PHXFLYR
USAir by default
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2003
- Posts
- 2,177
I still am confused why binding arbitration is not binding. You guys will be arguing about this until you or the airline go into the grave.
Oh, it's binding all right. As a matter of fact USAPA recently lost a DFR lawsuit and is currently operating under a federal injunction requiring them to negotiate in good faith a new working agreement for all pilots using the NIC list . Not bad for an alleged "union" that's been around for just over 2 years , eh ? Of course in all their infinite wisdom the brain trust at "goon central " have appealed the lower court ruling ,which I guess you can say is their right ,and right now we are currently awaiting the out come. But one thing you can count on. When it's all said and done, the list will be the list for the combined airline going forward. Count on it.
The ironic thing in all this? It was the easties that first requested binding arbitration back in 2006 when we we trying to craft a new seniority list together on our own. Of course our side, not wanting to give up control of the process to a third party tried to talk them out of it,to no avail. And here we are; 4 years later, with the easties complaining to any and all about the outcome to a process that they requested in the first place.
.....un-frickin' believable,eh?
PHXFLYR
Last edited: