Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Leaving Delta for Corporate

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
semperfido said:
complete BS...get real...rose colored glasses...its no diff now than it was back whenever....dog eat dog....can't wait til you get to the other side of 50.

... a jerk is still a jerk .... The the beauty of being a Chief Pilot is, I d o no have to waer rose colored glasses. I can tell these guys to go home and enjoy there retirement and remind them that they have no class. When the 1000's of qualified furloughed guys are back at work then I will gladly look at retiree's. It has nothing to do with age, sir.
 
Catyaak,

I respect your views, I'm not saying that I completely disagree with everything you're saying. But, I will take a wild guess that you're not happy with the way your flying career has gone, for you to be so pissed off about something like a 60 year old retiree wanting to continue to fly airplanes is amazing. Don't forget that there are many 60 year olds out there that were Captains making 180K/yr, then to be bumped back to F/O, then to take a 35% paycut in THAT seat, then to lose their pension, then to be stuck for 2 years without any social security, still paying alamony payments.........Alot of guys out there need jobs to live, even if they are older. Many people feel that flying is the only thing they are good at. You seem to take this stand that if anyone comes looking for a job and they are a retired airline guy, he's a "scab" or as you like to say "whore". You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but you are a little out of bounds here.

And, by your theory, in his eyes....every single RJ pilot out their must be a "scab whore" as well. Lets say he's sitting in the left seat of his 737 and his F/O is on his last flight due to an upcoming furlough. Why? Because the RJ guys taxing out in front of them are now flying their routes for less than half of what they are flying it for. Dare you put all the RJ pilots out there in your same little category?? You most likely will. Hell, you might as well through the guys at Frontier, Spirit, JetBlue, Indy Air, into the same category. They are flying Airbuses for alot less than the guys at NWA, UAL, and USAirways are/were.

I'll venture a guess that you aren't much fun to fly with. You seem awfully uptight and of the opinion that if some pilot didn't take the same route as you did, they suck and you will have a word to label them with.

Lighten up Francis. Find a job environment that you enjoy, and go do it. Start by giving people the benefit of the doubt. I hope that you let out your steam on this web board and not at work, I can guarantee you that people at work don't want to hear someone complaining all day long about "how it should be according to me."
 
Wow! G100driver sounds pretty upset over this issue. I guess 4500 hours and a CP title makes him an expert on right to work issues and age 60 politics that defy common sense in most cases. I wonder if his company has an HR department and subscribes to his age based approach to hiring the most qualified pilot. I am not suggesting that every retired airline pilots is worthy of being hired and if the job description includes experience in the corporate world, and especially if there is a specific aircraft experience requirement then yes that is the type of person that should be hired first.

However to suggest that a retired pilot has no right to seek employment and would be better off renting an airplane for his enjoyment or pleasure is so short sighted and stupid that one has to wonder where G100driver will be in a few years with that type of attitude? BTW what is a G100 anyway? Also, with only 4500 hours its not likely that G100driver was even around for the UAL and EAL debacles and if you don't know what your talking about, please don't bring it up in the first place. Maybe your father was there, but certainly not you.

In case G100driver has not noticed many of the current crop of airline pilots will not have any significant retirement income in the future. Since SS will not be available until they reach age 66 or 67, I see nothing wrong with seeking employment in a field where they might be best qualified. I do not subscibe to the "I can do it for less money" concept that has been discussed and although I have heard of this activity, I think it could be discouraged with just a little word to the wise if you get my drift.
 
DBCOOPER said:
Catyaak,

I respect your views, I'm not saying that I completely disagree with everything you're saying. But, I will take a wild guess that you're not happy with the way your flying career has gone, for you to be so pissed off about something like a 60 year old retiree wanting to continue to fly airplanes is amazing. Don't forget that there are many 60 year olds out there that were Captains making 180K/yr, then to be bumped back to F/O, then to take a 35% paycut in THAT seat, then to lose their pension, then to be stuck for 2 years without any social security, still paying alamony payments.........Alot of guys out there need jobs to live, even if they are older. Many people feel that flying is the only thing they are good at. You seem to take this stand that if anyone comes looking for a job and they are a retired airline guy, he's a "scab" or as you like to say "whore". You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but you are a little out of bounds here.

And, by your theory, in his eyes....every single RJ pilot out their must be a "scab whore" as well. Lets say he's sitting in the left seat of his 737 and his F/O is on his last flight due to an upcoming furlough. Why? Because the RJ guys taxing out in front of them are now flying their routes for less than half of what they are flying it for. Dare you put all the RJ pilots out there in your same little category?? You most likely will. Hell, you might as well through the guys at Frontier, Spirit, JetBlue, Indy Air, into the same category. They are flying Airbuses for alot less than the guys at NWA, UAL, and USAirways are/were.

I'll venture a guess that you aren't much fun to fly with. You seem awfully uptight and of the opinion that if some pilot didn't take the same route as you did, they suck and you will have a word to label them with.

Lighten up Francis. Find a job environment that you enjoy, and go do it. Start by giving people the benefit of the doubt. I hope that you let out your steam on this web board and not at work, I can guarantee you that people at work don't want to hear someone complaining all day long about "how it should be according to me."


good post
 
Spooky 1 said:
Wow! G100driver sounds pretty upset over this issue. I guess 4500 hours and a CP title makes him an expert on right to work issues and age 60 politics that defy common sense in most cases. I wonder if his company has an HR department and subscribes to his age based approach to hiring the most qualified pilot. I am not suggesting that every retired airline pilots is worthy of being hired and if the job description includes experience in the corporate world, and especially if there is a specific aircraft experience requirement then yes that is the type of person that should be hired first.

However to suggest that a retired pilot has no right to seek employment and would be better off renting an airplane for his enjoyment or pleasure is so short sighted and stupid that one has to wonder where G100driver will be in a few years with that type of attitude? BTW what is a G100 anyway? Also, with only 4500 hours its not likely that G100driver was even around for the UAL and EAL debacles and if you don't know what your talking about, please don't bring it up in the first place. Maybe your father was there, but certainly not you.

In case G100driver has not noticed many of the current crop of airline pilots will not have any significant retirement income in the future. Since SS will not be available until they reach age 66 or 67, I see nothing wrong with seeking employment in a field where they might be best qualified. I do not subscibe to the "I can do it for less money" concept that has been discussed and although I have heard of this activity, I think it could be discouraged with just a little word to the wise if you get my drift.

exactly and if i had an opening and the right guy walked through the door at the right time....he's In..no matter where he came from.
 
Spooky 1 said:
Wow! In case G100driver has not noticed many of the current crop of airline pilots will not have any significant retirement income in the future. Since SS will not be available until they reach age 66 or 67, I see nothing wrong with seeking employment in a field where they might be best qualified. I do not subscibe to the "I can do it for less money" concept that has been discussed and although I have heard of this activity, I think it could be discouraged with just a little word to the wise if you get my drift.

Actually, I have noticed. I am not referring to the guys that are coming out of USAir or some situation like that. I empathize with the individual who lost his retirement through no means of his own. Would I look at that guy, you bet.

When I see a person, who collected his annuity and is still receiving the full benefit of his defined pension program, ie UAL/Delta retiree's, I am not really interested in him. As far as the money aspect of your arguement goes, you would think so, but it does not work. The Delta guy I was referring to in my previous post is completly clueless.

There are a lot of very qualifed guys out there who NEED work. Retiree's who collected their annuities and are receiving full pensions are NOT them. I know everbodies situation is different, but if you retired from the Big 4 with a 25+ year career you are not one of them as far as I am concerned. If you want to work, teach. Pass on you knowledge. I have taken classes from several former airline guys and nothing but respect with their ability and knowledge.

Spooky 1 said:
BTW what is a G100 anyway?
It is an Astra. When I signed up 3 or 4 years ago all the Astra names were taken. We have since upgraded our flight department.

Spooky 1 said:
Also, with only 4500 hours its not likely that G100driver was even around for the UAL and EAL debacles and if you don't know what your talking about

Funny you should say that. When I was a kid my next door neighbor used to work for the pre-Lorenzo Contiental. It is pretty sad when you see a guy you have known for your entire life have to sell their house and start over. So I can empathize with the dude who lost his retirement.

While I was not a part of it, I still can see the effects of such events and still meet people who were effected by these events.

As for the flight time, I will guess I should update.

BTW, I also hired a furloughee to fly with me when I 1st got hired to run my flight department. He was an old friend, he needed a job, and I knew that he would be a loyal employee who could handle not being in charge (except when it is his leg).

Finally, I am not upset. I know that I cannot change the world. There will still be self centered jerks out there. There will always be the 10%ers who make the professionals look bad. I am just here to point it out and hope that others who are in a position to hire and fire out here in corporate world will look long and hard at the people and their situations before you give someone an opprotunity.

I would be curious to hear what a current furloughee's at one of the Big 4 would have to say about a recent retiree taking flying jobs while they are still pounding the streets.
 
Last edited:
DBCOOPER said:
Catyaak,

I respect your views, I'm not saying that I completely disagree with everything you're saying. But, I will take a wild guess that you're not happy with the way your flying career has gone, for you to be so pissed off about something like a 60 year old retiree wanting to continue to fly airplanes is amazing. Don't forget that there are many 60 year olds out there that were Captains making 180K/yr, then to be bumped back to F/O, then to take a 35% paycut in THAT seat, then to lose their pension, then to be stuck for 2 years without any social security, still paying alamony payments.........Alot of guys out there need jobs to live, even if they are older. Many people feel that flying is the only thing they are good at. You seem to take this stand that if anyone comes looking for a job and they are a retired airline guy, he's a "scab" or as you like to say "whore". You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but you are a little out of bounds here.

And, by your theory, in his eyes....every single RJ pilot out their must be a "scab whore" as well. Lets say he's sitting in the left seat of his 737 and his F/O is on his last flight due to an upcoming furlough. Why? Because the RJ guys taxing out in front of them are now flying their routes for less than half of what they are flying it for. Dare you put all the RJ pilots out there in your same little category?? You most likely will. Hell, you might as well through the guys at Frontier, Spirit, JetBlue, Indy Air, into the same category. They are flying Airbuses for alot less than the guys at NWA, UAL, and USAirways are/were.

I'll venture a guess that you aren't much fun to fly with. You seem awfully uptight and of the opinion that if some pilot didn't take the same route as you did, they suck and you will have a word to label them with.

Lighten up Francis. Find a job environment that you enjoy, and go do it. Start by giving people the benefit of the doubt. I hope that you let out your steam on this web board and not at work, I can guarantee you that people at work don't want to hear someone complaining all day long about "how it should be according to me."

Having a hard time with comprehension DB, or what?. Where did you get this fantasy that I'm pissed off at 60 year old retired guys who want to keep flying...more power to him. He/she ALWAYS has the benefit of the doubt with me. Please show me where I wrote that I was prejudiced against them and back up your allegation of me "seeming" that way. I specifically qualified the airline pilots I wrote about by saying they were "lowballing" ones..that's the subject at hand..pay...what they, or anyone, will work for vs. what's considered industry standard. Perhaps you're so hyper-sensitized and defensive about airline pilots that my repeated use of this clear and unmistakable adjective didn't register through your emotional response.

You write that "I seem to take this stand that if anyone comes looking for a job and he's a retired airline guy, he's a scab, or as you like to put it, a whore". Did it "seem" that way to you?....if it did, you need remedial reading classes, my friend, and I'm saying that because I'll consider your attempt to assign me this prejudicial age-and-background bias against a prospective pilot I may hire to your own lack of comprehension skills, rather than a purposeful attempt to drape me with a mantle of Royal Assholery. The fact is DB, I wrote nothing that even comes close to what you are accusing me of here.

But it's clear why you do put words in my mouth...(beginning with lame-o lead-in "it seems"..continuing to "I'd venture"...etc..) so you can extrapolate some fantasy of your own making regarding a set of personality traits you accuse me of possessing in order to enter a straw-man debate with yourself on things like "people have to work after 60". This is a sign of arrested emotional developement I'm sorry to say. Judging isn't the same as pre-judging DB. If a lowballing corporate puke tried for job versus a retired airline guy asking industry standard my hiring decision judgement would not change, I'd hire the airline guy. In my experience however, that scenario never happened, although the reverse did. This is not to say I never hired retired or between-job airline guys WHO WERE ASKING WHAT THEY WERE WORTH (perhaps if I spell it out bigger and plainly, you'll get it) because I did, and flew with some good ones.

And much as you'd obviously like to think I do in your little fantasy exercise of assigning me negative traits, I don't have a vague, nebulous theory that every RJ pilot is a "scab whore". Just what is a "scab whore" anyway? I know what a "scab" is, which presumes a union shop company and workers crossing a striking membership's picket line, and that's the only definition that I know of. At least when I was a dues-paying ALPA member it was....has that changed or something? This examples you list regarding this "theory" you say I must have (once again for the purposes of debating yourself) ...is nothing more than the mish-mash of competitive pricing, downsizing, or farming out routes that's part of the landscape of revenue-flying in a deregulated industry.

Your wild guess as to "how I am" (bitter, or something) is so off the mark it's pretty funny. But since you made this accusation I'll say that I love my career path, love where I'm at now, where I've been, who I've flown with, and even get paid a lot for doing it. Certainly, I don't judge someone about the route they've taken, if I did I'd have to get rid of most of my old college and high school flying buddies I've had for well over 20 years now that are mostly at the majors. To each his own, everyone has a different idea of what makes them happy. Flying for the airlines gave me a great set of experiences to draw upon and good friends, just like all the years of corporate flying have done. Airline flying has its good and bad points, just like corporate flying...it's not a competition. You should learn this.

And believe me, the last thing anyone would ever tell you about me in the cockpit or on the ground is that I'm "uptight". If anything they nudge me to see if I'm awake. I'm into comfort, and that includes being paid enough to be comfortable, and having a comfortable atmosphere amongst the crew. And since you mentioned complaining at work, that was the biggest reason I left the airlines.....nothing in my years flying corporate will ever equal the amount of complaining, bellyaching, and whining as I heard in airline cockpits. with so many self-appointed experts opining how the company or unions should be run, endlessly preaching "how it should be". That you would use my views on the single issue of undercutting industry standard wages into being an overbearing a$$hole in a mere 4 paragraphs is quite a feat in misrepresenting pretty much everything I wrote. Congrats.

The irony here, of course, is that here you are, no doubt an airline or former airline guy, bi1ching in your fantasy diatribe about me, who's only point is, and has ALWAYS been, that when I'm in the position of hiring corporate pilots, I'd rather pay them industry standard or MORE, and if they aren't asking it by a longshot and blatantly lowballing, then I don't want them wherever they are from. I'm not alone in this view in the corporate world, and you gnashing your teeth over it and deliberatly misrepresenting what I've written tells me that you're either very young or pretty green when it comes to this segment of aviation where you act as your own one-man union. Who are you to tell me I must hire the cheapest labor, when even my boss makes it clear he doesn't want that used as a criteria?
 
"Royal Assholery"


ROFL That is a good one...I am going to co-opt that one...it is just too good to pass up.​
 
Hmmm. Quite a debate. Looks like I've got my work cut out for me.

Just a note...I'm not retired, not even close. I've got 23 years until 60 and currently, my projected seniority at retirement is in the 10-15 range. Any job I may be offered will be given great consideration. When/if someone is interviewing me, I will also be interviewing them and the company. I have a feeling any negative "airline pilot" bias will be readily apparent. If someone labels me as an arrogant airline pilot or any other stereotype, I have no desire to work for that operation anyway.

Thanks for all who offer useful, logical advice.

T
 
snow-back said:
Hmmm. Quite a debate. Looks like I've got my work cut out for me.

Just a note...I'm not retired, not even close. I've got 23 years until 60 and currently, my projected seniority at retirement is in the 10-15 range. Any job I may be offered will be given great consideration. When/if someone is interviewing me, I will also be interviewing them and the company. I have a feeling any negative "airline pilot" bias will be readily apparent. If someone labels me as an arrogant airline pilot or any other stereotype, I have no desire to work for that operation anyway.

Thanks for all who offer useful, logical advice.

T

good post. hang in there at dal. it's always greener.
 
snow-back said:
Hmmm. Quite a debate. Looks like I've got my work cut out for me.

Just a note...I'm not retired, not even close. I've got 23 years until 60 and currently, my projected seniority at retirement is in the 10-15 range. Any job I may be offered will be given great consideration. When/if someone is interviewing me, I will also be interviewing them and the company. I have a feeling any negative "airline pilot" bias will be readily apparent. If someone labels me as an arrogant airline pilot or any other stereotype, I have no desire to work for that operation anyway.

Thanks for all who offer useful, logical advice.

T

Any flight department with maturity will be happy to have you and your expirence. Really, the only guys that have rallied against airline guys in need of employment have napolean <sp> complex.

Just be honest and any flight department with class will give you a shot. The ones that will not probably are not worth working for. They are typically low paying and run by a dictator who has never had much sucess.

Be careful what you leave behind. Corporate does not have many of the benfits that you have gotten used to. Good luck.
 
snow-back said:
When/if someone is interviewing me, I will also be interviewing them and the company. I have a feeling any negative "airline pilot" bias will be readily apparent. If someone labels me as an arrogant airline pilot or any other stereotype, I have no desire to work for that operation anyway.

Right on. Likewise, you wouldn't want to work for an operation that bases it's hiring decision on finding the cheapest pilot around, whether it be a salaried postion or temp part-time contract work. Resist any temptation to be that in order to get the job..it only encourages them, and the bad pay is ususally just the tip of the iceburg of a poorly-run operation.
 
well...my .02...like anyone cares..

The stories of Airline, scab list carrying "Union Brothers" coming out to whore themselves in the corp arena are very true...I have seen it. Just dont even go there...all you will come across is a $hit job that pays low....but it doesen't sound like thats where you're coming from anyhow..

But, I gotta say, if you are somewhat secure at DAL and will finish in the top 20 you are certifiably insane for thinking about jumping for corporate now. You have already paid your dues, why start all over?

Not that the airlines are better than corp IMHO, the same would hold true for an established corp guy - he would be crazy to drop a top job and head to the airlines now..

I like my corp job very much, I work less than ANY of my buds at DAL, and my job a lot more exciting. I enjoy the world travel, the decent treatment, and the time I have at home. Its a Fortune 10+ job with some stablilty (easy with the "S" word..) and Im not leaving...but...in the financial long run I still think I would be better off retiring at DAL after 30 years than after 30 years at a decent corp gig.

Im sure there are other factors involved, bit I would stay put.

Just an opinion..

GOOD LUCK!
 
After looking at the recent posted major airline pay scales I make more as a G550 Captain than a Major airline B777 Captain makes.

Plus, when we fly to places we stay a few days and have fun. I was in Buenos Aires this week on a 5 day trip. Flew down on Monday and flew back on Friday. Got to do some good shopping on Florida street.
 
DAL 777 capts are still making 250ish??

If you are making that flying a GV you have it made! - hope it never goes away because you will have a very hard time replacing that income...a few posts up has Netjets morons making 56K flying a G5...how about that?? -- absurd huh?

PS - You Hiring???

:D ...
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom