volunteer
Saturdays in the fall.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2005
- Posts
- 74
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've never heard of an insurance company requiring a 1st class medical. Not saying that they couldn't or wouldn't though. You used to need a 1st class medical if you wanted to add any type-ratings to your ATP certificate. That is no longer the case either.landlover said:Insurance aside, why would an ATP be required under part91? Said pilot only rerquired to have a 2nd class medical.
This shouldn't even be a debate. you hand the book of FARs to the "ATP requried" crowd, and ask " where does it say that?"volunteer said:Some say ATP required so 1st class. Others say commercial required so second class. Can anyone put this to bed?
Yes, but it's so much more =fun= to debate from ignorance about what you =think= they say.A Squared said:Why would you argue about the regulations when it's much easier to read then and *know* what the answer is?
A Squared said:This shouldn't even be a debate. you hand the book of FARs to the "ATP requried" crowd, and ask " where does it say that?"
When they are unable to come up with anything supporting thier position (and they won't), you declare the "comm/2nd class" advocates winner of the "debate"
Why would you argue about the regulations when it's much easier to read then and *know* what the answer is?
volunteer said:Maybe you've never encountered them, but there are those that will still debate when you hand them the regs (opened to the page even). The "interpretation" monster comes out then.
A Squared said:I uncderstand that some regulations leave some room to be misunderstood, and that CHief counsel interpretations often add a level of complexity.
THis is not one of those situations.
I'll admit that my curiosity is piqued here. I assume that you are one ofthose who has read the regulations and knows that a commercial certificate and second class medical is all that is needed. Can you explain how exactly the othere's phrase thier argument?
WHen you hand them the book of regulations and say "show me where an ATP is required to pilot a turbine aircraft under part 91"' and they can't do that, what do they then say? how does the "debate" continue from that point?