Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dwhsunday said:Do legacy captians and FO's deny jump seats.
dwhsunday said:Do legacy captians and FO's deny jump seats.
ironspud said:No one gives a crap. Nor should they.
dwhsunday said:Do legacy captians and FO's deny jump seats.
Shrek said:The G0 Jet debacle is being spread by word-of-mouth more and more every day.
Had a United mainline jumpseater the other day and explained what G0 jet was about and he said "oh that Scab outfit? Yeah we know about them and I will make sure I will spread the word to all of my crewmembers......."
It was unsolicited and it made my week........you are being outted - slowly but surely at mainline............
You reap what you sow.
What about all those Avro scabs that were stealing food off of mainline's table?Shrek said:The G0 Jet debacle is being spread by word-of-mouth more and more every day.
Had a United mainline jumpseater the other day and explained what G0 jet was about and he said "oh that Scab outfit? Yeah we know about them and I will make sure I will spread the word to all of my crewmembers......."
It was unsolicited and it made my week........you are being outted - slowly but surely at mainline............
You reap what you sow.
elag777 said:I am amazed that educated people have no idea what a "scab" is... sad
Shrek said:We have heard that one before.........about 15 times now.
Same effect though goofball........
FN FAL said:What about all those Avro scabs that were stealing food off of mainline's table?
Iron Man said:GJ is well endowed with recipprocal agreements: UAL, USAIR, SWA, COMAIR and oh yes TSA. Nothing worse than premeditated lies; oh yes, suicide is worse. I have said it before, TSA has nothing good to say about anyone. If anyone is making a name for themselves it's TSA. I will now standby for your insults, as usual I won't lose any sleep.
ironspud said:No one gives a crap. Nor should they.
redbook said:ALPA President to Trans States Management: We'll Cooperate, but We're Not Backing Down
ST LOUIS, MO - The head of the union that represents pilots at St. Louis-based Trans States Airlines today told pilots at a rally at Lambert Airport that the union is taking a carrot-and-stick approach to resolving labor issues at the airline.
"I have come here today to personally issue a public challenge to your management to alter the course that they have taken in dealing with their pilots," said Capt. Duane Woerth, president of the Air Line Pilots Association, International, in remarks prepared for the rally.
"I have come to challenge them to work cooperatively with our union to help build this airline for the future. And I have come to offer to help promote new business opportunities for this airline and new job opportunities for its ALPA pilots. I am convinced that, together, we can build Trans States into a strong, solid company for decades to come," Woerth said.
"I have also come here to draw public attention to the fact that, sadly, our efforts to discuss the issues before us in cooperation with the company have, to date, met with little to no success. Using only the most tenuous thread of justification, Trans States management has sought to create an alter-ego carrier that they intend to staff with pilots not sheltered by an ALPA-bargained contract," he said.
"In response to this tactic, we have been forced to file a grievance concerning this alter-ego carrier, because management has made it clear that ************************* exists solely to evade ALPA and the TSA-ALPA agreement. The clearest proof? Management's premature and illegal attempt to install a separate union before ************************* employs any pilots or begins operations. While management's public claim that a contractual restriction makes it impossible to extend the ALPA contract to larger jets, I assure you that we can readily overcome this very common obstacle," Woerth said.
"The management at Trans States has concluded that they have some strong opportunities for growth of their company-in new sectors, in new markets, on new routes, and flying for new carriers. I applaud that vision. I salute it. That being said, I insist that the Air Line Pilots Association and the pilots we represent play our legitimate role in tangibly contributing to that growth. There is absolutely no justifiable reason to create an alter-ego carrier or a carrier that is 'walled off' from our pilots, whose sacrifices and hard work have built this company. ************************* may indeed be a viable operation moving forward-but only with our pilots in those cockpits," he said.
"Unfortunately, time is running out, because the management team at TSA has decided to do more than just stop talking to our pilots and their representatives. They have made the unfortunate - and potentially devastating - decision to crack down on our union and our union representatives here in St. Louis and elsewhere," he said.
"Standing right here with me today are two good ALPA representatives-officers who put their necks on the line for their brothers and sisters-who have recently been unjustifiably fired by TSA. The Executive Council of our International union was so outraged by these maneuvers that it recently voted to make these fired pilots financially whole until they are rightfully returned to their cockpits. That's what being union is all about. I will not tolerate attacks on, or interference with, our union representatives-pilots or employees-simply because they are members or staff of this union," Woerth said.
"The climate here at Trans States Airlines does not need to be poisoned. We can start fresh today - if management accepts our offered hand and alters their course of action. If they make that change, we can build a better airline and a better environment for the future," he said.
h25b said:Care to share with us all the date of this ??? It was May 5, 2005.
http://www.alpa.org/DesktopModules/ALPA_Documents/ALPA_DocumentsView.aspx?itemid=1499&ModuleId=506&TabId=93
Over the last 13 months it's been crickets chirping from ALPA National and the NMB Board ruled against ALPA Dec. 21, 2005.
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2006/33n009.pdf
It's over and I believe ALPA has even conceded as such.
redbook said:Ahh, a year ago. So it has expired then?
Pearl Harbor was December 7, 1941. Is there a statute of limitations on that also?
Nothing is over.
h25b said:Yep, it's over...![]()
With millions af Americans driving Japanese cars today and the surrender of Japan aboard the USS Missouri on September 2, 1945, YES, there was a statute of limitations on that as well... :erm:
redbook said:So, the actions on December 7 1941 were a good thing?
No wonder you thing g0jets is a ok.
We are still in the middle of the battle. You are on the losing side.
h25b said:At a quick count 4 family members of mine served in the Pacific theatre in WW2, one KIA... No, it wasn't a good thing. I never said it was.
You made a statement about a statute of limitations and don't insult yourself by trying to make it look like I said something I didn't.
h25b said:The press release was from May 2005 and before the NMB ruled against ALPA in December 2005. That press release consists of nothing more than the bull elephant trumpeting to the herd and rallying the troops towards their eventual failure. You conveniently left out the date when you cut and pasted it from www.alpa.org ...
The timeline is important as you like to try and tell everyone that the battle still rages when it in fact ended with the NMB ruling in December. Furthermore, ALPA National has been silent ever since leaving us all to enjoy the rants and bitche$ of people like yourself who just can't let it go.
You say I am lying and I ask you exactly where I am stating anything other than fact..
redbook said:.....according to the president of 60,000 pilots, to avoid the TSA pilots contract.
redbook said:" There is absolutely no justifiable reason to create an alter-ego carrier or a carrier that is 'walled off' from our pilots, whose sacrifices and hard work have built this company. ************************* may indeed be a viable operation moving forward-but only with our pilots in those cockpits," he said.