Assets, whether owned or leased (which would be the case with banks on the registration), are required to be listed, along with the etimated value of that asset, on the company's proxy statements by the Securities and Exchange Commision, or SEC. Failure to comply with that requirement by knowingly witholding that type of information would result in civil and criminal charges being brought forth by the SEC and shareholders. Rest assured that a busines tool such as an aircraft cannot be legally hidden from shareholders of a publically traded company. The shareholders know about the aircraft if they just read the report, which they are required to be provided a copy of.
Take Lehman Brothers as an example. If they were trying to hide from shareholders, then why would they allow the tail # to end in LB on both aircraft? I'm sure they are using their current arrangement with the bank for tax and liability purposes as you mentioned previously. The only problem with this type of arrangement (Company A leasing an airplane from Bank A for the sole purpose of transporting employees of Company B, a subsidiary of Company A) is the fine line between 91 nad 135 operations, depending on how the jurisdictional FSDO views these types of arrangements
Take Lehman Brothers as an example. If they were trying to hide from shareholders, then why would they allow the tail # to end in LB on both aircraft? I'm sure they are using their current arrangement with the bank for tax and liability purposes as you mentioned previously. The only problem with this type of arrangement (Company A leasing an airplane from Bank A for the sole purpose of transporting employees of Company B, a subsidiary of Company A) is the fine line between 91 nad 135 operations, depending on how the jurisdictional FSDO views these types of arrangements
pilotmiketx said:Also, some public companies don't want shareholders knowing about their aircraft because they may be viewed as frivolous luxuries.