Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

More pressure on Comair....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
>Where are your facts? What are you bringing to the table? How can you refute these "opinions"?

well, how about this. CMR made $20-something million in the second quarter according to the DOT numbers, right? sure, those numbers come from the DOT and aren't internal Delta numbers, but until Delta gives up that info (perhaps in bankruptcy, but still they'll show whatever Delta wants them to show), that's all anybody has.

So, how did Mesa, CHQ, Skywest and all the rest do? any other regionals making $20 million a quarter?
 
chperplt said:
I remember reading something last year about ACA. It said their contract with United gave them break even plus a 50% profit. Do you think Comair was paid cost plus 50% before 9/11??
This isn't even remotely close to being accurate. Most "cost plus" deals are in the cost plus 10% range.

Sam
 
This isn't even remotely close to being accurate. Most "cost plus" deals are in the cost plus 10% range.

Sam
I didn't say it was exact. I'll try and find the article.. It was about ACA not wanting to cut their lucrative deal with UAL and decided to start I-Air..
 
chperplt said:
I didn't say it was exact. I'll try and find the article.. It was about ACA not wanting to cut their lucrative deal with UAL and decided to start I-Air..
Any "airline" that can make a guaranteed operating margin (even 7-12%) is operating under a "lucrative" situation.

Sam
 
Chperplt,


I think Onyoursix has a lot of valid points, and he is not even a member of DL or DCI. He can see thru this morass and see that Delta wants less pay for growth. Delta has a lot to choose from, and they will grow WHO THEY WANT TO DEPENDING ON WHAT IS GIVEN UP. That is unfortunately the game now. The article brought up a lot of "opinions" that we mainliners have been saying all along, and that is IT IS POSSIBLE FOR DELTA TO ALLOW THE BOOKS TO APPEAR IN A WAY TO MAKE COMAIR OR ASA LOOK PROFITABLE. When we said stuff like that before, we were slammed and told by many of you that we were WRONG. Well, it looks like many other people have the same OPINION. We are ALL going to take pay cuts eventually. I don't mind Onyoursix's opinion, he seems to be able to see this whole mess without haveing a DL/DCI conflict.


WMS,

You say ASA has the cheapest 50 seat rate going for DCI, but for the 70 seat rate--Skywest has the cheapest (even though Skywest isn't allowed to fly 70 seaters for us) because they fly them at 50 seat rates. If Dalpa allows more 70 seaters and Delta can find some at Skywest, would ASA guys be willing to match Skywest's 70 seat rates? The downward spiral continues---and we will all lose......


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Delta has a lot to choose from, and they will grow WHO THEY WANT TO DEPENDING ON WHAT IS GIVEN UP
General,

You are absolutely correct. Delta does have a lot to chose from, and they will grow who they want to grow.

My point is simply that pilot cost is not the only factor in who is, or isn't the cheapest. In addition, neither you, I, or OY6 has any idea what any DCI carrier is paid. You cannot say that CHQ or SkYW is a cheaper option than Comair or ASA. Does DAL pay for aircraft leases or fuel costs for CHQ or SKYW?? What about maintenance or catering?? All these things go into cost and none of us has that information.

Almost every article quoted here is basing their opinion solely on pilot cost. You've said it yourself General.. Pilot costs are not the only issue at play. It's not even the biggest issue.

Until and unless any of us get to see what DAL is really paying each DCI carrier no one can say that Comair has the highest costs.

Oh.. and I've never disputed the fact that we are or aren't profitable on paper, and paper alone.
 
Chperplt,


I agree with you. I do. You are right that we do not know all of the costs involved. But, when it comes to pilot costs, we do know that Skywest lowballed everyone with their "fly 70 seaters for 50 seat pay" deal. Will that fact sway Delta to go for an all Skywest 70 seater program? Probably not. But, it will play into future negotiations with ASA and probably Comair. Delta is looking for cuts everywhere, and I don't blame them. Remember, I also know that I will probably get a 35% pay cut soon, but I also know that we are now getting paid above the competition. Will the Comair pilots see that too? I don't want the first year guy who can't pay the bills getting a pay cut----I don't. But, DL management will go after everyone, or they may not grow. That will turn morale into mush.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Don't Forget Jetblue E190 Rates - Very Low Benchmark...

General Lee said:
Chperplt,


I agree with you. I do. You are right that we do not know all of the costs involved. But, when it comes to pilot costs, we do know that Skywest lowballed everyone with their "fly 70 seaters for 50 seat pay" deal. Will that fact sway Delta to go for an all Skywest 70 seater program? Probably not. But, it will play into future negotiations with ASA and probably Comair. Delta is looking for cuts everywhere, and I don't blame them. Remember, I also know that I will probably get a 35% pay cut soon, but I also know that we are now getting paid above the competition. Will the Comair pilots see that too? I don't want the first year guy who can't pay the bills getting a pay cut----I don't. But, DL management will go after everyone, or they may not grow. That will turn morale into mush.


Bye Bye--General Lee
Good post. I agree that a lot of new agreements have really placed pressure on Comair and other "relatively" high-paying regionals. JetBlue's wage for the E190 has set a new low-bar for the 70-100 seat range ($37/hr. for the FO and very low Capt. pay on that aircraft) and that could have an adverse impact on Comair's/ASA's negotiations when crunch time arrives.

It may be difficult for the Comair/ASA guys to justify their pay rates on both the 50-seat CRJ-200 and the CRJ-700 when they are higher (for the senior guys) than JetBlue E190 pay for the same positions... In fact, all regional rates could be negatively impacted... Let's not forget how JetBlue has screwed the pay scale for the 70-100 seat market by setting a low benchmark and now you guys at Comair/ASA may pay the price. You can bet that DAL management will make that comparison in an attempt to rationalize pay cuts on aircraft with fewer total seats... Realistically, how can a senior Comair/ASA Captain on a 50-seat CRJ justify his higher pay rate than that of a Captain on a Jetblue E190 which has 50+ more seats in this low-cost environment?

JetBlue has basically screwed the pay scale for all regional pilots (including those at Comair/ASA) by creating such a low benchmark for the E190...
 
Last edited:
You say ASA has the cheapest 50 seat rate going for DCI, but for the 70 seat rate--Skywest has the cheapest (even though Skywest isn't allowed to fly 70 seaters for us) because they fly them at 50 seat rates. If Dalpa allows more 70 seaters and Delta can find some at Skywest, would ASA guys be willing to match Skywest's 70 seat rates? The downward spiral continues---and we will all lose......

I agree that we cannot compete with a company that will low-ball and fly 70s for 50 seat rates. So far it's not an issue since scope will be met at the end of the year and contract carriers can't fly 70s.

If DALPA gives in on scope and worse yet allows contract carrier to fly 70s, then I bet ASA's life in SLC would be over. We wouldn't be there at all if SKW could fly 70s for DAL.

We would not give in to fly more 70s. We didn't give in for the RFP airplanes and haven't given in on the contract, and I'm sure the same would hold true for more 70s.
 
Heavy Set said:
Good post. I agree that a lot of new agreements have really placed pressure on Comair and other "relatively" high-paying regionals. JetBlue's wage for the E190 has set a new low-bar for the 70-100 seat range ($37/hr. for the FO and very low Capt. pay on that aircraft) and that could have an adverse impact on Comair's/ASA's negotiations when crunch time arrives.

It may be difficult for the Comair/ASA guys to justify their pay rates on both the 50-seat CRJ-200 and the CRJ-700 when they are higher (for the senior guys) than JetBlue E190 pay for the same positions... In fact, all regional rates could be negatively impacted... Let's not forget how JetBlue has screwed the pay scale for the 70-100 seat market by setting a low benchmark and now you guys at Comair/ASA may pay the price. You can bet that DAL management will make that comparison in an attempt to rationalize pay cuts on aircraft with fewer total seats... Realistically, how can a senior Comair/ASA Captain on a 50-seat CRJ justify his higher pay rate than that of a Captain on a Jetblue E190 which has 50+ more seats in this low-cost environment?

JetBlue has basically screwed the pay scale for all regional pilots (including those at Comair/ASA) by creating such a low benchmark for the E190...
Good point. JetBlue's E190 wage rates might hurt all regional pilot wages - I guess it might be difficult to justify a high 50-seat wage when JetBlue's pilots are earning less on a 100 seater... Thanks Dave Neelman (sp?) for screwing the industry!
 
Airpiraterob said:
i agree. they are a tad $$. and thats whats making people think about whats next.

delta pays X$ per hour flown.
the industry sinks and costs of operating go way up.
delta still pays you the same X$ per hour you fly.
you dont feel the sting of hte industry because your costs never changed apart for gas....mabye...unless delta picks that up too.
so now delta is paying you the same money it did before...but its not helping their situation. so you may be making a profit....but theyre not as a result.
the person who payed you X$ per hour can no longer afford to pay that. they are running out of money to pay you.

whats the answer to that? if they cant pay what you ask.....what will you do next?

say your hardware store makes X-ammount, but the guy who you rent the building from wants rent in excess of what youre making (cites the cost of keeping that building running skyrocketed)....what do you do?..now ad the fact that the guy wanting the rent is the partent of your hardware company....now what does HE do? and what do YOU do?
Well, DAL can have 100% of 23 million or 14% of 23 million. Huh, looks to me like for them to do better with a contract carrier that contract carrier would have to make 165 million a quarter. Anybody do that lately, even with working for free nobody has done that. I don't know what JC was talking about when he said other carriers were getting contracts as good, hopefully CO-ex and ASA. You can bet he will be asked to explain that one.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top