Cappy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2001
- Posts
- 144
For all you Mesa pilots out there with a hardup to merge with ACA I can understand your reasoning:
1. Your contract sucks...no details required
2. You have no understanding as to how terrible your contract is.
3. You are tied to UAL, AWA, and USAir...nothing to be proud of.
4. General Lee is right...ALPA merger policy means DOH and a cursory review of your seniority list means ACA is far better off.
5. The regional aircraft bubble is preparing to pop.
Now, the technical aspects of the offer are different. The offer itself is VERY weak and pretty much a slap in the face from JO.
Consider that 85% of ACA stock is held by institutional investment firms. Let's see, there are two choices:
1. Allow Mesa to by ACA at a very undervalued price and take a one-time gain with VERY high risk OR...
2. Allow ACA management to procede with Goldilocks (LCC Code-name) and risk a long-term gain for the mutual funds that they invest for.
An investment banker I am friends with said it this way "Mesa is the Pinto and ACA is the Ferrari...combine them and you get...two Pintos!"
Our management has already spent many hours and many millions preparing for a UAL separation. It would be of no surprise to see a UAL fingerprint somewhere on this deal.
PLease do not take my comments as disrespectful. I simply want to make sure you understand that we are really two VERY different companies. Just because we both fly RJ's does not mean we are anything alike in spirit.
Chow
1. Your contract sucks...no details required
2. You have no understanding as to how terrible your contract is.
3. You are tied to UAL, AWA, and USAir...nothing to be proud of.
4. General Lee is right...ALPA merger policy means DOH and a cursory review of your seniority list means ACA is far better off.
5. The regional aircraft bubble is preparing to pop.
Now, the technical aspects of the offer are different. The offer itself is VERY weak and pretty much a slap in the face from JO.
Consider that 85% of ACA stock is held by institutional investment firms. Let's see, there are two choices:
1. Allow Mesa to by ACA at a very undervalued price and take a one-time gain with VERY high risk OR...
2. Allow ACA management to procede with Goldilocks (LCC Code-name) and risk a long-term gain for the mutual funds that they invest for.
An investment banker I am friends with said it this way "Mesa is the Pinto and ACA is the Ferrari...combine them and you get...two Pintos!"
Our management has already spent many hours and many millions preparing for a UAL separation. It would be of no surprise to see a UAL fingerprint somewhere on this deal.
PLease do not take my comments as disrespectful. I simply want to make sure you understand that we are really two VERY different companies. Just because we both fly RJ's does not mean we are anything alike in spirit.
Chow