Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Need Quick Help: PPL X-Country Question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

User546

The Ultimate Show Stopper
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Posts
1,958
Part of the requirements under the Aeronautical Experience of FAR 61.109 states that a student pilot must have 3 hours of night flying to include: "One cross-country flight of over 100 nautical miles total distance..."

Does 100 miles TOTAL distance mean, that you can plan a x-country to another airport 50 miles away? To fly to that airport, and then return back to your home airport would be 100 miles total.

Or do they mean the airport needs to be 100 miles away, not to include the return leg?

Someone who has a dealt with a lot of student pilots please define this for me. I'm finishing up a students training, and I need to make sure we do this one right the first time.
 
Just like you said...100nm TOTAL distance...there and back...

1 airport 50nm away should do the trick

-mini
 
Thanks Mini...

I just wanted to clarify that, maybe I was over thinking it. But my hang up was this - to log a cross country it has to be atleast 50 nm to another airport, so naturally you'll have a 100 nm round trip. So I wasn't for sure why they didn't just say a cross country flight rather then giving a specific distance. In other words, theres no way you can do a cross country without it being atleast 100 nm.

Well anyways... ROUND OF DRINKS FOR MINI on my tab.... :D
 
That is because you may log cross country on flight shorter than 50nm. Just not for private, comm, or atp.

Flying 10 miles to another airport still counts as xc for 135 PIC purposes.

Each reg addressing xc requirements specifies what type of flight meets the definition of xc for that cert or rating. Read through the fars and you'll see what I mean.
 
User997 said:
Thanks Mini...

I just wanted to clarify that, maybe I was over thinking it. But my hang up was this - to log a cross country it has to be atleast 50 nm to another airport, so naturally you'll have a 100 nm round trip. So I wasn't for sure why they didn't just say a cross country flight rather then giving a specific distance. In other words, theres no way you can do a cross country without it being atleast 100 nm.

Well anyways... ROUND OF DRINKS FOR MINI on my tab.... :D
SWEET!

A round of pink virgin daqueries for the two beer kweer!

:p
-mini

100LL...so does that mean that I should be logging that as xc?? just can't use it for the IR/COM/ATP stuff?
 
100LL... Again! said:
That is because you may log cross country on flight shorter than 50nm. Just not for private, comm, or atp.
So are you saying that I can log x-countrys that are shorter then 50nm as long as it is not going towards any particular rating (PPL/CML/ATP) ??

If not, then please clarify some more please.
 
Yes.

Anytime you fly to another airport and land, you may count that time toward the 500 required for part 135.

To qualify for the atp, you need 500 hours of over 50 nm xc OR a flight to a point at least 50 nm straight line from departure. This was added to allow search and rescue pilots to log time toward the atp.



From memory now, so doublecheck me:

Any xc over 50 nm counts for commercial, EXCEPT for the specific day, night and long xc specified in pt 61.

For pvt, any xc over 50 counts EXCEPT for the 3-leg, one segt more that 50nm from orig pt of departure, blah, blah.

Log every bit of it in case you need to fly 135.

I used to put a small note in the logbook remarks section noting that a particular flight qualified for comm, or atp, so I could fill out my 8710 easier.
 
Again, read each reg carefully to determine each certificate's requirements.

Make sure you get the needed time.

But log the rest of it.

The FARs define xc as any flight to another airport where you use pilotage, dead reckoning, or radio nav.

Even if it is a 5 mile hop. Go figure.
 
14 CFR 61.1

(3) Cross-country time means—

(i) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) through (b)(3)(vi) of this section, time acquired during flight—

(A) Conducted by a person who holds a pilot certificate;

(B) Conducted in an aircraft;

(C) That includes a landing at a point other than the point of departure; and

(D) That involves the use of dead reckoning, pilotage, electronic navigation aids, radio aids, or other navigation systems to navigate to the landing point.
 
SEMANTICS ALERT!!

Cross-country time means—
(i) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) through (b)(3)(vi) of this section, time acquired during flight—
(A) Conducted by a person who holds a pilot certificate;
(B) Conducted in an aircraft;
(C) That includes a landing at a point other than the point of departure; and
(D) That involves the use of dead reckoning, pilotage, electronic navigation aids, radio aids, or other navigation systems to navigate to the landing point


Suppose I do a cross country with a student before they have their medical.

Does that mean that they can't log it as xc?

It's a reach, I know.



Other weird FAR question:

PVT pilot, no instrument rating.

Flying over Lake Erie at night under low overcast with 5 mi vis.

Legal, right? Absolutely NO outside references available.
Pilot must use instruments to maintain control.
Can he log actual?
 
100LL... Again! said:
SEMANTICS ALERT!!

Cross-country time means—
(i) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) through (b)(3)(vi) of this section, time acquired during flight—
(A) Conducted by a person who holds a pilot certificate;
(B) Conducted in an aircraft;
(C) That includes a landing at a point other than the point of departure; and
(D) That involves the use of dead reckoning, pilotage, electronic navigation aids, radio aids, or other navigation systems to navigate to the landing point


Suppose I do a cross country with a student before they have their medical.

Does that mean that they can't log it as xc?

It's a reach, I know.



Other weird FAR question:

PVT pilot, no instrument rating.

Flying over Lake Erie at night under low overcast with 5 mi vis.

Legal, right? Absolutely NO outside references available.
Pilot must use instruments to maintain control.
Can he log actual?
I'm gonna take a stab at this....

Imagonnasay the student can log it...

and yes...he can log actual...He was controlling the aircraft by sole reference to instruments. He has to log actual...doesn't he? I didn't think the regs gave you a choice on the logging thing...
 
I'm not sure myself. I DO know that actual logged in the logbook of a noninstrument rated pilot would look mighty funny.

This is one of those argue-over-beer questions.

I'd LOVE to corner the FAA legal department and make 'em answer, though.
 
100LL... Again! said:
I'm not sure myself. I DO know that actual logged in the logbook of a noninstrument rated pilot would look mighty funny.

This is one of those argue-over-beer questions.

I'd LOVE to corner the FAA legal department and make 'em answer, though.
Completely agree...you've got only a PPL and you're logging actual...I'd say you're getting busted if someone (like the DPE at your instrument checkride) finds out...

I'll drink, but you're buying....I'm cheap, poor, and my wife just bought a rug for our bedroom for $200...

-mini
 
Can't you log the time as instrument due to a legal ruling by the FAA about flying over water on a moonless night? Or is that just an example, and not an actual case?
 
I think you have to log it as actual any time you're flying with "sole reference to instruments".

This came up on another website and that was the "ruling" there too. Not sure if its right or not, but enough people seemed to think so.

"Final Answer!" :p
 
Logging Instrument Time

I always like to show guys this when the discussion comes up ref: Actual or Simulated.

PT 61.51 Pilot Logbooks
(g) Logging instrument flight time.

No where does it say Actual or Simulated/Hood.

It is all instrument time when it meets the requirements of this section.

I would recommend it be logged as Simulated/Hood time when it is done for training and requirements for a rating but other than that, it is instrument time.
 
100LL... Again! said:
I'm not sure myself. I DO know that actual logged in the logbook of a noninstrument rated pilot would look mighty funny.

This is one of those argue-over-beer questions.

I'd LOVE to corner the FAA legal department and make 'em answer, though.
They did. But it was pretty recent. Ever notice that 90% of those logging issues that folks argue about over beer and in online forums were settled more than 20 years ago?

In the first one, the non-instrument rated pilot get to <gasp!> log =PIC= time in instrument condiditons.

==============================
OCT. 28, 1980

WINSTON SCOTT JONES

Dear Mr. Jones:

This is in response to your letter in which you request an interpretation of Section 61.51(2)(c) of the Federal Aviation Regulations, regarding logging of pilot-in-command (PIC) flight time.

Specifically, you ask what time may be logged as PIC time when the pilot in the right seat is a certificated flight instructor (CFI) along for the purpose of instruction and is not a required crewmember, and the pilot in the left seat holds either a private or commercial certificate in an aircraft for which he is rated.

Section 61.51 is a flight-time logging regulation, under which PIC time may be logged by one who is not actually the pilot in command (i.e., not "ultimately" responsible for the aircraft) during that time. This is consistent with the purpose of Section 61.51, which as stated in 61.51(a) is to record aeronautical training and experience used to meet the requirements for a certificate or rating, or the recent flight experience requirements of Section 61.

Section 61.51(c)(2)(i) provides that a private or commercial pilot may log as pilot-in-command time only that flight time during which the pilot--

1. Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he is rated; or

2. Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or

3. Acts as pilot-in-command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft, or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.

Under Section 61.51(c)(2)(iii) a certificated flight instructor may log as pilot-in-command time all flight time during which he or she acts as a flight instructor. Sections 61.51(b)(2)(iii) and (iv) provide for logging of flight instruction and instrument flight instruction received.

Accordingly, two or more pilots may each log PIC time for the same flight time. For example, a pilot who is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he or she is rated may log that time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(i) while receiving instruction, and the instructor may log that same time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(iii).

[snip]

You request interpretations of these regulations for situations in which:

[snip]

3. The purpose of the flight is instrument instruction actual IFR conditions.
4. The pilot in the left seat is not current in the aircraft or in the conditions of flight.

[snip]

In each situation, the CFI may log PIC time for all flight time during which she or he acts as flight instructor. The pilot receiving instruction may also log PIC time in each of these situations, as the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which she or he is rated. Specifically, neither the currency requirements of situation 4 nor the log book endorsement of situation 6 are ratings within the meaning of Section 61.51. "Rating" as used in that section refers to the rating in categories, classes, and types, as listed in Section 61.5, which are placed on pilot certificates.

We trust that this discussion answers your questions.

Sincerely,

EDWARD P. FABERMAN
Acting Assistant Chief Counsel
Regulations and Enforcement Division
==============================

And here's the famous "moonless night" opinion, in which, having determined that the condiions reqtured him to to maneuver solely by reference to instruments, the VFR pilot =had to= tog it that way. Also "brand new".

==============================
November 7, 1984
Mr. Joseph P. Carr

Dear Mr. Carr:

This is in response to your letter asking questions about instrument flight time.

First, you ask for an interpretation of Section 61.51(c)(4) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) regarding the logging of instrument flight time. You ask whether, for instance, a flight over the ocean on a moonless night without a discernible horizon could be logged as actual instrument flight time.

[unrelated portion snipped]

As you know, Section 61.51(c)(4) provides rules for the logging of instrument flight time which may be used to meet the requirements of a certificate or rating, or to meet the recent flight experience requirements of Part 61. That section provides in part, that a pilot may log as instrument flight time only that time during which he or she operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments, under actual (instrument meteorological conditions (imc)) or simulated instrument flight conditions. "Simulated" instrument conditions occur when the pilot's vision outside of the aircraft is intentionally restricted, such as by a hood or goggles. "Actual" instrument flight conditions occur when some outside conditions make it necessary for the pilot to use the aircraft instruments in order to maintain adequate control over the aircraft. Typically, these conditions involve adverse weather conditions.

To answer your first question, actual instrument conditions may occur in the case you described a moonless night over the ocean with no discernible horizon, if use of the instruments is necessary to maintain adequate control over the aircraft. The determination as to whether flight by reference to instruments is necessary is somewhat subjective and based in part on the sound judgment of the pilot. Note that, under Section 61.51(b)(3), the pilot must log the conditions of the flight. The log should include the reasons for determining that the flight was under actual instrument conditions in case the pilot later would be called on to prove that the actual instrument flight time logged was legitimate.

[unrelated portion snipped]

Sincerely,
/s/
John H. Cassady
Assistant Chief counsel
Regulations and Enforcement Division
==============================

When you log the time as the rules clearly tell you to, it never looks funny except to people who think funny.
 
On the 100 mile night x/c: Just a little tip: The definition of x/c for pvt and commercial certificates is: FAR 61.1 (b) (3)((ii)(B)Includes a point of landing that is at least a straight-line distance of MORE(emphasis added)MORE THAN 50 nautical miles from the original departure point.

and, yes you can do a straight line distance of OVER 100 nm one-way, at least 101 nm. But if you are going out-and-back, it would have to be at least 51 nm each way. Don't get caught in that crack.
 
For the night x-c, if we choose to go to two other airports (other than departure airport), does the first airport have to be at least 50 nm straight-line distance from the original point of departure or can the second airport meet the x-c requirement if it is at least 50 nm?
 
Yep, you can make as many landings as you want as long as the flight..."includes a point of landing that is a straight-line distance of MORE THAN 50 nm from the original departure point." and for the night x/c totals to MORE THAN 100 nm.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top