NDB approaches???

RM7599

Active member
Joined
Mar 11, 2002
Posts
32
Total Time
N/a
I have not started my instrument training yet but it seems that a lot of people hate, or have trouble with NDB approaches. Why is this? What makes them so difficult?..............and if you are really motivated, maybe you could tell me how to perform one???
 

jaybird

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
523
Total Time
3.0+
NDB approaches are not hard at all if you understand them. Just remember the needle always points to the station. Instead of trying to figure out MH, MB, and RB, just superimpose the needle on your HI and take the heading off that.
 

ksu_aviator

GO CATS
Joined
Dec 1, 2001
Posts
1,327
Total Time
4100
I think the reason most people hate them is because you have to think a lot more. Also, you don't have the same assurances that you are on the correct course like you do with an ILS and we rarely ever do an NDB approach. You'll also start to see many of the uncontrolled fields at smaller airports replace thier NDB's with GPS approaches simply because of the economics. There is very little cost in maintaining a GPS approach versus maintaining and NDB.

I'm not going to tell you everything you need to know about doing an approach, but here are some of my hints.

When tracking an NDB that is either a fixed card or movable card (not slaved) its easier to use your minds eye to super impose the NDB needle on the HSI then it is to do the math. Where ever the needle is pointing is your inbound bearing, and where the tail is pointing is your outbound bearing.

If the NDB is off of the field (i.e. LOM) when you hit the LOM/NDB, just fly the inbound heading. If you do that, you'll probably be pretty close. When you consider the reliability of any individual NDB you'll see that this method is almost as good as trying to track an NDB needle (many of which jump irratically). Also, estimate your winddrift prior to crossing the NDB, this will keep you from having to bracket inside the FAF. None of this should be substituted totally for actually tracking the proper course, but it does help you stay near the course so you don't have to make big corrections.

If the NDB is on the field your job just got a whole lot easier, as long as keep the need straight ahead, your probably going to end up close to the runway. Again, not to be substituted for a good track, but you can eliminate large corrections. Do remember if you have a stiff crosswind you'll come into the NDB straight into the wind.

The above is by no means a complete guide to NDB's, I was just trying to illustrate how you can take some of the thinking out of the approach. The biggest key is to pretend the NDB needle is on your HSI, that will take so much work out of the approach.

I forgot to ad that you should be very sure your HSI is very accurately set prior to beginning an approach. That can be a very big problem if you have flown a couple of hours and then begin the approach with out resetting it.
 

bobbysamd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
5,710
Total Time
4565
NDB work

It helps greatly to start by orienting yourself to the station. Tune and ident the station and leave the volume up to monitor the Morse code ident. Parallel yourself with the desired MB. The needle on the ADF always points to the station. If the needle is pointing forward and directly to the station, you are on the bearing. If the needle is pointing to the station but to either side, the station is in front of you and you are either left or right of course. You can intercept the MB inbound by taking a good intercept angle, something like thirty degrees. As an example, let's say you determined that the station is to your left and ahead of you. Turn left on your 30-degree intercept. Hold your intercept angle well and watch the head of the ADF needle. Watch it open up on the right side of the scale. Once the head of the needle opens on the right side of its scale by a number of degrees equal to your intercept angle, in our case, thirty degrees, you've intercepted the bearing inbound. Turn to the course. The head of the ADF needle should be pointing to zero on the card (fixed card).

Outbound tracking is similar. Determine your position relative to the station. Once again, you can always count on the ADF needle pointing to the station. The needle will point to the aft of the scale, which means the station is behind you. Take a good intercept angle and watch the tail of the ADF needle's progress on the upper left or right quadrant of the ADF card, as the case may be. At the point the tail of the needle closes to the number of degrees equal to your intercept angle, you've intercepted the course. Turn to the course. The tail of the ADF needle should be pointing to zero on the ADF card (fixed card) and the head of the needle should be pointing at 180.

At that point, hold heading and watch the ADF needle for drift. If the head or tail as the case may be drifts off zero, you have a crosswind. Take intercept angles again to get back on course but roll out on a heading that keeps the needle from drifting. Probably you'll have to bracket your wind correction angle a couple of times to hold your course.

Common errors include overshooting or undershooting the bearing, and not turning and identifying the station.

Do follow the excellent suggestions above about mentally superimposing the ADF needle on your HI. Of course, if you have an airplane with RMI, you're set.

It is absolutely vital to TUNE and IDENTIFY the station with the Morse code. Leave the volume of the ADF up. If you don't hear the Morse code ident, you cannot rely on the station for navigation.

Good luck with your instrument training.
 
Last edited:

newmei

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
181
Total Time
2900
As the previous poster mentioned it is paramount that you tune ident. and MONITOR the station. There is no TO/FROM OFF flags. So if you don't have a morse in the background how do you know your following a station. Some ADFs do 360s when looking for stations but its been my experience that some just stay put when they are not working or receiving, WHICH IS NOT GOOD!!!!
I would never base a decision to go ifr to a field that only has a NDB and if I did I'd make sure a airport was close by with a ILS or VOR. I would probably not have a alterate with a NDB only approach unless that airport was VFR. Just personal opinons on the last half.
 

newmei

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
181
Total Time
2900
One more thing...Even if your plane does'nt have a ADF it is a good idea to receive training with them. It is my understanding that the FAA is removing from service when they break instead of fixing them. However, there is actually a airway using ADFs in florida which goes from the southend to Marathon. Also the Bahamas has a few ADF airways and they can be common in Central America. Tegucegalpa (sp?) in Honduras has a approach that uses them. Only problem is it requires dual NDB radios and it requires something like 1300 per nm descent rate if you don't spot the runway till the MAP. LOL Just a little tidbit.
 

gundriver

Active member
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Posts
41
Total Time
< Most
Remember this little phrase and it will make life easier for you. "Push the head" "Pull the Tail". For example; If you're tracking a course to the station of say 360 degrees and the head of the needle is pointing 355. You must "push" the needle back to 360 by pointing your nose somewhere left of 355..(how far depends on winds and airspeed) If on the other hand you are tracking the 180 bearing outbound the opposite is true.. For example; The tail of the needle is pointing to 175, you want to "pull" the tail around to 180. To do this you would steer to somewhere opposite of 180, say 185 to pull the needle back to the desired bearing. (Once again the amount depends on airspeed and windspeed/direction). Remember as a rule of thumb, if it took 10 degrees to get you back on course/bearing, reduce that number by half to start bracketing a good tracking heading.
 

Vik

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Posts
913
Total Time
69
I just got my instrument in Oct of 2001.

If I could have done the rating without NDB approaches I would have saved a month and tons of money. The approaches were painful to begin because you have to do a little more thinking. However, with a little practice with MS FltSim, and advice from a couple of airline pilots, I mastered the approach. I was feeling great until the next stage of my rating which involved doing all the approaches PARTIAL PANEL.

After a week of blood, sweat and tears of trying to perform the NDB approach partial panel, I found out from the examiner that a partial panel NDB will not be on the exam, maybe just a regular NDB approach.

I learned the TDI/DHI method. Tail Desired Intercept and Desired Head Intercept. PM me or email me when you get to NDB approaches. I am too tired to explain TDI/DHI right now. =) They teach this method at Embry Riddle too I believe so if you can find an ERAU grad, ask'em.

Two pieces of advice:

1) Use a flight sim program at home to do them over and over and over. PAUSE the game and think. You'll get faster each time.
2) Don't be afraid to ask for 'delay vectors' to get absolutely 100% ready to do the approach. The most demanding NDB approach I ever did was into Long Beach. The reason was because of time and I'd mess it up each time b/c I was way behind the aircraft. I would take off from John Wayne Airport (SNA) and get the NDB approach into LGB. The entire flight wasn't more than 10 minutes so basically I took off, switched radios to departures, asked to go off frequency to get the LGB ATIS, came back, immediately got my turn to intercept, which came in after just a minute or so, etc. My chief pilot said, 'ask for delay vectors' and I did and she was 100% correct. It fixed my approaches because I could concentrate on the approach w/o having to brief the approach, do BCGUMPLES.

Anyhow, I think you'll enjoy your IFR rating after you've finished. Lastly, don't quit no matter what. There is a ton of knowledge involved, learn it well so you don't get yourself killed.
 

pilotyip

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
13,629
Total Time
14000
PC

If you are going to fly inst you need a good PC based Sim, there are many good ones out there, get one if you don't have one. Then just keep shooting NDB approaches until you master them.
Also remember with a Fed riding with you keep the station ID in your audio, thats the way you make sure the station is working.
 

norskman2

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
Posts
571
Total Time
320
The PC-based IFR trainers/simulators is a WHOOOOOLE 'nother matter. There are many pros and cons to using them.

Pros - You can practice your %^!@ off with no plane/instructor expense, and shoot 4 approaches in an hour

Cons - The simulator does NOT replace the instructor, doesn't provide much feedback, and teaches you ONE way to do a maneuver not necessarily the way your instructor or examiner might want to do it.

Nonetheless, I think they can be a valuable supplement to your training. PM me and I can see lots of info on the different programs that are out there.

Then again, there's time in Frasca-type simulators too, which cost money, but is done under an instructors' supervision.
 

norskman2

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
Posts
571
Total Time
320
oops. I meant I can SEND you detailed info on the various different IFR sim programs.
 

bobbysamd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
5,710
Total Time
4565
Book recommendation

Get a copy of IFR Principles and Practices: A Guide to Safe Instrument Flying by Avram Goldstein, ISBN: 0934754047. This book costs only $11 on bn.com. It's a great little book on instrument flying, and has an excellent, understandable discussion on NDB work.
 

prodigal

Fiduciary responsibility?
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
285
Total Time
5-6K
NDB's are fun

We recently replaced the ADF in our BE95 with a brand spanking new Garmin GPS. I truly love the GPS but I also miss the ole ADF.
Besides approaches, it's a great tool for general situational awareness, and I can't listen to Rush on the GPS. :)
 

avbug

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Posts
7,602
Total Time
n/a
I have never used formulas for flying NDB approaches, and I've never taught them, either. Keep the pointy thing at the top of the dial most of the time, and make all the intercepts at 45 degrees, and the rest works out. The ADF is dirt simple, and really quite reliable. There is no sense making it any more complicated than it need be, and it needn't be.
 

prodigal

Fiduciary responsibility?
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
285
Total Time
5-6K
RB+MH=MB

I agree with avbug . . . all that mental masturbation is fine for the written, but fuggittaboutit in the plane. Just keep the needle pointed in the right direction for the phase of the approach.
Really simple.
 

Timebuilder

Entrepreneur
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
4,625
Total Time
1634
Books are a good place for any instrument student to spend time. Trevor Thom (The Pilot's Manual, #3), Peter Dogan's The Instrument Flight Training Manual (he came up with the Professional Instrument Course) and folks like Richard Collins and Richard Taylor are all good bets. I think Trevor Thom explains the NDB as well as anyone.

One tip I have for you is to DRAW THE PROCEDURES on paper at home, and on the whiteboard at the flight school. Since you are doing more of the "work" to use the NDB, you need to clearly visualize what is going on. With a little practice you will begin to associate what you see on the panel with what you drew on the paper. That's the beginning of Situational Awareness. You're setting up neural pathways in the brain to combine information about the direction of the plane's nose and the angle from the plane to the station. When you have done enough of this, it starts to become a "flow experience", where you act smoothly and naturally, as opposed to intellectualizing every step as you struggle along.

One more thing: the key to intercepting an NDB course line is to recognize that the course line has an associated heading, and the angle of interception of that course line is the same angle as the angle between the nose and the station when interception happens, with no wind. For example, let's say you are on a heading of 045, and you want to intercept a course line that represents a heading of 360 to the station, meaning you are going to intercept the line while south of the station, join the course and head north toward the station. Your angle of interception is the same 45 degrees as the heading you are flying, a common angle to use in a single engine airplane. How do you know when you have intercepted the course? The ADF will show that the station is to your left side, 45 degrees off your nose, and the ADF needle will be pointing to 315 on a fixed card, or 360 if you have set a moveable card to your heading of 045. Draw it out in several stages if you like. It's really the simplest geometry once you understand what is happening.
 

tarp

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Posts
539
Total Time
Lots
RM7599:

I don't think anybody answered your question, they just started teaching.

The reason NDB approaches are hated is because pilots forget they are flying airplanes in a body of air that is usually moving. By that I mean its a rare day when you have calm winds in the strata of altitudes that you would be flying the approach.

Because the ADF installed in the plane is a "dumb" instrument (only points to the station) it requires your discipline to fly an approach path accurately. Think about it in VFR terms. If it was a calm day and you had to fly down final to a landing, its a piece of cake, right? But if you add a 12 knot direct crosswind, it becomes a job for you to hold the centerline. The same thing occurs on the NDB approach but without any visual cues. You must "crab" into the wind to hold a course line, but you determine the amount of "crab" not by looking outside at a big old runway or mountain but by comparing the values on the DG and the ADF head.

This requires all those concepts the guys were teaching above. I personally love the NDB approaches because it teaches a pilot to respect and calculate the winds. Anybody can fly a VOR or ILS approach where the "needle" is the course line - only real pilots can draw the line in their head and force the plane to fly a path with precision even when no precision instruments are in the plane. Food for thought!
 

avbug

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Posts
7,602
Total Time
n/a
I think we answered his question just fine. The reason pilots hate NDB's is that they make it too complicated, and don't understand the most basic of navigational instruments. Pilots seldom fly the NDB; they're used to flying an ILS and anything else causes sweat to bead.

The point of the previous posts was simply that the NDB isn't a nightmare; it's user friendly, reliable, and proven (and the only thing going in many locals, GPS excepted; even GPS has it's limitations).

The origional poster asked why people hate NDB's (some do, some don't), what makes them so complicated (they aren't; pilots complicate the issues themselves), and how it works (asked, and answered). Sounds to me like everyone answered the topic thoroughly.
 

Goffer

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2002
Posts
127
Total Time
4000
It has been said the NDB will be phased out for quite some time now. On a windy day it might be hard to find a better way to practice tracking than with an good old NDB.
 
Top