it for me--an ordinary wife
--to complain. I'll gladly leave you pilots to police yourselves--good luck on the grammar and spelling...
![]()
FG, I rather thought that those who followed the NJ saga would see the obvious--profits were realized after management decided to motivate the pilots by giving them (most, at least) a fair deal. I mentioned the other efforts because I thought it only right to give both parties credit for their efforts at working together. As to buying BH shares, most NJ families were/are making up for the basic components they fell behind on. New homes, vehicles, college funds, and bringing up the 401K hold a higher priority right now. Considering that many pilots also had a lot of debt to pay off, as well, the signing bonus didn't stretch as far as you seem to think it did. The other points were well stated by Ozpilot.
LF, one should not mistake optimism for less attractive behavior...Clearly, both sides stand to gain more by working together. The point I was making is that some progress in that regard is now being made--finally. It's a beginning and the possibility of a relationship built on mutual respect has never been better, even though there is a long road ahead.
RNO, I don't consider differing opinions to constitute an argument...It's not what I "hear" (though that is a lot) as much as the hard work that I see produced by the UTC. The fact that the company has been slow to implement the programs designed by the UTC is not that committee's fault. Not everyone in management was open to improving the product and that has caused difficulty. There's also bound to be a good deal of mistrust and hard feelings after such a protracted contract battle. Attitudes like that hinder progress, but I can assure you that it hasn't been for lack of trying by the UTC who has done a great job and should be fully supported by the pilots. When you look at the status of the training program remind yourself that you can lead a horse to water....but you can't make it drink...
That said, I don't think it's as hopeless as that. This past week saw a big step in the right direction and the UTC is gearing up for more hard work. If you have questions about the committee's efforts and their progress to date why not give the Chairman a call or email him? I agree that specific details aren't appropriate for this forum. As for what I hear...you'd be surprised... I have an excellent grasp on the reality of the situation and quite thoroughly understand the frustration involved on all sides.
Wishing you all good flights and happy days at home,
Netjetwife
Like I said posting on a messageboard with a bb its tough to see all the mistakes.
Like I said posting on a messageboard with a bb its tough to see all the mistakes.
2 bläckberries. i äm like superman. got the whole belt thing and all.
gun why edit. you can just have njw edit them for you and send it to you in a pm for repost.
I find it disappointing that you don't give more credit to your fellow pilots who devote much of their free time to working on improvements that will benefit everyone at NJA. Much work goes on behind the scenes before the final unveiling of new programs. Their projects are on-going and they're far from finished. I think you're being hasty in your judgment.
If $2B invested then $143M is 7% return.
If $1B invested then $143M is a 14% return...PLUS the Appreciation of the asset from $1B to $2B if $1B was invested and the company is now worth $2B. Someone could probably figure out what the appreciation has been.
My house appreciated more than the total of alll the mortgage payments in the last 3 yrs but I have not received any income from it.... But I still think I am getting a good return.
I think Stocks trade normally at a company valuation of 15... up to 20 times earnings.
That would make NJ worth 143M X 15 = $2.1B to 143M X 20 = $2.8B.
If we could push profits to $200M to $250M ... then at 15 times earnings the company could be worth $3B to $3.75B.
BRK could increase in value $1B to 1.75B on NJ in just one yr. 50 to 80% Asset appreciation! PLUS the $200M in Income! Thats A LOT better than the 25% Berkshire returned on average!
I think this increase is achievable because there is a lot of inefficiency that can and will be reduced. I wish there was a NJ stock.... I could buy.
Mad Money KRAMER says BUY BUY BUY!
I guess this means you don't understand mathematics.This is just downright painful to read. Stick to the FMS and the AFM, friend, and hire someone else to do your investing.
netjetwife said:I may not be able to fly but I can write....much to the aggravation of some of you....![]()