Need to get an ATP certificate

[svcta]

Why pay for a rating that someone else will pay for when they type you? I'm with you, Mr. Original Poster. But don't sweat the checkride, it should be easy. That part Avbug got right.

 

[avbug]

An SIC type doesn't require a checkride...basically just document the same 61.55 copilot training we've been doing for years (systems, 3 T&L's, CRM, Engine-out maneuvering, IIRC) slightly diffrerently, and take it to the Fed Shed to get the rating issued.

I'm well aware of that. But not at an airline. An airline doesn't simply train to three bounces and let a pilot go. A pilot has been trained to, and performs at the same level, as that required for the type, and most places the SIC checkride is essentially the same as a PIC checkride.

Generally one can't simply take evidence of the SIC ride to the FAA to obtain an ATP. One will need to demonstrate for the ATP with a dedicated practical test.

However, again, if one is waiting until one has three thousand hours and then seeks the ATP in order to bolster one's resume, one is behind the curve. Regardless, go take the checkride, rent an airplane and set up the ride with the FAA or a designated examiner, and take the practical test. It's not a big deal.

 

[say again]

Wow Avbug, I never knew that getting my ATP at 3600 hrs put me behind the "curve". I guess I'm lucky that my career has progressed nicely, even prior to the almighty ATP.
Give the guy a break, not everyone needs an ATP at 1500 hrs. I flight instructed until I had 2100 hrs and worked at ACA til 3600 hr- so where was the need for the ATP?? After my furlough, I was hired by a company flying a BE30 AND they paid for my ATP/type-rating.

 

[MauleSkinner]

I'm well aware of that. But not at an airline.

I don't see any reason to assume that SIC qualification at an airline necessarily results in an SIC type rating. Did they change the 121/135 regs as well?

 

[avbug]

Airlines generally issue a SIC type today, if not the PIC type. Some erroneously call the PIC type a "captain type."

Regardless of whether any rating is issued, point is that airlines don't simply do three bounces and call it good. Training generally covers the same material, and is often done to the same standard. One really shouldn't be there anyway unless one can perform to the ATP standard.

One cannot take the paperwork from one's proficiency or sim check and simply obtain an ATP, even documenting the actions taken or performed in the simulator or in an oral. However, the practical test is adequate preparation for one who intends to go elsewhere to obtain the rating.

I've taken many checkrides, including early in my career, during which the ATP could easily have been done. However, when I had adequate experience, I obtained the ATP on my own. One who is interested in furthering his qualifications and making himself more marketable might certainly take it upon himself to lift a finger to further his qualifications, rather than waiting for another to give it to him.

Wow Avbug, I never knew that getting my ATP at 3600 hrs put me behind the "curve".

Well, now you know.

I flight instructed until I had 2100 hrs and worked at ACA til 3600 hr- so where was the need for the ATP?? After my furlough, I was hired by a company flying a BE30 AND they paid for my ATP/type-rating.

You were fortunate. A pilot today who is attempting to make himself marketable in a market which is flooded with overqualified applicants, the majority of whom hold an ATP and a degree, is far behind the curve. A little like the parable of Christ's five virgins who failed to buy oil for their lamp...waiting for the wedding party to come by isn't the time to start looking for that lamp oil, and waiting for the job market to collapse isn't the time to start attempting to get qualified.

The "I don't need it so I won't get it" mentality is lazy at best, and apathetic and slow. It's the mentality of procrastination. Nothing stopped you from obtaining your ATP while you worked for ATA...you simply elected not to do so.

I worked for years gaining experience as a mechanic, as well as flying. With adequate experience, I tested for, and obtained, my mechanic certificate (A&P). Nobody paid me to do it, and I didn't "need it." In the years since, however, it's been put to use many times, has brought jobs to my door, has made jobs pay more because of the extra qualifications, and has given me work when the flying was scarce. It's one such example. The ATP is another...but the ATP for a pilot, even though you may not have a flying position requiring the ATP to be legal...is as much a "should have" and a "must have" as anything.

If you have the hours and the experience to qualify, there's really no excuse for not obtaining it.

When I obtained mine, I certainly didn't "need" it. I was flying single engine airplanes in the back country in decidedly very-VFR operations. Never the less, posession of the ATP opened other doors, and has continued to do so until today, when my work does require it.

The attitude of doing and obtaining the bare minimum until someone hands it to you is a poor one, indeed.

 

[BWatz]

Then again.. You have to remember it did not take 3 grand to get an ATP back then.

 

[avbug]

Three grand? Three thousand dollars, or three thousand hours? Then neither was required.

Today, neither is required.

Rent an airplane, take the practical test. Hardly three thousand.

Last year a particular employer that screens pilots in light twins for a job that is decidely not light twins, called me to show up for a flight screening. I arrived a day early, rented a light twin for a couple of hours, and prepared and at the same time regained currency in a light, piston twin. It cost me a few dollars. The next day I took the screening flight, passed, was offered a position.

You can easily do the same. Rent a light twin, spend an hour or two getting familiar if you like, then go fly the maneuvers for the ATP as part of the practical test. It certainly won't cost three "grand," nor does it require three thousand hours of experience to do. It's a simple, instrument checkride, for crying out loud.

 

[BWatz]

I am not going to argue with you, but I think you are a little off on this one. No where did I say it takes 3 thousand hours to meet the experience requirements for an ATP certificate.. No one on this thread has said the ATP checkride is anything more than an instrument checkride.. We get it. We all understand. The PTS says it all. No need spending all of this time hashing it out.

 

[avbug]

Very well. So, again, what do you mean by "Then again.. You have to remember it did not take 3 grand to get an ATP back then."?

No where did I say it takes 3 thousand hours to meet the experience requirements for an ATP certificate..

No, you didn't explain yourself at all. By all means, do so.

 

[BWatz]

Its not worth arguing about. I think you misunderstood what I said as an attack on you. Good luck to you