Soverytired
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Posts
- 1,572
Not to beat a dead horse, but:
1. The 1 (ONE) hotel room "policy" shared by 4 mixed gender crewmembers has been in place for at least 4 months. It certainly pre-dated the TV story by at least 2 months.
2. The 1 (ONE) hotel room policy was driven by legal issues, not company concern for properly rested crews. Issues like:
News story didn't change squat. All (!) crews are still sleeping on the airplane, because nobody wants to share a hotel room with 3 strangers, and you get more rest sleeping on the plane anyway (at least 1.5 hrs more).
And really, with one bed, one desk chair, and one (sometimes) comfy chair, who wants to go play "musical chairs" (last one doesn't get a chair, remember) with a bunch of strangers anyway?
1. The 1 (ONE) hotel room "policy" shared by 4 mixed gender crewmembers has been in place for at least 4 months. It certainly pre-dated the TV story by at least 2 months.
2. The 1 (ONE) hotel room policy was driven by legal issues, not company concern for properly rested crews. Issues like:
- Continuous use APU noise complaints in smaller airports (ex: MRY)
- Unattended crews in a secure ramp area w/o proper SIDA badges (everywhere)
- The hotel room is really a "crew room" away from the airport
News story didn't change squat. All (!) crews are still sleeping on the airplane, because nobody wants to share a hotel room with 3 strangers, and you get more rest sleeping on the plane anyway (at least 1.5 hrs more).
And really, with one bed, one desk chair, and one (sometimes) comfy chair, who wants to go play "musical chairs" (last one doesn't get a chair, remember) with a bunch of strangers anyway?