Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Need Quick Help: PPL X-Country Question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Logging Instrument Time

I always like to show guys this when the discussion comes up ref: Actual or Simulated.

PT 61.51 Pilot Logbooks
(g) Logging instrument flight time.

No where does it say Actual or Simulated/Hood.

It is all instrument time when it meets the requirements of this section.

I would recommend it be logged as Simulated/Hood time when it is done for training and requirements for a rating but other than that, it is instrument time.
 
100LL... Again! said:
I'm not sure myself. I DO know that actual logged in the logbook of a noninstrument rated pilot would look mighty funny.

This is one of those argue-over-beer questions.

I'd LOVE to corner the FAA legal department and make 'em answer, though.
They did. But it was pretty recent. Ever notice that 90% of those logging issues that folks argue about over beer and in online forums were settled more than 20 years ago?

In the first one, the non-instrument rated pilot get to <gasp!> log =PIC= time in instrument condiditons.

==============================
OCT. 28, 1980

WINSTON SCOTT JONES

Dear Mr. Jones:

This is in response to your letter in which you request an interpretation of Section 61.51(2)(c) of the Federal Aviation Regulations, regarding logging of pilot-in-command (PIC) flight time.

Specifically, you ask what time may be logged as PIC time when the pilot in the right seat is a certificated flight instructor (CFI) along for the purpose of instruction and is not a required crewmember, and the pilot in the left seat holds either a private or commercial certificate in an aircraft for which he is rated.

Section 61.51 is a flight-time logging regulation, under which PIC time may be logged by one who is not actually the pilot in command (i.e., not "ultimately" responsible for the aircraft) during that time. This is consistent with the purpose of Section 61.51, which as stated in 61.51(a) is to record aeronautical training and experience used to meet the requirements for a certificate or rating, or the recent flight experience requirements of Section 61.

Section 61.51(c)(2)(i) provides that a private or commercial pilot may log as pilot-in-command time only that flight time during which the pilot--

1. Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he is rated; or

2. Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or

3. Acts as pilot-in-command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft, or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.

Under Section 61.51(c)(2)(iii) a certificated flight instructor may log as pilot-in-command time all flight time during which he or she acts as a flight instructor. Sections 61.51(b)(2)(iii) and (iv) provide for logging of flight instruction and instrument flight instruction received.

Accordingly, two or more pilots may each log PIC time for the same flight time. For example, a pilot who is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he or she is rated may log that time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(i) while receiving instruction, and the instructor may log that same time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(iii).

[snip]

You request interpretations of these regulations for situations in which:

[snip]

3. The purpose of the flight is instrument instruction actual IFR conditions.
4. The pilot in the left seat is not current in the aircraft or in the conditions of flight.

[snip]

In each situation, the CFI may log PIC time for all flight time during which she or he acts as flight instructor. The pilot receiving instruction may also log PIC time in each of these situations, as the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which she or he is rated. Specifically, neither the currency requirements of situation 4 nor the log book endorsement of situation 6 are ratings within the meaning of Section 61.51. "Rating" as used in that section refers to the rating in categories, classes, and types, as listed in Section 61.5, which are placed on pilot certificates.

We trust that this discussion answers your questions.

Sincerely,

EDWARD P. FABERMAN
Acting Assistant Chief Counsel
Regulations and Enforcement Division
==============================

And here's the famous "moonless night" opinion, in which, having determined that the condiions reqtured him to to maneuver solely by reference to instruments, the VFR pilot =had to= tog it that way. Also "brand new".

==============================
November 7, 1984
Mr. Joseph P. Carr

Dear Mr. Carr:

This is in response to your letter asking questions about instrument flight time.

First, you ask for an interpretation of Section 61.51(c)(4) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) regarding the logging of instrument flight time. You ask whether, for instance, a flight over the ocean on a moonless night without a discernible horizon could be logged as actual instrument flight time.

[unrelated portion snipped]

As you know, Section 61.51(c)(4) provides rules for the logging of instrument flight time which may be used to meet the requirements of a certificate or rating, or to meet the recent flight experience requirements of Part 61. That section provides in part, that a pilot may log as instrument flight time only that time during which he or she operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments, under actual (instrument meteorological conditions (imc)) or simulated instrument flight conditions. "Simulated" instrument conditions occur when the pilot's vision outside of the aircraft is intentionally restricted, such as by a hood or goggles. "Actual" instrument flight conditions occur when some outside conditions make it necessary for the pilot to use the aircraft instruments in order to maintain adequate control over the aircraft. Typically, these conditions involve adverse weather conditions.

To answer your first question, actual instrument conditions may occur in the case you described a moonless night over the ocean with no discernible horizon, if use of the instruments is necessary to maintain adequate control over the aircraft. The determination as to whether flight by reference to instruments is necessary is somewhat subjective and based in part on the sound judgment of the pilot. Note that, under Section 61.51(b)(3), the pilot must log the conditions of the flight. The log should include the reasons for determining that the flight was under actual instrument conditions in case the pilot later would be called on to prove that the actual instrument flight time logged was legitimate.

[unrelated portion snipped]

Sincerely,
/s/
John H. Cassady
Assistant Chief counsel
Regulations and Enforcement Division
==============================

When you log the time as the rules clearly tell you to, it never looks funny except to people who think funny.
 
On the 100 mile night x/c: Just a little tip: The definition of x/c for pvt and commercial certificates is: FAR 61.1 (b) (3)((ii)(B)Includes a point of landing that is at least a straight-line distance of MORE(emphasis added)MORE THAN 50 nautical miles from the original departure point.

and, yes you can do a straight line distance of OVER 100 nm one-way, at least 101 nm. But if you are going out-and-back, it would have to be at least 51 nm each way. Don't get caught in that crack.
 
For the night x-c, if we choose to go to two other airports (other than departure airport), does the first airport have to be at least 50 nm straight-line distance from the original point of departure or can the second airport meet the x-c requirement if it is at least 50 nm?
 
Yep, you can make as many landings as you want as long as the flight..."includes a point of landing that is a straight-line distance of MORE THAN 50 nm from the original departure point." and for the night x/c totals to MORE THAN 100 nm.
 
So I can go out to California, fly over the sea at night and log all sorts of Actual in non-icing conditions. I like it!
 
Last edited:
JRSLim said:
So I can go out to California, fly over the sea at night and log all sorts of Actual in non-icing conditions. I like it!
Id think so...as long as its flight by "sole reference to instruments" and you're not under the hood...

-mini
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom