Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

LCC/AMR Merger offer

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
[FONT=&quot] i don't think CLT is going anywhere cepting to get bigger.....[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Airport bets a billion on future amid USAir concerns[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Expansion plans, however, fuel questions surrounding US Airways[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]By Ely Portillo
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Charlotte/Douglas International is in the midst of another round of construction, with a terminal expansion, top, a huge new hourly parking lot, below. Todd Sumlin - [email protected] [/FONT]


  • [FONT=&quot]Airport projects under way or on the drawing board [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Adding 56,000 square feet to terminal, fifth security checkpoint, larger international arrivals area. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Completion date: July. [/FONT]


[FONT=&quot]Adding 12 gates to the US Airways Express E Concourse, which currently has 36 gates. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dates: Expected to start later this year. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Funding: $18.5 million in airport bonds. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]West terminal expansion [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]New international terminal [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A proposed separate, 25-gate international terminal with more capacity could be built where the rental car facility currently sits. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dates: Construction could begin in spring 2015, completed in two years. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Funding: $175 million in airport bonds. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Fifth runway[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A new runway could be built in between existing runways to increase the airport’s capacity. It would be the airport’s fourth parallel runway, bringing the total to five. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dates: Not set. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Funding: $120 million in airport bonds.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]New control tower [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A control tower to replace the airport’s current tower next to the daily parking deck. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dates: Under study, could be completed by 2019. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Funding: $60 million, paid for by the Federal Aviation Administration. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot] Will it merge with bankrupt American Airlines? And if it does, will Charlotte Douglas remain a major hub?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]US Airways is studying a merger with American, while Delta Air Lines also has been reportedly studying a merger with US Airways. Aviation analyst Henry Harteveldt of Cambridge, Mass.-based Atmosphere Research Group, said it’s risky to invest in more capacity with the future of the airport’s No. 1 carrier up in the air.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Charlotte’s future is so heavily tied to US Airways’ status as an independent airline, and right now there is a lot of uncertainty,” he said. “There really is a risk.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Orr says he’s not concerned about the possibility of a US Airways merger. He said there always will be room in the Southeast for a hub besides Atlanta, and Charlotte Douglas can be that hub as long as it is well-run and stays low-cost for airlines. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]US Airways CEO Doug Parker says the airline remains [/FONT][FONT=&quot]committed to a Charlotte hub[/FONT][FONT=&quot], *** even in the event of a merger. “I suspect in any sort of individual scenario that involves US Airways or any other airline in the future, that Charlotte will be a hub airport,” he told the Observer last month.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]***See attached article[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Upcoming projects will be paid for by airport revenue bonds, the federal government or private funds. Airport bonds are issued against the airport’s credit rating, and repaid with fees the airlines pay to use the airport. Although the airport is owned by the city of Charlotte, it does not receive city tax dollars.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Late last year, Moody’s Investor Service raised the airport’s bond rating to Aa3, one of the highest available. Orr said that will allow Charlotte Douglas to borrow money cheaply to fund the upcoming projects[/FONT][FONT=&quot].[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]But even as it raised the bond rating, Moody’s noted the airport’s primary risk is “reductions to US Airways connecting operations.” US Airways operates almost 600 of the airport’s 670 daily flights.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The airport’s growth has coincided with Charlotte’s. City officials and business leaders often praise Charlotte Douglas, which offers more than 130 direct destinations, a large number for a city of Charlotte’s size.[/FONT]


[FONT=&quot]Moving the chess pieces[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]“So after we build this (fourth parallel) runway, we’d close this one,” he says, pointing to the diagonal runway, “and build another one over here. Then we’d have a footprint exactly like Atlanta, same size, same footprint.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Once you close that, you can extend that concourse all the way across there and have 50 gates on one concourse, take these two concourses out, put a people mover in between,” he says, showing how he would demolish parts of existing concourses and build two concourses parallel to the terminal. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Then there’s room in here to build another one of those, and another one,” he said, making four parallel concourses connected by a tram.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A record 39 million passengers flew through Charlotte Douglas last year, up about 2 percent from 2010[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. The FAA forecasts total operations at the airport will continue to grow at an annual rate of just under 2 percent.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Charlotte Douglas is one of the most concentrated hub airports in the country, with US Airways and US Airways Express operating almost 90 percent of the airport’s daily flights. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Other airports with expansion plans have met resistance from the airlines, who end up bearing much of the cost. A proposed runway and terminal expansion project at Philadelphia International Airport carries a reported price tag estimated between $6.4 billion and $10.5 billion.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]US Airways has said it might reduce its operations in Philadelphia, its second-busiest hub, due to the cost. Airlines ultimately bear much of that cost through the fees they pay to use airports.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]By contrast, US Airways executives praise Charlotte Douglas freely, in part because Charlotte’s expansion plans are cheap compared with other airports’. For example, Orr’s proposal for a fourth parallel runway carries an estimated price tag of about $120 million, compared with somewhere between $1.8 billion and $3 billion for a new runway at Philadelphia.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]When asked if US Airways and Charlotte would clash over the cost of Orr’s proposed expansions, Parker said no. “We’ve never had an issue with Charlotte,” [/FONT][FONT=&quot]the US Airways CEO told the Observer. “The airport is very efficient. It doesn’t spend money it doesn’t need to spend.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Expanding the airport can benefit consumers by offering more choices and potentially more competition from other carriers, said Rick Seaney, CEO of airfare tracking website [/FONT][FONT=&quot]FareCompare.com[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. But he warned that consumers will ultimately pay the tab for any expansion.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Airlines operate on thin profit margins, so when airports pass along costs to airlines, airlines turn around and pass those costs on to passengers” in the form of higher airfare or increased fees, Seaney said.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]When airports lose hubs[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]What if a merger changes Charlotte’s status as a hub? Other hub airports have suffered as their main carriers slashed flights:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]• Pittsburgh International Airport, a former US Airways hub, was stuck with a new, $1 billion terminal after US Airways cut hundreds of flights there. Airport officials have said they expect to be paying back debt for the expansion until 2018. That, in turn, has kept its operating costs high.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Harteveldt sees such stories as cautionary tales for Charlotte Douglas. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“If I were the airport, I’d want to have a lot more confidence into what US Airways’ future is before I start building more terminal capacity,” he said.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Parker, the US Airways CEO, said he expects growth at Charlotte Douglas to outpace the national average in coming years.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Orr brushes aside any suggestion that a US Airways merger could jeopardize airport expansion plans or Charlotte’s air service. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Analysts have said a combined US Airways-American could use Charlotte as a hub. American lacks a strong hub on the East Coast.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“I think that there will always be two hubs in the Southeast and I think it’s Charlotte’s destiny to be one of those two hubs,” Orr said. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Portillo: 704-358-5041On Twitter @ESPortillo[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/20...t-bets-a-billion-on-future.html#storylink=cpy[/FONT]
 
I don think so. Them Fitch guys what rates airports and such sez that Charlotte is OK. Then there is the fact that CLT is cheap to run...

Fitch affirms A+ rating on Charlotte Douglas International Airport bonds

Charlotte Business Journal

Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 10:03am EDT




Sponsored Links

Growth Stock Pick (CTLE)The Nano-tech Juggernaut; An Awakening $2.6 Trillion Giant...www.theamericansignal.com

Accelerate Your Cloud Journey With EMCInteractive Whitepaper from CIO Magazine & EMC On IT's Next Transformation.www.emc.com
Get Listed Here

Fitch Ratings has affirmed its A+ rating on $586 million in revenue bonds from Charlotte Douglas International Airport. The outlook is stable.
The airport’s financial strength is reflected in its continued high levels of debt-service coverage ratios and liquidity, the agency says.
In addition, Fitch salutes a prudently managed capital program.
Passenger traffic growth at the airport has been strong in recent years and continues to outperform forecasts. Boardings grew an average 7.7 percent annually from 2006 through 2010, while seating capacity offered grew an average of 2.1 percent, indicating healthy load factors on flights served at the airport, Fitch says.
Connecting passengers increased 17 percent during the first half of fiscal 2011. However, significant single-carrier concentration, with US Airways Group Inc. (NYSE:LCC) accounting for 89 percent of enplanements, exposes the airport to the carrier’s scheduling decisions and the overall aviation environment, Fitch says.
Industries:

Travel
 
Are we rich, beeotches?

I, for one, welcome my new opportunity to "be patriotic." (pay moar taxes in Joe Bite Me-speak)
 
CLT is a hub because by the mid 90's usair had eliminated every other vestige of the PSA and Piedmont route-structures that they acquired in the late 80's and ditching the CLT hub too would have essentially meant throwing in the towel on the whole airline. CLT is cost-effective and offers a reasonably good-weather and low-ATC-delay buffer to the congested northeast. That said, it is a holdover from the 80's market-share driven small-town hub craze. The trend now is clearly fewer hubs in much larger markets. CLT offers tiny O & D which goes against airline 101 hub strategy. Those 39 million passengers are just changing planes and could as easily be doing so in RDU or BNA. Who knows what will happen post-merger but I suspect AA will evaluate MIA against CLT and one of them will go away.

Ignore anything that airline officials say in the next couple years regarding hubs, maintenance bases, domiciles, layoffs, etc... They're paid hucksters at this point, doing and saying anything to get the deal through.
 
All true, Reep, but as someone said earlier, ain't nobody gonna connect via a hub in MIA from one SE destination to another.

CLT originating traffic is poor, but only in comparison to most other hubs. It isn't insignificant. Barring a change to point to point a cheap truckstop-like switching yard (which CLT is) is a decent alternative. Also, the CLT economy has and will continue to grow relative to most places, especially liberal bastions like ORD, NYC, LAX and the entire east coast.
 
This just in...there is NO MOU agreed upon! Lol...wut?


Ya. That don't make us look desperate.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top