Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mesa now bunks together on cont duty

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"ROTFLMAO" as in "Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off"
????
I don't quite understand why this is a laughing matter to you. Your company only provides a single room for the entire crew on short CDO breaks and this has you laughing why???

And what floor are you rolling on, is it the cabin floor?

I was laughing at what appeared to be some clown quoting the mesa contract... as though it has any meaning over there. Looks like it was actually the QX contract though.

And I don't work at mesa anymore, but thanks anyway.
 
Last edited:
I'm not talking about night freight- that's a way of life and your schedule stays (roughly) the same. You fly at night and sleep during the day, like a 3rd shift employee.
I'm talking about you getting 3 hours of sleep overnight. But you can't magically will yourself to sleep before that in order to be properly rested- you probably woke up at 8 am or something like that. So, instead of getting a proper nights' rest, you get less than half that, then go fly an expensive plane with strangers entrusting you with their lives. That's why standups are bad.

I still don't see the problem. When I do CDOs, I do just as the cargo guys do: I sleep about 6 hours during the day in the crashpad and get a little nap in during the CDO layover in the hotel. As long as you are flying CDOs consistently and not jumping back and forth between day flying and night flying, then it shouldn't be a problem.
 
The only way the FAA will adjust rest requirements based on circadium rythym rather than a straight 16 hours duty is for there to be an accident attributed to fatigue and for the public to know about it.

The "Whitlow ruling" came out of the AA Little Rock accident where the NTSB found the long duty day as a causal factor. Consequently, the FAA finally "interpreted" an already clear cut law allowing no more than 16 hours of continuous duty. Before the accident, the airlines said this was 16 hours "scheduled" but it could be exceeded if it wasn't "scheduled." So delays of any kind could, and often did, take the pilot past 16 hours. Not a peep from the FAA until the Little Rock accident. Now, 16 hours is a drop dead time. You cannot operate beyond that.

While the NTSB hasn't released their report on this, if the NTSB finds that the Comair Flight 5191 accident of Aug. 27 in Lexington has as a causal factor fatigue caused by a continual disruption of circadium rythym, perhaps there may be some progress made on changing this outrageous assumption that 4 hours of sit time from noon to 4pm is the same as 4 hours of sit time from midnight to 4am.

It isn't. Everyone knows it isn't but it won't change until the outrage affects the stock value of a company. Then the CEOs will listen. Then the FAA will always do what is politically expedient when the pressure reaches the highest levels. Remember, bad people had been busting into cockpits for decades, but it wasn't until 9/11 that we got hardened doors.
 
As long as you are flying CDOs consistently and not jumping back and forth between day flying and night flying, then it shouldn't be a problem.

Unfortunately, not all carriers build CDO-only lines. With the regional I was at, there were usually a good number of regular lines each month in the bid packet with a CDO tacked on to the end of a trip. So in that case, one could go from flying days to a quick CDO or standup. And it was never fun or sometimes even possible to get much of a nap on the during the break period.
 
I still don't see the problem. When I do CDOs, I do just as the cargo guys do: I sleep about 6 hours during the day in the crashpad and get a little nap in during the CDO layover in the hotel. As long as you are flying CDOs consistently and not jumping back and forth between day flying and night flying, then it shouldn't be a problem.

I agree; CDO-only lines are relatively easy (unless weather or mechanical delays - normal at ASA). You just have to get on schedule and stay on it. For those on reserve or if you get stuck with one, then you have a greater challenge sleepwise. I have had to sleep on the airplane during a CDO, but normally that doesn't happen.
 
Unfortunately, not all carriers build CDO-only lines. With the regional I was at, there were usually a good number of regular lines each month in the bid packet with a CDO tacked on to the end of a trip. So in that case, one could go from flying days to a quick CDO or standup. And it was never fun or sometimes even possible to get much of a nap on the during the break period.

I agree that this is certainly a problem. Unfortunately, we do these mixed lines at PCL. I do them all the time, and they are certainly dangerous. That's why we're pushing for pure CDO lines in the next contract. We're sticking to that demand because we consider it a safety issue.
 
Who wants to bet Mesa pilots will see a rise in sexual harrassment lawsuits, divorce filings, pregnancies, and a push for the legalization of same-sex marriage?

Actually, considering the widespread industry attitude that flight attendants are "flying mattresses" (and kleenex-es), I'm pretty surprised there are A LOT more sexual harrassment lawsuits, divorce filings, and "pilot errors" already.

Guess the "no-morals, anything goes w/o consequences" youth of today pretty much works in the pilots favor.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top