With how often this question comes up here, has anyone called the FSDO?
The FSDO has no legal authority to interpret the regulation. Accordingly, the answer you get at the FSDO level has no more authority than that of anyone on this board, at the airport, in the hangar, or on the street. Furthermore, the opinion of an inspector at the FSDO, verbal or in writing, carries no weight in your defense. If you're told or even given a letter that says you can do X, and you do X, and it violates the regulation...then what you've been told and the letter you've received gives you no defense.
Most pilots don't seem to realize this, amazingly enough. Some find out once it's too late.
Avbug, forgive me if I am sounding argumentative as I am really trying to educate myself on this topic, but I am just not seeing the part in the reg where it says I can log PIC while not acting PIC.
14 CFR 61.51(e) speaks to the logging of flight time. Not to acting as pilot in command.
61.51(e) provides five circumstances in which one can log PIC:
Sole manipulator of the controls (if rated: category and class).
Sole occupant.
Acting as PIC of an aircraft for which more than one pilot is required.
An authorized instructor, when acting as an authorized instructor.
A student pilot when solo, undergoing instruction, and properly endorsed.
That's it.
A very common example which is frequently brought up is a non-instrument-rated pilot logging PIC in instrument conditions, or logging PIC while on an instrument flight plan. Perfectly legal.
Two pilots fly a Cessna 172 from A to B. It requires only one pilot. The flight is conducted under IFR. Pilot A is the acting PIC, but doesn't touch the controls. Pilot B is not instrument rated, but is sole manipulator. Pilot B can log the time as PIC, but pilot A cannot log the time at all...he's PIC of an aircraft requiring only one pilot, and doesn't fulfill any of the requirements to log the time. Pilot B does.
Two pilots fly a Cessna 172 from A to B. It requires only one pilot. The flight is conducted under VFR. Pilot A is the acting PIC, but doesn't touch the controls. Pilot B is not instrument rated, but is sole manipulator, and wears a view limiting device. Pilot B can lot the time as PIC, but Pilot A can also log the time as PIC; he's a safety pilot and required by 14 CFR 91.109(b). Both may log PIC.
Two pilots fly a Cessna 172 from A to B. It requires only one pilot. The flight is conducted under VFR or IFR. Pilot A is the acting PIC, but doesn't touch the controls. Pilot B is a student pilot, but is sole manipulator. Pilot B cannot log the time as PIC or SIC, as he doesn't meet the requirements to log the time. Pilot A cannot log the time as he doesn't meet the requirements either. In this case, neither may log flight time.
Acting as PIC is not the same as logging PIC, and shouldn't be confused.
Tom Morris
469 Riverside Drive
Ormond Beach, Florida 32176
Dear Mr. Morris:
In a letter dated March 9, 2006, you inquired whether you could record as pilot-in-command (PIC) time, the periods during which you were the ‘sole manipulator of the controls’ of a United States Air Force (USAF) KC-135 pursuant to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. (14 CFR) section 61.51(e)(1)(i). The pertinent facts you provided are that you are a rated military pilot that serves as a co-pilot and that you have completed pilot proficiency checks in the KC-135. 14 CFR § 61.51(e)(1)(i) states in relevant part:
A sport, recreational, private, or commercial pilot may log pilot-in-command time only for that flight time during which that person—is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated or has privileges;
We would consider you rated in the aircraft, which in the civilian version (Boeing 707) requires a type rating, by virtue of having completed the pilot proficiency check. Thus, in evaluating your military flight time, we would treat the time as PIC time under section 61.51(e)(1)(i).
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Naveen Rao of my staff at (202) 267-3073.
Sincerely,
Rebecca MacPherson
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations